Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
...
This is why I think we should make an effort to think about how we can
solve this time/cognitive-energy discrepancy between the scripting and
the java try/fail cycle.
+1
In fact, for users, xslt in Cocoon is cool because you get instant
feedback, and the current
Hello
Could someone nudge me in the right direction (i.e. where to start
looking) if i wanted to get a patch in to fix this annoying i18n
required messages problem.
Thanks
Mark
Hello
Could someone nudge me in the right direction (i.e. where to start
looking) if i wanted to get a patch in to fix this annoying i18n
required messages problem.
Thanks
Mark
If you are looking for the i18n of the cforms required message, is already
done in the
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:45:33 +0100, Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you missed the point. 99% of cocoon.xconf belongs in the war
file, hidden away. However, there are a few configuration items such as
the pool sizes that need to be configured when Cocoon is started, not
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33616.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33569.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33603.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Il giorno 16/feb/05, alle 00:32, Stefano Mazzocchi ha scritto:
You can test the input and output of a pipeline, but this is exactly
what I do with my browser when I hit it! Sure I can automate that when
it's ready to know what is broken or not later on, but it's not unit
testing, is functional
I found that, and yes of course I have the message keys added.. You
should try it, practice is usually better than theory. I've seen this
mentioned elsewhere, if its a bug I'd prefer to submit a patch when i
enter it rather than just joining a que.
If you see the form-instance you can found
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33569.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Is it possible to write binary data to the HTTP response directly from
the flow? I have an InputStream available in my flow, and I want to
serve data from that stream directly to the HTTP response. E.g.
cocoon.sendBinaryData(inputStream, application/octet-stream);
Or something similar.
I
Bart Molenkamp wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to write binary data to the HTTP response directly from
the flow? I have an InputStream available in my flow, and I want to
serve data from that stream directly to the HTTP response. E.g.
cocoon.sendBinaryData(inputStream, application/octet-stream);
Or
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
I just fixed the problems with the ojb-block in trunk; haven't checked
if they exist in 2.1.x as well.
The different implementations (PB, ODMG) all inherit from
AbstractOjbImpl that in turn uses a datasource class. This datasource
class is based on static methods. So if
Ralph Goers wrote:
2. I really want thread-safe generators and transformers.
I've glanced at the sitemap code to see what it would take to do item 2
and it didn't seem to me that the code was pretty understandable.
Just so you know, this is already done and implemented.
Remind me to commit
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
2. I really want thread-safe generators and transformers.
I've glanced at the sitemap code to see what it would take to do item
2 and it didn't seem to me that the code was pretty understandable.
Just so you know, this is already done and implemented.
Ralph Goers wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
2. I really want thread-safe generators and transformers.
I've glanced at the sitemap code to see what it would take to do item
2 and it didn't seem to me that the code was pretty understandable.
Just so you know, this is already done
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10958635923r=1
Yeah, this is where I got the idea. Scanning trunk, it doesn't look
like you've actually checked anything in? However, I don't believe the
technique you proposed will always work. The problem is, some
generators
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Have I mentioned that this is for C2.2 only? :-)
Vadim
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10958635923r=1
Forget my previous comment. I don't know what I was thinking. Your
technique works just fine.
Ralph
18 matches
Mail list logo
