Hudratronium commented on pull request #197:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/197#issuecomment-797760472
Hi @PaulAngus
red your mail at the mailing-list. This really is a bummer. Especially as
the feature is even now availeable for users with the new
>From a technical viewpoint and low level operations in hypervisor, does it
need something more than detaching disk from source VM and attaching it to
destination VM that has already been implemented in CloudStack? Also these
features can be available for CSI because CloudStack support it:
Raw
Hi Wei,
>>CloudStack kubernetes clusters should use other storage (for example
NFS or
ceph) for persistent volumes.
if i not wrong CSI and CNI is already integrated in kubernetes.
To make it configurable about CS would be great idea.
Cheers,
On Friday, 03/12/2021 at 21:17 Wei ZHOU
I was wondering if it is feasible, as CloudStack does not provide storage
solutions like EBS, Azure disk, openstack cinder.
CloudStack kubernetes clusters should use other storage (for example NFS or
ceph) for persistent volumes.
Correct me if I am wrong.
-Wei
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 20:56,
Hi
I think writing a Container Storage Interface (CSI) for Kubernetes could be
a good idea.
Regards
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 1:00 PM Giles Sirett
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> It would be great if the CloudStack project were able to get a few Google
> Summer of Code [1] students this year to work on
rhtyd commented on issue #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-797440578
Ping @onitake cc @davidjumani @gsirett
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
DaanHoogland commented on pull request #78:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/78#issuecomment-797369191
Just checked, this PR is very stale, closing
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
DaanHoogland closed pull request #78:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/78
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
DaanHoogland commented on a change in pull request #78:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/78#discussion_r593030912
##
File path: data/cloudstack.yml
##
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
versions:
- main: 4.14.0.0
+ main: 4.15.0.0
main_islts: yes
- main_docs_url:
rhtyd commented on a change in pull request #78:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/78#discussion_r593026584
##
File path: data/cloudstack.yml
##
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
versions:
- main: 4.14.0.0
+ main: 4.15.0.0
main_islts: yes
- main_docs_url:
PaulAngus commented on pull request #197:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/197#issuecomment-797350868
The premise that 'advanced networking with security groups' with only one
network is equivalent to basic networking is completely wrong.
please see my
Hi all,
I was doing some testing recently and found that the premise used to depreciate
'basic networking' is completely wrong.
Guest networks in basic networking, have ONE SUBNET PER POD, and a gateway per
pod for inter-pod guest traffic. Advanced networks with security groups'
guest
DaanHoogland merged pull request #79:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/79
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
13 matches
Mail list logo
