Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
Looks good now. Not sure what's up with Jenkins though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user ProjectMoon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r110848750
--- Diff: setup/db/db/schema-4920to41000.sql ---
@@ -230,5 +230,11 @@ JOIN `cloud`.`vm_snapshots` s ON
(s.service_offering_id = o.id AND s.vm_id
Github user ProjectMoon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r110849362
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/router/CommandSetupHelper.java ---
@@ -848,13 +849,38 @@ public int compare(final PublicIpAddress o1, final
Github user ProjectMoon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r110848709
--- Diff: setup/db/db/schema-4920to41000.sql ---
@@ -230,5 +230,11 @@ JOIN `cloud`.`vm_snapshots` s ON
(s.service_offering_id = o.id AND s.vm_id
Github user ProjectMoon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r110113725
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
---
@@ -625,15 +627,20 @@ protected
Github user ProjectMoon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r106855504
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java
---
@@ -1764,9 +1765,12 @@ protected
Github user ProjectMoon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r106856634
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/router/CommandSetupHelper.java ---
@@ -848,13 +849,37 @@ public int compare(final PublicIpAddress o1, final
Github user ProjectMoon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r106855300
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
---
@@ -625,15 +627,20 @@ protected
Github user ProjectMoon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r106857110
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/router/CommandSetupHelper.java ---
@@ -848,13 +849,37 @@ public int compare(final PublicIpAddress o1, final
Github user ProjectMoon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r105130816
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
---
@@ -625,15 +627,20 @@ protected
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
Hi, that's great news.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
@jayapalu Quite possible, yes. It could be fixed by adding another
condition to the check that was added with #1907. It could also be "fixed" by
checkiing if `configured()` ret
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
We have been testing this PR internally for some time now, and we have seen
some strange `arping` issues. We have seen that `/etc/cloudstack/ips.json` on
the router has IPs on them
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
I'm looking at the `DataBag` code, and it seems that it loads information
from the data located at `/etc/cloudstack/` and therefore 1907 should work fine
with this, ASSUMING that is smart
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
Question: would #1907 be relevant to this? That change relied on sending
all the IPs to the router, but under this change, we will be sending one at a
time.
---
If your project is set up
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1948
Updated with the JIRA ticket.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1948
We have not entered one into JIRA, no. But we can.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user ProjectMoon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r101736186
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/router/CommandSetupHelper.java ---
@@ -175,6 +176,8 @@
@Inject
private IPAddressDao
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1943
I didn't actually find the other PR, otherwise I probably wouldn't have
submitted this one. But I do think this is cleaner, and more centralized.
There's no real harm in having both
GitHub user ProjectMoon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1948
Faster IP in subnet check
This change removes the conversion from IPNetwork to list in one of the
router scripts. This makes the router faster at processing static NAT rules,
which can
GitHub user ProjectMoon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1943
CLOUDSTACK-9339: Send correct network type to router config
This forces the network type (nw_type) of the IP address being sent into
router configuration scripts to be lowercase. All
Github user ProjectMoon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r100535848
--- Diff: setup/db/db/schema-4920to41000.sql ---
@@ -62,3 +62,4 @@ INSERT INTO `cloud`.`role_permissions` (`uuid`,
`role_id`, `rule`, `permission
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1898
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1898
Closed in favor of #1900
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1900
@anshul1886 I have not delved too deeply into the state machine transition
code, though I understand the basics of how it works. I think `synchronized` +
state transition should be enough
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1900
@anshul1886 I am fine with putting both commits on either PR. If you are
unopposed we can just stick it on mine?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1623
Closed in favor of https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1623
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
Thanks for adding the missing parts. Here is the PR that was open against
4.8 for this, which I guess can be closed now:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1623
I guess
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1450
@jayapalu Can you post this in the new version of the fix? (And possibly
re-test, if you were using an older version)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
GitHub user ProjectMoon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1898
CLOUDSTACK-8862: Lock on volume before attempting to attach it.
It is possible to attach a single volume to multiple instances by running
the commands close to one another. In KVM
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1617
We are in the process of fixing the conflicts. The rebase worked fine, but
we have to rewrite one of the new unit tests to not use the `UsageEventEmitter`.
---
If your project is set up
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1566
Updated to latest master, and a JIRA ticket now exists.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9645
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Updated to latest master, and a JIRA ticket has been created.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9644
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1618
Updated to latest master, and now with a JIRA ticket.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9643
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1559
@rhtyd, in my opinion the two commits are functionally separate enough that
they should remain separate (and this might have been asked for in one of the
various previous incarnations
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1618
Code review issues have been addressed, with the exception of combining the
Guest OS ID/VM Instance ID into a join method on VolumeDao. There was some
compilation failure in the F5 plugin
Github user ProjectMoon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1618#discussion_r89097671
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseHelper.java ---
@@ -157,6 +156,7 @@
import org.apache.cloudstack.usage.Usage;
import
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1559
Addressed the comments. For some reason the tests for VolumeDataFactoryImpl
were being skipped. Will try to see why.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1559
Updated to latest 4.8. Will also address the comments too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1618
Rebased to latest master. The comments will also be addressed soon,
hopefully.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Rebased to latest master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1623
Updated to latest 4.8.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1566
Rebased to latest master. Should probably rebuild the packages.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1744
In the JIRA ticket, it's at least reported that this is happening on 4.8 as
well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1607
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1607
Closed in favor of #1746.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user ProjectMoon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1746
SSVM downloader now handles redirects properly.
New version of #1607, opened against 4.9 so it can be forward merged.
**Original Description**
Previously it was using
GitHub user ProjectMoon reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
This pull request adds a bits field for template size, and sets it equal to
ISO size.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Build failed due to running out of disk space. Will re-trigger.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user ProjectMoon reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
This pull request adds a bits field for template size, and sets it equal to
ISO size.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
This has been rebased to the latest master, and the code review suggestions
applied.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1623
This one hasn't been rebased in quite a while, so the packages produced
will be rather old. Going to rebase this against latest 4.8.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
The commits have been squashed, commit message updated to make sense (I
think; let me know if it's not right), and rebased against latest 4.8.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1607
This one hasn't been rebased in quite a while, so the packages produced
will be rather old. Going to rebase this against latest master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
No code changes, just updating the commits under it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
This branch has been rebased to latest 4.8.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1559
Looks like Travis worked this time.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user ProjectMoon reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1559
CLOUDSTACK-9280: System VM volumes can be expunged if no SSVM exists.
This commit adds a special SSVM endpoint which simply returns true for
all operations sent to it, without
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1559
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1559
The OOBM power off test keeps failing. I've run the test locally with the
simulator and it succeeds fine. Going to try to kick Travis again to see if it
works (third time's the charm
GitHub user ProjectMoon reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1559
CLOUDSTACK-9280: System VM volumes can be expunged if no SSVM exists.
This commit adds a special SSVM endpoint which simply returns true for
all operations sent to it, without
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1559
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1559
This pull request has been updated with another commit that fixes a bug
where volumes cannot be expunged because the loading of the volume fails to
find a primary data store (despite
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user ProjectMoon reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Fixes regarding VOLUME_DELETE events resulting from account deletion
New version of #1491.
**Original Description**
New version of #1373, but updated for the 4.7 branch
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
We can have someone test it. Are you looking for results of a manual test,
reproduction tests, or something automated? A manual test is probably the best
from our side because we don't
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Looks like it's ready for merging now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
The pull request has been rebased.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Alright. I'll rebase it once #1654 has been merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Have rebased to latest 4.8. Travis build failed with what looks like
`Unable to execute
/home/travis/build/apache/cloudstack/developer/target/db/templates.simulator.sql:
Unknown column
GitHub user ProjectMoon reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Fixes regarding VOLUME_DELETE events resulting from account deletion
New version of #1491.
**Original Description**
New version of #1373, but updated for the 4.7 branch
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Jenkins build log has vanished into 404 oblivion. Will see what happened
with Travis (https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/builds/154436801).
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1623
Yeah. Unfortunately I have not had any time to work on the pull requests
lately. When I have time I will reopen it against 4.9.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1635
All hypervisors are affected by this, since the parameter is just not
passed into the VM Manager. That means its effects don't work at all anywhere.
:) I will try to review it to tomorrow
GitHub user ProjectMoon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1661
Export UUID for zone creation event completion.
Action events have support for exporting their "first class entities" over
the event bus, if it's turned on. This wo
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Has been rebased against latest 4.8 and the `TODO` comments removed. The
map was left alone though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user ProjectMoon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624#discussion_r75853547
--- Diff: server/test/com/cloud/user/AccountManagerImplTest.java ---
@@ -231,6 +253,73 @@ public void cleanup() {
CallContext.unregister
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1623
It's been amended and rebased. I still haven't had time to add a new DAO
method to the IP address DAO. I can work on that now though. When is the RC
being cut?
---
If your project is set
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1632
I thought it was: new features -> master, bug fixes -> oldest supported
release branch? 4.7 is no longer supported but as far as I know 4.8 is still
supported (I could be
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1632
It goes all the way back to 4.7. Isn't the oldest supported release
currently 4.8 at the moment? If so, it should be opened against 4.8, right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Rebased to latest master, though I still haven't checked into the Jenkins
issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
GitHub user ProjectMoon reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1618
Now returning os info with the list snapshot response
This commit adds the ID and display name of the OS on the volume.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running
GitHub user ProjectMoon reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1617
Changed UsageEventUtils to UsageEventEmitter and made it injectable
An updated version of #1191, against the master branch. This also updates
the HypervisorTemplateAdapter test slightly
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1618
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1617
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Will check it out on Monday. Very weird that the end of the build is not an
error specifically. Just "ending due to build failure" or some such.
The first excep
GitHub user ProjectMoon reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Adding missing bits field to TemplateResponse
This pull request adds a bits field for template size, and sets it equal to
ISO size.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user ProjectMoon reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1607
SSVM downloader now handles redirects properly.
Previously it was using the HttpClient to make an initial request to an
ISO. This would follow redirects. Then it would make another
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1607
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
Will check the smoke tests for Marvin.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1623
JIRA ticket is CLOUDSTACK-9317. Have not run the Marvin tests, but will do
so.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user ProjectMoon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1623#discussion_r73664374
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/IpAddressManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1698,6 +1698,22 @@ public String acquireGuestIpAddress(Network network
GitHub user ProjectMoon reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1607
SSVM downloader now handles redirects properly.
Previously it was using the HttpClient to make an initial request to an
ISO. This would follow redirects. Then it would make another
Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1607
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user ProjectMoon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1624
Fixes regarding VOLUME_DELETE events resulting from account deletion
New version of #1491.
**Original Description**
New version of #1373, but updated for the 4.7 branch
1 - 100 of 268 matches
Mail list logo
