Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

On 7-Dec-03, at 8:37 PM, Antonio Gallardo wrote: Antonio Gallardo dijo: Why Apple fans always try to forgot the fact: Intel or AMD craps are faster in the same space and time than Gx processors? And try to hide this fact it behind the OS arena? I know, in hardware, it is not an MHz. issue. But I

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

Antonio Gallardo dijo: > Why Apple fans always try to forgot the fact: Intel or AMD craps are > faster in the same space and time than Gx processors? And try to hide this > fact it behind the OS arena? I know, in hardware, it is not an MHz. issue. > But Intel and AMD craps are in fact faster and ch

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

On 7-Dec-03, at 7:00 PM, Antonio Gallardo wrote: I'm glad you like your Linux based laptop, the fellow asked if we liked our OSX boxes ... which we do. But for the record I never stop my OSX laptop, so I don't have to restart, (okay for your 1 minute). Then I don't have to restart my database

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

You're both wrong, guys... Mac OS/X is not based on Linux, nor on BSD. It's based on a derivate of CMU's original "Mach" kernel, which was a direct response to a architectural problem of the BSD kernel... Getting closer ... Mach was the name chosen because MOOS sounded wrong and one of the other s

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

Gianugo Rabellino dijo: > Antonio Gallardo wrote: > >> Why a Mac when you can get a more powerful machine with an Intel or AMD >> processor with the same money? > > It's not the same money actually. Have a Mac with you for a few days, > and then start wondering about the time you're saving since th

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

On 8 Dec 2003, at 00:30, Gianugo Rabellino wrote: BTW, Mac OS X is a Linux based distribution for the Mac processors with a price included. They use KDE as the desktop environment. Uh? Come on Antonio, this is just blatantly untrue to say the least: OS X roots are in BSD, not Linux, and KDE has

Re: JXTemplate and FOM

This is needed to provide a consistent interface between the controller and the view. See also: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-users&m=106971256203925&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=106140130601357&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=10614040440

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

Ok, end this thread now or I'll start flaming people! :-) On 8 Dec 2003, at 00:08, Antonio Gallardo wrote: BTW, Mac OS X is a Linux based distribution for the Mac processors with a price included. They use KDE as the desktop environment. Dude, you don't know what you're talking about! :-) :-)

Re: JXTemplate and FOM

Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On 7 Dec 2003, at 12:37, Christopher Oliver wrote: I'd like to change JXTemplate to use a subset of the FOM, namely by providing a variable "cocoon" with the following properties: - request - session - context - continuation Each of these would be a reference to the cor

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

On 7-Dec-03, at 4:08 PM, Antonio Gallardo wrote: BTW, Mac OS X is a Linux based distribution for the Mac processors with a price included. They use KDE as the desktop environment. Sorry, I haven't responded to some other incorrect stuff, but OSX is GNU Mach from NeXT with a FreeBSD personali

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

Antonio Gallardo wrote: Why a Mac when you can get a more powerful machine with an Intel or AMD processor with the same money? It's not the same money actually. Have a Mac with you for a few days, and then start wondering about the time you're saving since thing just work. I did the math: given

Re: JXTemplate and FOM

Hi Christopher: I am relly newbie in JXTemplate. We currently, does not see a needs for this. Can you provide some examples, where it is needed? We use flow and when needed we send the requiered data of the mentioned properties from flow. I think this allow us to have a clean separation of conce

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

Hi: Why a Mac when you can get a more powerful machine with an Intel or AMD processor with the same money? If you concerns are about speed, stability and realibility then use Linux. I currently use Fedora Core 1 with great results. Also you can have the same machine with dual boot just in case yo

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On 7 Dec 2003, at 06:29, Robert Koberg wrote: John Morrison wrote: Hi All, Sorry for the off topic posting, but I've been thinking about upgrading my laptop and you guys have been saying how good the modern Macs are :) I was wondering if you'd tell me which Mac you have

Re: JXTemplate and FOM

On 7 Dec 2003, at 12:37, Christopher Oliver wrote: I'd like to change JXTemplate to use a subset of the FOM, namely by providing a variable "cocoon" with the following properties: - request - session - context - continuation Each of these would be a reference to the corresponding FOM object. Th

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

On 7 Dec 2003, at 09:48, Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu wrote: When you buy a Mac you are literally buying time. This is *S* true -- Stefano. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

On 7 Dec 2003, at 06:29, Robert Koberg wrote: John Morrison wrote: Hi All, Sorry for the off topic posting, but I've been thinking about upgrading my laptop and you guys have been saying how good the modern Macs are :) I was wondering if you'd tell me which Mac you have and whether you'd buy one

Re: Load Balancing web applications with mod_proxy...

On 7-Dec-03, at 11:54 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote: You're talking about failover... Yeah, that's the problem... I've seen too many "AAARRRGGGHHH" when I said the word "Perl", so, the solution proposed by Jules and Greg (Jetty) of doing it in a module might be better... Is there any way to catch the

Re: Load Balancing web applications with mod_proxy...

so I don't think a load balancing approach prevents flow from working. The only issue open is the continuations tree which is stored in a global component and not in the session. IIUC this is a problem in clustered environments, isn't it? (IIRC there was a discussion some weeks ago, Thorsten what d

JXTemplate and FOM

I'd like to change JXTemplate to use a subset of the FOM, namely by providing a variable "cocoon" with the following properties: - request - session - context - continuation Each of these would be a reference to the corresponding FOM object. This will unify the object model of the controller and

Re: Load Balancing web applications with mod_proxy...

On 7 Dec 2003, at 18:27, Reinhard Poetz wrote: From: Geoff Howard No they won't when those are created by sessions. The servlet Container will set a cookie for the "/cocoon/" path... Since the web application is proxied to "/" instead of "/cocoon/" the browser WILL NOT pass back the session ID to

Re: Load Balancing web applications with mod_proxy...

On 7 Dec 2003, at 14:35, Sylvain Wallez wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: It came out recently on [EMAIL PROTECTED] a little "joke" about mod_jk versus mod_proxy, which is better, and so on... Therefore, no fuss, mod_proxy is load balanced, and now my 25 Jetty instances are kicking ass :-) J

Re: Fixing store design (long) (was Re: CocoonForms server sizing?)

Sylvain Wallez wrote: Private caches all over the place - I mentioned above components that pre-analyze files like jxtemplate, woody form definitions, flowscript, etc. Now if we look closer at these components, we see that each of them has its own private cache

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

On 7 Dec 2003, at 18:07, Jorg Heymans wrote: I would've gotten one of these a few months ago, but decided on a winxp instead because i wasn't sure about its "standard office compatibility". I mean can you easily link up to an exchange server? See windows file servers, mount windows directories,

Re: Load Balancing web applications with mod_proxy...

On 7 Dec 2003, at 17:03, Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu wrote: * Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-07 13:56]: On 6 Dec 2003, at 01:22, Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu wrote: * Tony Collen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-04 15:56]: Who needs cookies anyway? :) Cookies will work. So will SSL

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

As a contractor my main bread & butter client is the BC Government in Canada. To save money, the BC Gov't has standardized on M$ Windows for the desktop. They've never actually looked to see if they have saved any money from this decision, but I can tell you about the thousands of work days lo

RE: Load Balancing web applications with mod_proxy...

From: Geoff Howard > > > > No they won't when those are created by sessions. The servlet > > Container > > will set a cookie for the "/cocoon/" path... Since the web > application > > is proxied to "/" instead of "/cocoon/" the browser WILL > NOT pass back > > the session ID to the server..

Re: extending FOM? (was on cocoon-users: Re: Parsing Source into DOM in Flow)

Why not have processPipelineTo take a javax.xml.transform.Result instead of an OutputStream? Guido Casper wrote: Did anyone else also feel the need to have something like processPipelineTo but getting a DOM or just an InputStream instead of just streaming it directly to another OutputStream? Gui

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

I would've gotten one of these a few months ago, but decided on a winxp instead because i wasn't sure about its "standard office compatibility". I mean can you easily link up to an exchange server? See windows file servers, mount windows directories, open/edit/save m$-office word and excel file

Re: Fixing store design (long) (was Re: CocoonForms server sizing?)

Sylvain Wallez wrote: Christian Haul wrote: This is a big problem, indeed. Since many of those actually build their private cache from a source, I have started a SourceCache in the scratchpad block but got distracted :-( Still, maybe it could be useful when cleaning up the private caches. The

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

* John Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-07 11:12]: > Hi All, > > Sorry for the off topic posting, but I've been thinking about > upgrading my laptop and you guys have been saying how good > the modern Macs are :) > > I was wondering if you'd tell me which Mac you have and > whether you'd buy

Re: Load Balancing web applications with mod_proxy...

* Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-07 13:56]: > On 6 Dec 2003, at 01:22, Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu wrote: > > >* Tony Collen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-04 15:56]: > >>Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> > >>>On 4 Dec 2003, at 00:57, Tony Collen wrote: > >>> > It's easy: for each vhos

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25242] - sendmail logicsheet generate syntax error .java

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25242] - sendmail logicsheet generate syntax error .java

Joerg Heinicke wrote: I had no look into the code, but what about applying the particular template only to node()[normalize-space()]? Or copying only $body[normalize-space()] if $body is a node set? This will also produce invalid results (you will be missing spaces you so carefully put in the

Re: Ignore "annotations" namespace in sitemap?

Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: ... I prefer a separate namespace as it clearly makes the documentation and sitemap stuff orthogonal. They *are* separate concerns: note: is for humans, map: is for Cocoon. I think a separate namespace is the logical model for this. Apart from being slightly more com

Re: Load Balancing web applications with mod_proxy...

Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 6 Dec 2003, at 01:22, Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu wrote: * Tony Collen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-04 15:56]: Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 4 Dec 2003, at 00:57, Tony Collen wrote: It's easy: for each vhost, create whatever subsitemaps you want in Cocoon, then in each v

Bug report for Cocoon 2 [2003/12/07]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: extending FOM? (was on cocoon-users: Re: Parsing Source intoDOM in Flow)

Guido Casper wrote: > Did anyone else also feel the need to have something like > processPipelineTo but getting a DOM Yes, I use that quite often, so it would be good if FOM could provide some easier to use functionality for this. We could have a processPipelineToDOM(uri, map) that returns a DOM

Re: Load Balancing web applications with mod_proxy...

Pier Fumagalli wrote: It came out recently on [EMAIL PROTECTED] a little "joke" about mod_jk versus mod_proxy, which is better, and so on... Therefore, no fuss, mod_proxy is load balanced, and now my 25 Jetty instances are kicking ass :-) Just a question: what happens if one of the webap

Re: extending FOM? (was on cocoon-users: Re: Parsing Source into DOM in Flow)

Guido Casper wrote: Did anyone else also feel the need to have something like processPipelineTo but getting a DOM or just an InputStream instead of just streaming it directly to another OutputStream? Rather than extending the FOM, what we need is a helper JS library that is a simple wrapper ar

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

John Morrison wrote: Hi All, Sorry for the off topic posting, but I've been thinking about upgrading my laptop and you guys have been saying how good the modern Macs are :) I was wondering if you'd tell me which Mac you have and whether you'd buy one again :) Thanks, J. PS, I've never owned a M

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

On 7 Dec 2003, at 11:12, John Morrison wrote: Hi All, Sorry for the off topic posting, but I've been thinking about upgrading my laptop and you guys have been saying how good the modern Macs are :) I was wondering if you'd tell me which Mac you have and whether you'd buy one again :) Ohh... And t

Re: Load Balancing web applications with mod_proxy...

On 6 Dec 2003, at 01:22, Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu wrote: * Tony Collen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-04 15:56]: Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 4 Dec 2003, at 00:57, Tony Collen wrote: It's easy: for each vhost, create whatever subsitemaps you want in Cocoon, then in each vhost config in httpd.co

extending FOM? (was on cocoon-users: Re: Parsing Source into DOM in Flow)

Did anyone else also feel the need to have something like processPipelineTo but getting a DOM or just an InputStream instead of just streaming it directly to another OutputStream? Guido Geoff Howard wrote: > Upayavira wrote: >> Maybe my last question was too specific. >> >> I'm trying to parse t

RE: Fixing store design (long) (was Re: CocoonForms server sizing?)

Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > Sylvain Wallez wrote: > ... > > > I just wanted to clearly state the problems and proposed solutions so > > that everybody understands and agrees with them or else yells ;-) > > > All stuff sounds logical (with the exception of maxobjects=100 -- this > is sample sitemap,

Re: [OT] Mac Laptops

Hi John, On 7 Dec 2003, at 11:12, John Morrison wrote: I was wondering if you'd tell me which Mac you have and whether you'd buy one again :) New 15" Powerbook G4. Bought two of them. I would recommend them to anybody, and I would definitely buy them again. Pros: it just works. It's light. Amaz

[OT] Mac Laptops

Hi All, Sorry for the off topic posting, but I've been thinking about upgrading my laptop and you guys have been saying how good the modern Macs are :) I was wondering if you'd tell me which Mac you have and whether you'd buy one again :) Thanks, J. PS, I've never owned a Mac before. PPS, if y

Re: Fixing store design (long) (was Re: CocoonForms server sizing?)

Christian Haul wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: - a transient store: in cocoon.xconf, Store.TRANSIENT_STORE in Java code - a persistent store: , Store.PERSISTANT_STORE which equals Store.ROLE (more on this below) The transient-store, as its name implies, should be transient, and used to cache ob

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25270] New: - cocoonCrawler broken with infinite depth=-1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu