Re:

>Lovely animals New_MP3_Player.cpl Description: Binary data

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30432] - cinclude:cached-include doesn't work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [roadmap] Cocoon 2.2

Sylvain Wallez wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: I also want to split up Cocoon as discussed by Unico and me a few weeks ago (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=109025350512527&w=2) Are you preparing a list of classes which would go to spi /

Re: [roadmap] Cocoon 2.2

Reinhard Poetz wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: I also want to split up Cocoon as discussed by Unico and me a few weeks ago (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=109025350512527&w=2) Are you preparing a list of classes which would go to spi / api / common (core) /

Re: [roadmap] Cocoon 2.2

Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: I also want to split up Cocoon as discussed by Unico and me a few weeks ago (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=109025350512527&w=2) Are you preparing a list of classes which would go to spi / api / common (core) / internal? Or you want

Re: [roadmap] Cocoon 2.2

Reinhard Poetz wrote: I also want to split up Cocoon as discussed by Unico and me a few weeks ago (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=109025350512527&w=2) Are you preparing a list of classes which would go to spi / api / common (core) / internal? Or you want to prepare the list after

Re: [roadmap] Cocoon 2.2

Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: >>> What is a realistic date for the final release? December _this_ year? Then we could have M2 in October, RC1 by the end of November and if necessary a RC2 before the final 2.2 release. WDOT? Not sure a

Re: [roadmap] Cocoon 2.2

Reinhard Poetz wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: >>> What is a realistic date for the final release? December _this_ year? Then we could have M2 in October, RC1 by the end of November and if necessary a RC2 before the final 2.2 release. WDOT? Not sure about others, but it seem

Re: [roadmap] Cocoon 2.2

Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: We have started to discuss the roadmap for 2.2 some time ago and the starting point is in this document: /cocoon/src/documentation/xdocs/plan/roadmap.xml Found also: http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/plan/release.html http://coc

Re: [proposal - take 2] Whiteboard Branches

On 1 Aug 2004, at 14:20, Reinhard Poetz wrote: In order to summarize: - whiteboard The whiteboard can contain revelutionary stuff like Butterfly or other one-man-shows. They needn't be based on the current codebase - they only have to have some relationship to Cocoon. Evolving from whitebo

Re: Status of SVN Conversion!!!

On 2 Aug 2004, at 15:26, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: b) clean up the directory for the new kernel proposal I think the new kernel should only contain the kernel but not the whole cocoon stuff; it's outdated anyway. Most of the stuff we have added to our cocoon-2.2 CVS repo is now in the coco

Re: [roadmap] Cocoon 2.2

Reinhard Poetz wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: We have started to discuss the roadmap for 2.2 some time ago and the starting point is in this document: /cocoon/src/documentation/xdocs/plan/roadmap.xml Found also: http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/plan/release.html http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/plan/

Re: Status of SVN Conversion!!!

Carsten Ziegeler wrote: I think the next steps should be: a) merge things back from 2.2 to the 2.1.x branch Yup. We should backport all bug fixes, especially the fix for the sitemap reloading problem. What do you think about tracing the status of the merge (which block has already, whi

Re: [proposal - take 2] Whiteboard Branches

Il giorno 01/ago/04, alle 15:20, Reinhard Poetz ha scritto: In order to summarize: - whiteboard The whiteboard can contain revelutionary stuff like Butterfly or other one-man-shows. They needn't be based on the current codebase - they only have to have some relationship to Cocoon. Evolving

Re: [proposal - take 2] Whiteboard Branches

Reinhard Poetz wrote: In order to summarize: - whiteboard The whiteboard can contain revelutionary stuff like Butterfly or other one-man-shows. They needn't be based on the current codebase - they only have to have some relationship to Cocoon. Evolving from whiteboard needs a vote. - branch

Reqest object parameters not reaching coplet pipeline (generator) from poortal engine

Hi All, I used the portal-fw block of cocoon in my project. I cofigured the portal to display some coplets. In some of the coplet pipelines, I used a custom generator that depended much on parameters in the reqest object comming from the browser. When I called the coplet pipelines directly from th

RE: Portal Path

Jennifer Yip wrote: > > Is it possible to get a quick outline of where the > development team are heading with Portal Blocks? > As far as I know there are no new things planned for the portal. The current version is running nicely and is used for several websites already. I could imagine that ov

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30432] New: - cinclude:cached-include doesn't work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [roadmap] Cocoon 2.2

Ugo Cei wrote: > Il giorno 02/ago/04, alle 09:19, Carsten Ziegeler ha scritto: > > > But I think we shouldn't forget about 2.1.6; merging all > the nice bug > > fixes we already have in 2.2 into 2.1.x is imho currently as > > important. > > We could dedicate the next FirstFriday (Aug. 6th) t

Portal Path

Is it possible to get a quick outline of where the development team are heading with Portal Blocks? The new portal block does not appear to have any aspects for managing Coplets and or users? Is this likely to happen over next couple of months (or did I miss something)? JetSpeed2 seems like a

Re: [roadmap] Cocoon 2.2

Il giorno 02/ago/04, alle 09:19, Carsten Ziegeler ha scritto: But I think we shouldn't forget about 2.1.6; merging all the nice bug fixes we already have in 2.2 into 2.1.x is imho currently as important. We could dedicate the next FirstFriday (Aug. 6th) to it. WDYT? -- Ugo Cei - http://beblogging.c

RE: [roadmap] Cocoon 2.2

Reinhard Poetz wrote: > > Thank you. > The document doesn't contain a scheduled release date for M1. > I know it's difficult to say when which parts will be ready. > But if we committers say which parts we are working on and > when things will be ready we get a sense for a timeline. > Yes.

Re: [roadmap] Cocoon 2.2

Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: After agreeing on the things that we want to become part of Cocoon 2.2, we should define milestones so that our users have an idea where we want to go and when we think we will arive. Thoughts? We have started to discuss the roadmap for 2.2 s