Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

From: Rohit Yadav <ro...@apache.org> Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 10:57:17 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2] Hi All, The vote for CloudSt

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

__ > From: Rohit Yadav <ro...@apache.org> > Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 10:57:17 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2] > > Hi All, > &

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

oudstack.apache.org> From: Rohit Yadav <ro...@apache.org> Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 10:57:17 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2] Hi All,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

e.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2] Hi All, The vote for CloudStack 4.11.0.0 *passes* with 4 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) 2 person (Mike, Daan, Wido, Rohit) +1 (non binding) 2 person (Lucian, Boris) 0 none -1 none Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

Hi All, The vote for CloudStack 4.11.0.0 *passes* with 4 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) 2 person (Mike, Daan, Wido, Rohit) +1 (non binding) 2 person (Lucian, Boris) 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 48

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

ense checks and > regression tests against Travis/simulator. > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > > From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> > Sent: Saturday, February 3, 2018 6:49:47 PM > To: dev@

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

/simulator. - Rohit <https://cloudstack.apache.org> From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> Sent: Saturday, February 3, 2018 6:49:47 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2] +1 (binding) It too

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

+1 (binding) It took me a while to test everything with Basic Networking and Ubuntu 16.04, but my tests were all positive. Wido On 01/26/2018 01:19 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.11.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

uary 31, 2018 2:52:41 PM > To: dev > Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2] > > did package verification with all three sig files and including my own > monkeying and Boris testing; > +1 (binding) > > > rohit.ya...

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

Mike - is that a binding +1 vote? Regards. From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 2:52:41 PM To: dev Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2] did package verifi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

did package verification with all three sig files and including my own monkeying and Boris testing; +1 (binding) On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.11.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for > testing and a vote: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

Hi, I am +1 on RC2. Here is the list of tests I ran for RC1: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2416#issuecomment-359220967 In that RC, I found one blocker, which has been fixed and included in RC2. I went through the list of new commits for RC2 and I didn’t see anything in them to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

.com> > To: "dev" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > Cc: "users" <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> > Sent: Friday, 26 January, 2018 17:48:24 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2] > Hi all, > > I’ve done upgrade testing on the follo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

ot;users" <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> > Sent: Friday, 26 January, 2018 17:48:24 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2] > Hi all, > > I’ve done upgrade testing on the following platform matrix: > > > OS and Hypervisor \ ACS Version 4.5

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

Hi all, I’ve done upgrade testing on the following platform matrix: OS and Hypervisor \ ACS Version 4.5 → 4.11 4.6 → 4.11 4.9 → 4.11 M: CentOS6 H: CentOS 6 ✔ M: CentOS6 H: XS65sp1 ✔ M: CentOS6 H: VMware 5.5u3 ✔ M: CentOS7 H: CentOS 7 ✔ M: CentOS7 H:

[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

Hi All, I've created a 4.11.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.0.0-RC20180126T1313 Commit: 5dada1f7ed5fb6a8ee261c763f744583e586f8bf Source release

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

works.net> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 2:08:40 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) I found and fixed an issue in cloudstack-agent logrotate. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10255 https://github.com/apache/cloudsta

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

e approaching the end of the week, it's likely we cut RC2 on > Monday. Please continue testing RC1 in the meanwhile. > > > Regards, > > Rohit Yadav > > > > From: Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 9:29:21 AM &g

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

From: Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 9:29:21 AM To: users Cc: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Paul, Ok, let me play some more with those tunings params, see if I can find a satisfactory combination and I'll withhol

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Message - > From: "Paul Angus" <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> > To: "users" <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> > Cc: "dev" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > Sent: Tuesday, 23 January, 2018 19:55:01 > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 23 January 2018 19:08 To: users <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> Cc: dev <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Hi Paul, To be honest I do not remember when I last saw this, as I have not been testing ACS in

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

- > From: "Paul Angus" <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> > To: "users" <us...@cloudstack.apache.org>, "dev" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > Sent: Tuesday, 23 January, 2018 16:02:54 > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > Hi Nux, >

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 23 January 2018 15:06 To: dev <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Cc: users <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Rohit, I'll also have to insist with the VM HA issue. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10246 Lucian

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

t; > To: "dev" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>, "users" <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> > Sent: Tuesday, 23 January, 2018 14:28:34 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > All, > > > Given we've outstanding blockers and PRs in review/t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) The same issue applies to any 4.9, 4.10 release. In case of 4.9, we had discussed this as a doc bug and so it must be documented part of the 4.11 release notes as well. There are two ways admin can migrate to dynamic roles post-upgrade:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

2, 2018 9:24:25 AM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Daan Hoogland Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) If I've understood the issue correctly, "not being able to log in if upgrading from 4.5" is a blocker in my book. I don't t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

t Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Daan > Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > > Hi Paul, > Migration script considers only what’s in the command.properties file, so if > the ‘missin

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

January 2018 09:27 > To: users <us...@cloudstack.apache.org>; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Paul > Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > > > Hi Bobby, > > > > Agree, it's not user-friendly which is

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2018 4:29:21 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Hi everyone, I’ve completed running the automated (and, in some cases, manual) tests for managed storage against RC1. With the exce

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

.@cloudstack.apache.org>; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Paul > Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > > > Hi Bobby, > > > > Agree, it's not user-friendly which is why admins should migrate to the >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

ohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > > From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 8:09:50 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ap

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

tkow...@netapp.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 8:09:50 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > > Yes: I definitely won’t be able to complete my regression tests within the 72-hour window. For 4.12, I

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

<boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com>> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 2:51:32 PM To: users Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Hi Rohit, That doesn’t sound much user f

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 8:09:50 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > > Yes: I definitely won’t be able to complete my regression tests within the > 72-hour window. F

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 3:08:05 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users; Paul Angus Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Thanks Rohit, That said I must agree it’s not a blocker but still it definitely should be part of upgrade guide. Bobby. boris.stoya...@s

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

@shapeblue.com<mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com>> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 2:51:32 PM To: users Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Hi Rohit, That doesn’t sound much user friendly what do you think? Ca

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

ue: > > quotaIsEnabled=15 > > > Please continue testing, thanks. > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > > From: Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 6:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

__ > From: Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 6:54:28 PM > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > > I think I’ve hi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Yes: I definitely won’t be able to complete my regression tests within the 72-hour window. For 4.12, I plan to automate the remainder of my tests, but I’m not quite there with 4.11 (the vast majority of managed-storage tests are automated, but not yet all). On 1/17

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

org> From: Kris Sterckx <kris.ster...@nuagenetworks.net> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 7:02:52 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) 4.11.0 looks like an awesome reason ! Special thanks to Rohit ! I vote +0 - I vote for including CLOUDS

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) I think I’ve hit a blocker when upgrading to 4.11 Here’s the jira id: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10236 I’ve upgraded from 4.5 to 4.11, then I’ve logged in with admin and got session expired immediately. Re

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

All, We're currently working on getting 4.11 stood up on hardware for testing. An extension would certainly be helpful to us. From: Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 1:07 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

018 18:24:20 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) > Yes Rohit, tried other browser and I’m not able to login.. > > I’m +1 on the extend but unfortunately -1 cause of this blocker. > > Bobby. > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

m: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com<mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 8:48:28 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Or perhaps just the first RC should hav

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

y 17, 2018 8:48:28 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS) Or perhaps just the first RC should have a longer window? On 1/17/18, 8:12 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: If all of our testing were comple

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Or perhaps just the first RC should have a longer window? On 1/17/18, 8:12 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: If all of our testing were completely in an automated fashion, then I would agree that the 72-hour window is sufficient. However, we don’t have that kind of

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

If all of our testing were completely in an automated fashion, then I would agree that the 72-hour window is sufficient. However, we don’t have that kind of automated coverage and people aren’t always able to immediately begin testing things out like migrating from their version of CloudStack

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

The 72 hours is to make sure all stakeholders had a chance to glance. Testing is supposed to have happened before. We have a culture of testing only after RC-cut which is part of the problem. The long duration of a single test run takes, is another part. And finally, in this case there is the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

On 01/17/2018 03:34 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > People, People, > > a lot of us are busy with meltdown fixes and a full component test takes > about the 72 hours that we have for our voting, I propose to extend the vote > period until at least Monday. +1 I wonder where this 72 hours windows

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

On 01/17/2018 03:34 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: People, People, a lot of us are busy with meltdown fixes and a full component test takes about the 72 hours that we have for our voting, I propose to extend the vote period until at least Monday. Is that a good idea? Yes please :-) I won't be

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Yes: I definitely won’t be able to complete my regression tests within the 72-hour window. For 4.12, I plan to automate the remainder of my tests, but I’m not quite there with 4.11 (the vast majority of managed-storage tests are automated, but not yet all). On 1/17/18, 7:34 AM, "Daan Hoogland"

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

People, People, a lot of us are busy with meltdown fixes and a full component test takes about the 72 hours that we have for our voting, I propose to extend the vote period until at least Monday. Is that a good idea? On 17/01/2018, 14:33, "Kris Sterckx" wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

4.11.0 looks like an awesome reason ! Special thanks to Rohit ! I vote +0 - I vote for including CLOUDSTACK-9749 [1] into 4.11.0 still - And if that is accepted, I vote for including CLOUDSTACK-10233 [2] also (Nuage-internal fix) thanks Kris [1]

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

I think I’ve hit a blocker when upgrading to 4.11 Here’s the jira id: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10236 I’ve upgraded from 4.5 to 4.11, then I’ve logged in with admin and got session expired immediately. Regards, Boris Stoyanov boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com 

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Hi everyone, For the past couple days, I have been running the KVM managed-storage regression-test suite against RC1. With the exception of one issue (more on this below), all of these tests have passed. Tomorrow I plan to start in on the VMware-related managed-storage tests. Once I’ve

[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Hi All, I've created a 4.11.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.0.0-RC20180115T1603 Commit: 1b8a532ba52127f388847690df70e65c6b46f4d4 Source release