Re: [PR] Documentation for checkVolume API [cloudstack-documentation]

2024-02-19 Thread via GitHub
blueorangutan commented on PR #380: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/380#issuecomment-1953619383 QA-Doc build preview: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/builds/docs-build/pr/380. (QA-JID 214) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond

Re: [PR] Documentation for checkVolume API [cloudstack-documentation]

2024-02-19 Thread via GitHub
blueorangutan commented on PR #380: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/380#issuecomment-1953618382 @harikrishna-patnala a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. -- This is an automated message from the Apache

Re: [PR] Documentation for checkVolume API [cloudstack-documentation]

2024-02-19 Thread via GitHub
harikrishna-patnala commented on PR #380: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/380#issuecomment-1953617425 @blueorangutan docbuild -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

Re: [PR] Documentation for checkVolume API [cloudstack-documentation]

2024-02-19 Thread via GitHub
harikrishna-patnala commented on PR #380: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/380#issuecomment-1953617289 Addressed them @sureshanaparti, please review -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub

Re: [PR] Documentation for checkVolume API [cloudstack-documentation]

2024-02-19 Thread via GitHub
sureshanaparti commented on code in PR #380: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/380#discussion_r1495339756 ## source/adminguide/storage.rst: ## @@ -962,6 +962,54 @@ Bytes read/write, as well as the total IO/s, are exposed via UI, as shown in the

Re: [PR] Documentation for checkVolume API [cloudstack-documentation]

2024-02-19 Thread via GitHub
sureshanaparti commented on code in PR #380: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/380#discussion_r1495338830 ## source/adminguide/storage.rst: ## @@ -962,6 +962,54 @@ Bytes read/write, as well as the total IO/s, are exposed via UI, as shown in the

Re: [PR] Documentation for checkVolume API [cloudstack-documentation]

2024-02-19 Thread via GitHub
sureshanaparti commented on code in PR #380: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/380#discussion_r1495338395 ## source/adminguide/storage.rst: ## @@ -962,6 +962,54 @@ Bytes read/write, as well as the total IO/s, are exposed via UI, as shown in the

Re: [PR] Documentation for checkVolume API [cloudstack-documentation]

2024-02-19 Thread via GitHub
sureshanaparti commented on code in PR #380: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/380#discussion_r1495337661 ## source/adminguide/storage.rst: ## @@ -962,6 +962,54 @@ Bytes read/write, as well as the total IO/s, are exposed via UI, as shown in the

Re: [PR] Documentation for checkVolume API [cloudstack-documentation]

2024-02-19 Thread via GitHub
harikrishna-patnala commented on PR #380: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/380#issuecomment-1953606780 > @harikrishna-patnala > > Could you please mention the check volume api will work only if disk formats is in qcow2. > > It doesn't work with Raw

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

2024-02-19 Thread Nux
+1 On 2024-02-19 15:09, Andrija Panic wrote: +1 On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 13:50, Daan Hoogland wrote: LS, This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be counted please reply to dev@. As discussed in [1] we are deciding to drop the 4 from our versioning scheme. The

Re: [PR] Update SDKs [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

2024-02-19 Thread via GitHub
rohityadavcloud commented on PR #71: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/71#issuecomment-1953109896 Rekicking build check -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

Re: [PR] Update SDKs [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

2024-02-19 Thread via GitHub
rohityadavcloud closed pull request #71: Update SDKs URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/71 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

Re: [PR] Adding attach volume resource [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

2024-02-19 Thread via GitHub
rohityadavcloud merged PR #76: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/76 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [I] Using display_text as a filter in template data-source causes provider to crash [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

2024-02-19 Thread via GitHub
rohityadavcloud commented on issue #42: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/42#issuecomment-1953093216 Fixed by https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/43 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

Re: [I] Using display_text as a filter in template data-source causes provider to crash [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

2024-02-19 Thread via GitHub
rohityadavcloud closed issue #42: Using display_text as a filter in template data-source causes provider to crash URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/42 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

Re: [PR] Add UEFI support [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

2024-02-19 Thread via GitHub
rohityadavcloud commented on code in PR #83: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/83#discussion_r1494973592 ## cloudstack/resource_cloudstack_instance.go: ## @@ -277,6 +283,11 @@ func resourceCloudStackInstanceCreate(d *schema.ResourceData, meta

Re: [PR] Adding attach volume resource [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

2024-02-19 Thread via GitHub
rohityadavcloud closed pull request #76: Adding attach volume resource URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/76 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the

RE: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

2024-02-19 Thread Paul Angus
Hi Daan, Can you clarify what we are actually voting on please. In thread that is linked I've seen: "[the vote] will be to adjust to the semantic versioning system." - you can't go to 20 AND keep semantic versioning. The act of going to 20 breaks semantic versioning [1]. " drop the 4 at

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

2024-02-19 Thread Nicolas Vazquez
+1 Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Daan Hoogland Date: Monday, 19 February 2024 at 09:50 To: dev Cc: users Subject: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20 LS, This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be counted please reply to dev@. As discussed in [1] we are

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

2024-02-19 Thread Andrija Panic
+1 On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 13:50, Daan Hoogland wrote: > LS, > > This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be > counted please reply to dev@. > > As discussed in [1] we are deciding to drop the 4 from our versioning > scheme. The result would be that the next major

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

2024-02-19 Thread Abhishek Kumar
+1 On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 18:20, Daan Hoogland wrote: > LS, > > This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be > counted please reply to dev@. > > As discussed in [1] we are deciding to drop the 4 from our versioning > scheme. The result would be that the next major

ha check running with disabled ha

2024-02-19 Thread me
Hi all, we encountered a strange issue today in our lab installation. We are running CS 4.19.0 upgraded from CS 4.18.1 with linstor as primary storage. We are using a linstor jar file provided by Linbit which is not the default one in 4.19.0! This plugin already implemented the feature to use

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

2024-02-19 Thread Rohit Yadav
+1 Regards. From: m...@swen.io Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 18:29 To: 'dev' Subject: AW: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20 +1 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Daan Hoogland Gesendet: Montag, 19. Februar 2024 13:50 An: dev Cc: users

AW: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

2024-02-19 Thread me
+1 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Daan Hoogland Gesendet: Montag, 19. Februar 2024 13:50 An: dev Cc: users Betreff: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20 LS, This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be counted please reply to dev@. As discussed in [1] we

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

2024-02-19 Thread Wido den Hollander
+1 Op 19/02/2024 om 13:49 schreef Daan Hoogland: LS, This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be counted please reply to dev@. As discussed in [1] we are deciding to drop the 4 from our versioning scheme. The result would be that the next major version will be 20

RE: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

2024-02-19 Thread Alex Mattioli
+1 -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 1:50 PM To: dev Cc: users Subject: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20 LS, This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be counted please reply to dev@. As discussed in [1] we

[VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

2024-02-19 Thread Daan Hoogland
LS, This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be counted please reply to dev@. As discussed in [1] we are deciding to drop the 4 from our versioning scheme. The result would be that the next major version will be 20 instead of 4.20, as it would be in a traditional

Re: [I] New release? [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

2024-02-19 Thread via GitHub
rohityadavcloud commented on issue #85: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/85#issuecomment-1952353124 Hi @CodeBleu thanks for the issue and welcome to opensource! To be clear this sub-project and the parent project are only under the control of the ASF and

Re: [I] New release? [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

2024-02-19 Thread via GitHub
rohityadavcloud closed issue #85: New release? URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/85 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

Community Events this Week

2024-02-19 Thread Ivet Petrova
Hi all, I am writing to remind that the CloudStack community has two upcoming events this week: - CloudStack and Ceph Day Netherlands on Feb 22nd - event is sold out, but if someone still wants to attend, please ping me on email to add you to the list. Event