Re: svn commit: r160570 - cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/modules/input/ProjectPathModule.java

2005-04-09 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On 8 Apr 2005, at 22:24, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: + *component-instance logger=core.modules.input + * name=myproject + * class=org.apache.cocoon.components.modules.input.ProjectPathModule + * uri-prefixmy/project//uri-prefix + *

[VOTE] Alfred Nathaniel as committer

2005-04-09 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Dear community, Alfred Nathaniel has been around for more than a year at least, and has contributed several patches along the way (grep -i nathaniel status.xml will tell you more), all of good quality. When applying his recent HtmlUnit-based tests patch

Re: [VOTE] Alfred Nathaniel as committer

2005-04-09 Thread Antonio Gallardo
On Sab, 9 de Abril de 2005, 4:10, Bertrand Delacretaz dijo: Please cast your votes: here's my +1 Big +1 and a warm welcome! ;-) Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo

Re: [VOTE] Alfred Nathaniel as committer

2005-04-09 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Please cast your votes: +1 /Daniel

Re: [VOTE] Alfred Nathaniel as committer

2005-04-09 Thread Leszek Gawron
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Dear community, +1 -- Leszek Gawron MobileBox [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mobilebox.pl

Re: [VOTE] Alfred Nathaniel as committer

2005-04-09 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On 9 Apr 2005, at 11:10, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Please cast your votes: here's my +1 And mine +1 Welcome!! regards Jeremy If email from this address is not signed IT IS NOT FROM ME

Re: [VOTE] Alfred Nathaniel as committer

2005-04-09 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Dear community, Alfred Nathaniel has been around for more than a year at least, and has contributed several patches along the way (grep -i nathaniel status.xml will tell you more), all of good quality. When applying his recent HtmlUnit-based tests patch

Re: [VOTE] Alfred Nathaniel as committer

2005-04-09 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: snip/ So, I'm pleased to propose Alfred, should he accept the nomination, as a committer. Please cast your votes: +1! Sylvain -- Sylvain WallezAnyware Technologies http://apache.org/~sylvainhttp://anyware-tech.com Apache Software

Re: [VOTE] Alfred Nathaniel as committer

2005-04-09 Thread Giacomo Pati
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:10:27PM +0200, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: So, I'm pleased to propose Alfred, should he accept the nomination, as a committer. Of course, my secret hope is that he will contribute many additional automated tests, but the committment is to the project, not to a

Re: [VOTE] Alfred Nathaniel as committer

2005-04-09 Thread Ugo Cei
Il giorno 09/apr/05, alle 12:10, Bertrand Delacretaz ha scritto: So, I'm pleased to propose Alfred, should he accept the nomination, as a committer. Of course, my secret hope is that he will contribute many additional automated tests, but the committment is to the project, not to a particular

Re: [VOTE] Alfred Nathaniel as committer

2005-04-09 Thread Geoff Howard
On Apr 9, 2005 6:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear community, ... Please cast your votes: here's my +1 And mine! +1 Geoff

Re: [VOTE] Alfred Nathaniel as committer

2005-04-09 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Dear community, Alfred Nathaniel has been around for more than a year at least, and has contributed several patches along the way (grep -i nathaniel status.xml will tell you more), all of good quality. When applying his recent HtmlUnit-based tests patch

Re: Manually specifying a mounted sub sitemap's context

2005-04-09 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Hi Jochen, your idea sounds good to me. Can you please add a feature request to bugzilla with your patch? Thanks Carsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I suggest a new parameter for map:mount that specifies the context of the sitemap, i.e. the URL against which all relative URLs are resolved.

Re: Manually specifying a mounted sub sitemap's context

2005-04-09 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Hi Jochen, your idea sounds good to me. Can you please add a feature request to bugzilla with your patch? Well, having dynamically generated sitemaps doesn't seem that good to me. About Gianugo's problem: we had a discussion where it appears the sitemap is the

Re: Manually specifying a mounted sub sitemap's context

2005-04-09 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Sylvain Wallez wrote: So, although we may accept a new context attribute (I'm currently -0.9 for this), I'm -1 for accepting dynamically generated sitemaps. Hmm, really? And what if I don't use the cocoon protocol but the http and address Cocoon externally? The sitemap is created dynamically

Re: Manually specifying a mounted sub sitemap's context

2005-04-09 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le 9 avr. 05, à 19:21, Sylvain Wallez a écrit : ...Cocoon is sometimes too much powerful and people use too much cocoon: dynamic URLs when other systems would require to dump something on disk, and this can lead to overly complex and and very unefficient architectures. So, although we may

Re: Manually specifying a mounted sub sitemap's context

2005-04-09 Thread Jochen Kuhnle
Hi Sylvain, I agree that generated sitemaps are a somewhat more sophisticated use of Cocoon. However, I think it is a nice feature to have. My main reason for this is that I want to hide the nuts and bolts of sitemaps from site maintainers and just want to give them a limited subset (or

Re: [VOTE] Alfred Nathaniel as committer

2005-04-09 Thread Ralph Goers
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Please cast your votes: here's my +1 +1 Ralph

Re: Manually specifying a mounted sub sitemap's context

2005-04-09 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Le 9 avr. 05, à 19:21, Sylvain Wallez a écrit : ...Cocoon is sometimes too much powerful and people use too much cocoon: dynamic URLs when other systems would require to dump something on disk, and this can lead to overly complex and and very unefficient