Re: Some Jira tickets clean up

2017-03-03 Thread sachin patil
Thanks @Rafael, That would really help.

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Tickets closed.
>
> Depending on the tickets, some I marked as closed, others as resolved. I
> also configured the status of some to invalid, others to incomplete, others
> as fixed.
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Volks,
> >
> > It has been almost a week. I am assuming that no one knows about these
> > tickets.
> >
> > In the last years, our workflow has been improved greatly; most of the
> > PRs I see have Jira ticket associated and everything seems to be getting
> > better by the time. However, we have some (a lot?) Jira tickets that seem
> > to be left behind. I think a cleanup from time to time is a good thing.
> >
> >
> > In 48 ours I will close all of the tickets mentioned here. If I close
> > something that should not have been closed, please pardon me ;).
> >
> >
> >
> > After this, I will proceed with a new batch of tickets. Hopefully, in
> some
> > iterations of this process, we can get rid of these forgotten tickets.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
> > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks ;)
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <
> >> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks, Rafael. I uploaded an ISO and walked through the necessary
> parts
> >>> of the wizard. I agree with you that it has been fixed. I commented on
> the
> >>> ticket, then resolved and closed it just now.
> >>>
> >>> On 2/23/17, 12:46 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner" <
> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for taking time to look at this Mike.
> >>> The ticket (CLOUDSTACK-4164
> >>> ) I managed
> >>> to
> >>> check, and I believe it can be closed.
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <
> >>> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Thanks for compiling this list, Rafael!
> >>> >
> >>> > I see I was the reporter for this issue:
> >>> >
> >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164
> >>> >
> >>> > I plan to take a look at it and see what the current state is.
> >>> >
> >>> > On 2/23/17, 10:26 AM, "Rafael Weingärtner" <
> >>> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > Hi folks,
> >>> > I have been reviewing old Jira tickets and we have a bunch
> >>> that can be
> >>> > closed. The following are the ones I have gone through.
> Before
> >>> I close
> >>> > any
> >>> > ticket I would like to check them with you, especially the
> >>> ones from a
> >>> > category called “Seems to be fixed has to be checked”. I will
> >>> be
> >>> > waiting
> >>> > for your feedback before I proceed to close any ticket.
> >>> >
> >>> > - Have a title that does say much and the ticket does not
> have
> >>> a
> >>> > detailed
> >>> > description
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2225
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-917
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-947
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1259
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1441
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1576
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2705
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5793
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > - Already solved
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2532
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6735
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6837
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7161
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8202
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8781
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8817
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9065
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1069
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1460
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1702
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1870
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2075
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2213
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2439
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6009
> >>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5219
> 

Re: Some Jira tickets clean up

2017-03-03 Thread Rafael Weingärtner
Tickets closed.

Depending on the tickets, some I marked as closed, others as resolved. I
also configured the status of some to invalid, others to incomplete, others
as fixed.

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Volks,
>
> It has been almost a week. I am assuming that no one knows about these
> tickets.
>
> In the last years, our workflow has been improved greatly; most of the
> PRs I see have Jira ticket associated and everything seems to be getting
> better by the time. However, we have some (a lot?) Jira tickets that seem
> to be left behind. I think a cleanup from time to time is a good thing.
>
>
> In 48 ours I will close all of the tickets mentioned here. If I close
> something that should not have been closed, please pardon me ;).
>
>
>
> After this, I will proceed with a new batch of tickets. Hopefully, in some
> iterations of this process, we can get rid of these forgotten tickets.
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks ;)
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <
>> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Rafael. I uploaded an ISO and walked through the necessary parts
>>> of the wizard. I agree with you that it has been fixed. I commented on the
>>> ticket, then resolved and closed it just now.
>>>
>>> On 2/23/17, 12:46 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for taking time to look at this Mike.
>>> The ticket (CLOUDSTACK-4164
>>> ) I managed
>>> to
>>> check, and I believe it can be closed.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <
>>> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Thanks for compiling this list, Rafael!
>>> >
>>> > I see I was the reporter for this issue:
>>> >
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164
>>> >
>>> > I plan to take a look at it and see what the current state is.
>>> >
>>> > On 2/23/17, 10:26 AM, "Rafael Weingärtner" <
>>> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi folks,
>>> > I have been reviewing old Jira tickets and we have a bunch
>>> that can be
>>> > closed. The following are the ones I have gone through. Before
>>> I close
>>> > any
>>> > ticket I would like to check them with you, especially the
>>> ones from a
>>> > category called “Seems to be fixed has to be checked”. I will
>>> be
>>> > waiting
>>> > for your feedback before I proceed to close any ticket.
>>> >
>>> > - Have a title that does say much and the ticket does not have
>>> a
>>> > detailed
>>> > description
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2225
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-917
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-947
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1259
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1441
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1576
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2705
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5793
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > - Already solved
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2532
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6735
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6837
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7161
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8202
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8781
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8817
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9065
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1069
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1460
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1702
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1870
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2075
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2213
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2439
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6009
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5219
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4847
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4778
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4238
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164
>>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4071
>>> >  

Re: Some Jira tickets clean up

2017-03-01 Thread Rafael Weingärtner
Volks,

It has been almost a week. I am assuming that no one knows about these
tickets.

In the last years, our workflow has been improved greatly; most of the PRs
I see have Jira ticket associated and everything seems to be getting better
by the time. However, we have some (a lot?) Jira tickets that seem to be
left behind. I think a cleanup from time to time is a good thing.


In 48 ours I will close all of the tickets mentioned here. If I close
something that should not have been closed, please pardon me ;).



After this, I will proceed with a new batch of tickets. Hopefully, in some
iterations of this process, we can get rid of these forgotten tickets.

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks ;)
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Rafael. I uploaded an ISO and walked through the necessary parts
>> of the wizard. I agree with you that it has been fixed. I commented on the
>> ticket, then resolved and closed it just now.
>>
>> On 2/23/17, 12:46 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner" 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for taking time to look at this Mike.
>> The ticket (CLOUDSTACK-4164
>> ) I managed to
>> check, and I believe it can be closed.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <
>> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks for compiling this list, Rafael!
>> >
>> > I see I was the reporter for this issue:
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164
>> >
>> > I plan to take a look at it and see what the current state is.
>> >
>> > On 2/23/17, 10:26 AM, "Rafael Weingärtner" <
>> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi folks,
>> > I have been reviewing old Jira tickets and we have a bunch that
>> can be
>> > closed. The following are the ones I have gone through. Before
>> I close
>> > any
>> > ticket I would like to check them with you, especially the ones
>> from a
>> > category called “Seems to be fixed has to be checked”. I will be
>> > waiting
>> > for your feedback before I proceed to close any ticket.
>> >
>> > - Have a title that does say much and the ticket does not have a
>> > detailed
>> > description
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2225
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-917
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-947
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1259
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1441
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1576
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2705
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5793
>> >
>> >
>> > - Already solved
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2532
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6735
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6837
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7161
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8202
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8781
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8817
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9065
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1069
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1460
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1702
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1870
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2075
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2213
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2439
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6009
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5219
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4847
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4778
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4238
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4071
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4055
>> >
>> > - Seems to be fixed has to be checked (I did not have how to
>> check
>> > these
>> > right now)
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8873
>> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8918
>> > -- 

Re: Some Jira tickets clean up

2017-02-23 Thread Rafael Weingärtner
Thanks ;)

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Tutkowski, Mike 
wrote:

> Thanks, Rafael. I uploaded an ISO and walked through the necessary parts
> of the wizard. I agree with you that it has been fixed. I commented on the
> ticket, then resolved and closed it just now.
>
> On 2/23/17, 12:46 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner" 
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for taking time to look at this Mike.
> The ticket (CLOUDSTACK-4164
> ) I managed to
> check, and I believe it can be closed.
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for compiling this list, Rafael!
> >
> > I see I was the reporter for this issue:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164
> >
> > I plan to take a look at it and see what the current state is.
> >
> > On 2/23/17, 10:26 AM, "Rafael Weingärtner" <
> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> > I have been reviewing old Jira tickets and we have a bunch that
> can be
> > closed. The following are the ones I have gone through. Before I
> close
> > any
> > ticket I would like to check them with you, especially the ones
> from a
> > category called “Seems to be fixed has to be checked”. I will be
> > waiting
> > for your feedback before I proceed to close any ticket.
> >
> > - Have a title that does say much and the ticket does not have a
> > detailed
> > description
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2225
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-917
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-947
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1259
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1441
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1576
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2705
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5793
> >
> >
> > - Already solved
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2532
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6735
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6837
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7161
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8202
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8781
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8817
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9065
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1069
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1460
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1702
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1870
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2075
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2213
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2439
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6009
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5219
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4847
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4778
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4238
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4071
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4055
> >
> > - Seems to be fixed has to be checked (I did not have how to
> check
> > these
> > right now)
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8873
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8918
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-963
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1025
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1177
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1225
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1283
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1284
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1285
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1287
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1442
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1478
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1659
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2215
> > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2436
> > -- 

Re: Some Jira tickets clean up

2017-02-23 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
Thanks, Rafael. I uploaded an ISO and walked through the necessary parts of the 
wizard. I agree with you that it has been fixed. I commented on the ticket, 
then resolved and closed it just now.

On 2/23/17, 12:46 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner"  wrote:

Thanks for taking time to look at this Mike.
The ticket (CLOUDSTACK-4164
) I managed to
check, and I believe it can be closed.

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Tutkowski, Mike 
wrote:

> Thanks for compiling this list, Rafael!
>
> I see I was the reporter for this issue:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164
>
> I plan to take a look at it and see what the current state is.
>
> On 2/23/17, 10:26 AM, "Rafael Weingärtner" 
> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
> I have been reviewing old Jira tickets and we have a bunch that can be
> closed. The following are the ones I have gone through. Before I close
> any
> ticket I would like to check them with you, especially the ones from a
> category called “Seems to be fixed has to be checked”. I will be
> waiting
> for your feedback before I proceed to close any ticket.
>
> - Have a title that does say much and the ticket does not have a
> detailed
> description
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2225
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-917
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-947
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1259
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1441
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1576
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2705
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5793
>
>
> - Already solved
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2532
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6735
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6837
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7161
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8202
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8781
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8817
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9065
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1069
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1460
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1702
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1870
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2075
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2213
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2439
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6009
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5219
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4847
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4778
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4238
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4071
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4055
>
> - Seems to be fixed has to be checked (I did not have how to check
> these
> right now)
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8873
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8918
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-963
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1025
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1177
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1225
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1283
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1284
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1285
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1287
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1442
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1478
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1659
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2215
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2436
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5225
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4883
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4440 (I think
> Nicolás
> may be able to help checking this one)
> -- 

Re: Some Jira tickets clean up

2017-02-23 Thread Rafael Weingärtner
Thanks for taking time to look at this Mike.
The ticket (CLOUDSTACK-4164
) I managed to
check, and I believe it can be closed.

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Tutkowski, Mike 
wrote:

> Thanks for compiling this list, Rafael!
>
> I see I was the reporter for this issue:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164
>
> I plan to take a look at it and see what the current state is.
>
> On 2/23/17, 10:26 AM, "Rafael Weingärtner" 
> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
> I have been reviewing old Jira tickets and we have a bunch that can be
> closed. The following are the ones I have gone through. Before I close
> any
> ticket I would like to check them with you, especially the ones from a
> category called “Seems to be fixed has to be checked”. I will be
> waiting
> for your feedback before I proceed to close any ticket.
>
> - Have a title that does say much and the ticket does not have a
> detailed
> description
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2225
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-917
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-947
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1259
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1441
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1576
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2705
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5793
>
>
> - Already solved
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2532
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6735
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6837
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7161
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8202
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8781
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8817
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9065
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1069
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1460
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1702
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1870
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2075
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2213
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2439
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6009
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5219
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4847
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4778
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4238
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4071
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4055
>
> - Seems to be fixed has to be checked (I did not have how to check
> these
> right now)
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8873
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8918
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-963
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1025
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1177
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1225
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1283
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1284
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1285
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1287
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1442
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1478
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1659
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2215
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2436
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5225
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4883
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4440 (I think
> Nicolás
> may be able to help checking this one)
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3784
>
> - May be able to close after brief discussion/conversation
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7819 (are we
> supposed
> to be able to add tags to projects? Is it working right now?)
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1497 (Do we want
> to
> preserve alien VMs?)
> -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1570 (I did not
> understand if this is a feature that we already have and was only
> lacking
> documentation, or if it is a feature suggestion)
> -- 

Re: Some Jira tickets clean up

2017-02-23 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
Thanks for compiling this list, Rafael!

I see I was the reporter for this issue:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164

I plan to take a look at it and see what the current state is.

On 2/23/17, 10:26 AM, "Rafael Weingärtner"  wrote:

Hi folks,
I have been reviewing old Jira tickets and we have a bunch that can be
closed. The following are the ones I have gone through. Before I close any
ticket I would like to check them with you, especially the ones from a
category called “Seems to be fixed has to be checked”. I will be waiting
for your feedback before I proceed to close any ticket.

- Have a title that does say much and the ticket does not have a detailed
description
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2225
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-917
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-947
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1259
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1441
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1576
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2705
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5793


- Already solved
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2532
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6735
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6837
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7161
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8202
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8781
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8817
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9065
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1069
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1460
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1702
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1870
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2075
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2213
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2439
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6009
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5219
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4847
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4778
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4238
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4071
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4055

- Seems to be fixed has to be checked (I did not have how to check these
right now)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8873
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8918
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-963
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1025
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1177
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1225
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1283
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1284
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1285
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1287
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1442
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1478
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1659
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2215
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2436
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5225
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4883
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4440 (I think Nicolás
may be able to help checking this one)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3784

- May be able to close after brief discussion/conversation
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7819 (are we supposed
to be able to add tags to projects? Is it working right now?)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1497 (Do we want to
preserve alien VMs?)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1570 (I did not
understand if this is a feature that we already have and was only lacking
documentation, or if it is a feature suggestion)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2535 (There is a
discussion one person said some old configuration should be removed and
other said that they should now. However, the discussion stopped there; I
think we can close this)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2616 (Database
connection validation, do we have a config in our connection pool to keep
those connections alive even when idle? Or at least recreate them when they
 

Some Jira tickets clean up

2017-02-23 Thread Rafael Weingärtner
Hi folks,
I have been reviewing old Jira tickets and we have a bunch that can be
closed. The following are the ones I have gone through. Before I close any
ticket I would like to check them with you, especially the ones from a
category called “Seems to be fixed has to be checked”. I will be waiting
for your feedback before I proceed to close any ticket.

- Have a title that does say much and the ticket does not have a detailed
description
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2225
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-917
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-947
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1259
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1441
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1576
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2705
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5793


- Already solved
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2532
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6735
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6837
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7161
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8202
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8781
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8817
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9065
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1069
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1460
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1702
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1870
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2075
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2213
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2439
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6009
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5219
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4847
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4778
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4238
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4071
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4055

- Seems to be fixed has to be checked (I did not have how to check these
right now)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8873
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8918
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-963
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1025
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1177
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1225
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1283
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1284
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1285
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1287
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1442
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1478
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1659
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2215
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2436
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5225
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4883
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4440 (I think Nicolás
may be able to help checking this one)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3784

- May be able to close after brief discussion/conversation
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7819 (are we supposed
to be able to add tags to projects? Is it working right now?)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1497 (Do we want to
preserve alien VMs?)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1570 (I did not
understand if this is a feature that we already have and was only lacking
documentation, or if it is a feature suggestion)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2535 (There is a
discussion one person said some old configuration should be removed and
other said that they should now. However, the discussion stopped there; I
think we can close this)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2616 (Database
connection validation, do we have a config in our connection pool to keep
those connections alive even when idle? Or at least recreate them when they
expire?)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5550 (Is this a
problem? the keys are pretty big; I do not see the need to fully display
the keys. A simple "shift + end" can be used to select the keys and copy
them. Maybe a copy to transfer area button would be better?)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5182 (The pages do not
seem to exist anymore in new documentation page)
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4018 (User entering
invalid information regarding the environment, I do not see this as a bug
(it is a user`s problem))
--