[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1637: Command route not available on CentOS 7

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1637 @lmrv ping --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1637: Command route not available on CentOS 7

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1637 @lmrv ping, can you squash your changes, get a JIRA ticket for this and use the JIRA id in the git summary, thanks. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1637: Command route not available on CentOS 7

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1637 @lmrv ping --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1637: Command route not available on CentOS 7

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1637 @lmrv can you squash your changes and rebase against latest master, I can help run tests on your PR. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1637: Command route not available on CentOS 7

Github user lmrv commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1637 Hi Resmo, Correct. Most net commands are now replace by the ip command. ip link set dev eth0 up ip route ip add etc. In our case, the ifconfig is not used by

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1637: Command route not available on CentOS 7

Github user resmo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1637 speaking about things not available per default on CentOS 7 --> `ifconfig`. Found 1 or 2 of these as well. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1637: Command route not available on CentOS 7

Github user lmrv commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1637 I will need your help John. Ok for JIRA ticket but I don't know how to squash my commits, how to retarget my pull request. I am not confortable at all with github. And for Jenkis, no

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1637: Command route not available on CentOS 7

Github user lmrv commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1637 Hi John, I just create the JIRA ISSUE : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9501 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1637: Command route not available on CentOS 7

Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1637 @lmrv I would like to include this PR in the upcoming 4.8.2.0, 4.9.1.0, and 4.10.0.0 releases. In order to merge it, the following items need to be addressed: * [ ] Squash commits

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1637: Command route not available on CentOS 7

Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1637 @lmrv does this defect impact 4.9 as well? If so, could you please re-target this PR to the 4.9 branch? Also, why is there a merge commit in this PR? --- If your project is set up