Re: Resizing a volume

2016-04-27 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
I opened the following ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9371 From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 7:12 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Resizing a volume It a

Re: Resizing a volume

2016-04-27 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
o: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Resizing a volume I see the problem. It's in storage.js if (jsonObj.hypervisor == "KVM" || jsonObj.hypervisor == "XenServer" || jsonObj.hypervisor == "VMware") { if (jsonObj.state == &q

Re: Resizing a volume

2016-04-27 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
be a GUI developer can fill us in as to what's expected here? From: Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 5:13 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Resizing a volume Here's a pic: http://imgur.com/2k380Yd

Re: Resizing a volume

2016-04-27 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
o: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Resizing a volume Hi Wido, I'm referring to the commands.properties file, where you can set permissions for a given API. However, I see volumeResize has the following setting, which should enable users to access it: resizeVolume=15 Perhaps there'

Re: Resizing a volume

2016-04-27 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
later, Mike From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 1:33 AM To: Tutkowski, Mike; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Resizing a volume > Op 26 april 2016 om 22:37 schreef "Tutkowski, Mike" > <

Re: Resizing a volume

2016-04-27 Thread Wido den Hollander
> Op 26 april 2016 om 22:37 schreef "Tutkowski, Mike" > : > > > ??Hi, > > > I noticed that by default non-admins cannot resize a volume to a different > disk offering. > > > Anyone know why that's the default behavior? I would think that would be an > expected

Resizing a volume

2016-04-26 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
??Hi, I noticed that by default non-admins cannot resize a volume to a different disk offering. Anyone know why that's the default behavior? I would think that would be an expected operation for end users. Thanks, Mike