Re: External fork of Cloudstack

2016-03-19 Thread Sam Ruby
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:39 PM, sebgoa <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 18, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> >> I'm more concerned that the page is indistinguishable from a fork, and >> gives no indication of offi

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

2016-03-19 Thread Sam Ruby
> > > On Mar 19, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > > > > The initial action (creating the fork) was not clearly done by the PMC > > as a whole, that is now being rectified by a retroactive vote being > > taken. Even that I wouldn't sug

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

2016-03-19 Thread Sam Ruby
ot (there are elections coming up this week), feel free to reach out to me directly. And I'm confident that each and every one of the current Directors would make exactly this same offer. > Ian - Sam Ruby > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: &g

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

2016-03-19 Thread Sam Ruby
te my suspicion > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > ... > > >> Despite this clear failure of the board, I would suggest that the >> CloudStack team alert the board before taking such an action again. >> >> I don

Re: External fork of Cloudstack (was Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Is the project attempting a fork on Githu...)

2016-03-19 Thread Sam Ruby
this clear failure of the board, I would suggest that the CloudStack team alert the board before taking such an action again. - Sam Ruby

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

2016-03-19 Thread Sam Ruby
ies hosted on GitHub. I'd like to pursue the latter, and if there are any obstacles (technical or otherwise) would like help flatten those issues. - Sam Ruby > I will review what is being done with Whimsy to get a better idea how that > project is being handled. > > Thanks again for

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

2016-03-19 Thread Sam Ruby
n is an issue, then having multiple GitHub organizations needs to be explored as an option. How can I help? I'd like to bring this proposal back to the board for wider review so that nothing important is missed. If there are issues that come up, I will help flatten them. - Sam Ruby

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

2016-03-19 Thread Sam Ruby
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote: > > I think we are on the same page. I think we just need to start ironing out > the actual logistical and technical details for how to move forward. +1 - Sam Ruby

Re: External fork of Cloudstack

2016-03-18 Thread Sam Ruby
>> How can I help? I'd like to bring this proposal back to the board for wider >> review so that nothing important is missed. If there are issues that come >> up, I will help flatten them. > > Thanks for being open and offering to help. > Indeed let’s figure this out. Thanks! - Sam Ruby