Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1876
travis failure not related. merging
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1818#discussion_r100771599
--- Diff: ui/scripts/templates.js ---
@@ -1447,7 +1447,11 @@
label
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1847
@anshul1886 can you and @nvazquez work together and create a single PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1876
merging. simple config change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1183
failures are note related. merging
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/928#discussion_r100753379
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/template/TemplateAdapterBase.java ---
@@ -293,9 +298,15 @@ public TemplateProfile
prepare(GetUploadParamsForTemplateCmd
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1938
@borisstoyanov can you post ubuntu test results?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
I planning to create first RC end of feb(in 20 days).
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On February 10, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Daan Hoogland
(daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
sorry to keep you guys waiting, I am struggling my way back in
and am working on this (and a lot) will keep
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1282
@Slair1 Its missing required reviews and tests.(We have a huge backlog. any
help in code review/test run is welcome). please refer to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1727
Its an enhancement. It should be for the next major release which is
4.10(on master branch)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1697
I think the conflicts were on VolumeOrchestrator.java and
TemplateManagerImplTest.java
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Hi all,
All the apidocs builds[1] are failing after the recent java 8
change. Can anyone having access fix it? Or should we talk to
INFRA about it?
Error message:
[INFO]
-
[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : [INFO]
I added two:
CLOUDSTACK-8310 - commit to commit db upgrades and db version
control
CLOUDSTACK-9777 - decouple cloudstack UI
Thanks,
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On February 9, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Rafael Weingärtner
(rafaelweingart...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi guys,
Do you find
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/844
merging
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1697
@nathanejohnson @kiwiflyer There were some conflicts while merging to
master. I went ahead and resolved as they are minor conflicts. Please verify
that everything is fine on master
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1697
merging this to 4.9+ branches
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1644
A separate PR for master is not required. #1697 will be forward merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905
Thanks for the clarification. Its a nice enhancement. LGTM for the changes.
Marvin tests are always welcome :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1892
trivial. merged
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
@milamber I will soon merge the localization PRs
@will Yes. that would be great addition to 4.10. Its pending from
a long time.
@sergey 1913 has open questions. Can you answer them please? rest
I will take a look.
PS: based on the pattern(17*[0,2,4,8,]7) I also checked 1707. I
will add it to my
Hi all,
If you know of any PRs which meet the below criteria, please mail them to
me.
1. No open questions.
2. Has two LGTMs
3. Has CI test results.
~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1913
@sateesh-chodapuneedi @SudharmaJain Can you provide your feedback? I think
you guys worked on a similar fix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905
Hi @nvazquez
Did the behavior in step2 change with this PR or is it same as earlier?
Can you please add the testing already done?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1890
LGTM merging
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1913
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-60u2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1871
merging this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1913
@blueorangutan help
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1890
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1871
@rhtyd thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1890
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1871
@rhtyd can you post the results of the previous test run?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1900
@ProjectMoon @anshul1886 #1898 and #1900 are for the same bug. Can you
please collaborate and put a single PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1898
@ProjectMoon @anshul1886 you are working on the same bug. Can you please
collaborate and put a single PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1847
@sateesh-chodapuneedi @anshul1886 @mike-tutkowski
whats the relation with #1735? Is one of them required or both?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1921
docker specific. merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1920
+1 merging
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905
There are some conflicts after the latest merge. Can you resolve them?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/977
great effort from everyone in terms of code, testing and discussion.
Overall, all the comments are addressed and has test runs. I am merging this
now.
---
If your project is set up
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700
LGTM. Test results are good. I am merging this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
LGTM. From the discussion, looks like the test failures are unrelated to
this PR. merging this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1904
LGTM merging now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
kow...@netapp.com>
wrote:
Hi Rajani,
I’m not sure when you’ll be building your list of PRs to put
into 4.10, but
could you consider this one (it addresses an issue that went
into 4.10 with
PR 1600)?
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
Thanks!
Mike
On 1/24/17, 4:49 PM, "Raja
://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On January 19, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Simon Weller (swel...@ena.com)
wrote:
Great, thanks Rajani!
From: Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 1:15 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: RM for 4.10/maste
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1241
@blueorangutan help
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Yes. thats true. Offlate I was busy with $dayjob activities and
wasnt able to give it enough time.
Starting next week, I will start working on it.
@Rohit, Is it possible to give me access to run CI?
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On January 18, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Simon Weller
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1888
code LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
+1 (binding)
Did basic manual tests(create templates, launch vm, networks
etc.) on fresh install of 4.9.2 with xen 6.2
Did not see any issues.
Thanks,
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On January 3, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Rohit Yadav (bhais...@apache.org)
wrote:
Hi All,
I've created
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1841
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-60u2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1841
@blueorangutan help
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1832
@rhtyd I dont buy that argument. Just for the ease of revert or cherry-pick
we shouldnt commit all the changes together. The revert or cherry-pick quickly
becomes irrelevant as more code gets
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1880
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1849
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1880
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1879
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1879
@blueorangutan help
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
you are in
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On December 21, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Adwait Patankar
(adwait_patan...@accelerite.com) wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to assign a bug in Jira to myself. However, it
doesn't look like I have the appropriate permissions.
Can someone please grant the
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1832
@marcaurele out for the next three days. will get back
@rhtyd marvin test is in progress. I will take it up in a separate PR.
Regarding squashing, a humongous commit would be difficult
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1832
@marcaurele The thread which is running the job gets killed due to
OperationCancelledException. But, if any command is already sent and is being
executed on hypervisor, that wont be cancelled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/873
@rhtyd will do in coming days (though I dont see a reason for the stress on
log message leaving aside logic)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1832
cloudstack-9652 Job framework - Cancelling async jobs
enabled cancellation of long running or subsequent queued up async jobs
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@blueorangutan test centos7 xenserver-65sp1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@blueorangutan help
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
Yes. I think its ready code wise. since the last test run, lot of code
changes happened. If we can run one more round of tests, that would be good.
regarding squashing,
Please
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1818
CLOUDSTACK-9655 The template which is registered in all zones will be
deleted by deleting 1 template on any zone
added extra warning message if it's a cross-zone template
you should be able to assign now.
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On December 6, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Rashmi Dixit
(rashmi_di...@accelerite.com) wrote:
Hi,
I created a bug in JIRA and would like to assign it to myself.
However, it doesn't look like I have the appropriate rights. Can
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
managed to create a PR by clicking more buttons.. somehow, it didn't show
your fork on search
https://github.com/syed/cloudstack/pull/6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@syed I cannot find your repo to create a PR.
I updated the changes Here
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1809
@rhtyd in progress
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1809
CLOUDSTACK-9646: No usage is generated for uploaded templates/volumes from
local
published usage events on successful upload of template or volume.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/828
@blueorangutan test centos6 vmware-55u3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/828
@blueorangutan help
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1794
added more guest os
centos 6.6, centos 6.7, rhel 6.6, rhel 6.7, windows server 2016, rhel
7.2, centos 7.2
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1578
none of the test failures are related and it has enough LGTMs. I am merging
this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1578
@rhtyd Can you comment on the test failures? looks like the failures are
not related to this pr.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
Thanks @mike-tutkowski. Will take a look at #1749
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1745
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1745
@blueorangutan help
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1745
@blueorangutan test matrix component/test_routers.py
component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py component/test_add_remove_network.py
component/test_network_offering.py component
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/873
I tried rebasing to 4.8 but there were conflicts. rebased it against 4.9
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
Looks like all the issues are resolved and the tests are good. I am merging
this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1739
PR #1711 has this and bunch of other changes needed for XS7 support.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
reran the test for delete account and it passes.
`Test for delete account ... === TestName: test_delete_account | Status :
SUCCESS ===
ok`
merging this PR now
---
If your project
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
ok. Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1716
@yvsubhash Can you check why travis failed? (force push to re run it if its
a false alarm)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
@rhtyd any update on the tests?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
yes. I am merging this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1451
Code LGTM.
BVTs are good(iso failures are URL access issues and not related to this
PR).
merging this now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
@blueorangutan @rhtyd any update on the tests? Is the job running?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-60u2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
@blueorangutan help
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
It is now fwd merged to all the branches. Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@blueorangutan @rhtyd How are we on this PR? are the failures related? Or
can I go ahead and merge this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
This is pushed to 4.8 but not merged fwd.
looks like 4.8 is not fwd merged for some commits and there are conflicts
now. Need to investigate further. Will continue on monday.
---
If your
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Iso failures are due to URL access issues. All good here. merging this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
201 - 300 of 1399 matches
Mail list logo
