Berin Loritsch wrote:
It seems that a huge hole in documentation exists on the site. As I was
training one of my crew on how to write a reader (adapting a servlet we
had) I found I couldn't refer to one nice page. Not even the JavaDocs
really help all that much. I didn't even know about
Michael Wechner wrote:
Hi
I have two questions re the JCR Block
1) How can one actually access the content of properties?
You could look at the Lenya JCR meta data handling for an example.
(JCRMetaData class)
-- Andreas
Dear root,
Please create an account for a new cocoon committer:
Full name:Jorg Heymans
Preferred userid: jheymans
Forwarding email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested karma: cocoon, lenya, xml-commons, xml-site
Vote: [22] positive and no
The basic Cocoon
concepts in the sitemap certainly by itself have no clear concept of a
GUI control with a MVC split. So calling Cocoon MVC+ is also not
appropriate IMO.
IYO ...maybe let's leave it like that
cheers
--
Torsten
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Cocoon GetTogether 2005
October 5,6,7th, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
http://www.cocoongt.org.
DEADLINE for proposal : Friday September 2th, 2005
Proposals should be sent to: info at cocoongt.org
In 7 weeks
Hi,
Hope i'm not wrong, but i seems to me that the
FlowJXPathSelectionListBuilder
(/src/blocks/forms/java/org/apache/cocoon/forms/datatype/FlowJXPathSelectionListBuilder.java)
is missing something to add the html tag selected for the item
selected in a selection-list.
Then we could do:
Hello,
I'm designing web application for different medias, and thus
why I'm looking for any XUL to HTML
transforming template (probably XSL(T)). Do you know any?
Does Cocoon support it?
Thus could be reasonable solution for browser which cannot render
XUL pages.
TIA,
Maciej Gawinecki
Maciej Gawinecki wrote:
Hello,
I'm designing web application for different medias, and thus
why I'm looking for any XUL to HTML
transforming template (probably XSL(T)). Do you know any?
Does Cocoon support it?
Thus could be reasonable solution for browser which cannot render
XUL pages.
I
Guys,
In the last few days I've seen 3 requests for documentation updates and
missing docs on the Cocoon website, so my intention is to get the
current website updated and the missing docs added. BUT I'm going to do
this in Daisy and trying to weed out the deprecated files.
I have to start
Hello,
FIPA Specification, when talking about protocols and communication
act, states the Initiator (Agent A1) send REQUEST to Responder (Agent A2)
and them Responder sends back e.g. AGREE+INFORM or just INFORM.
So we have: A1-A2-A1.
Imagine the situation, where A2 passes request to another
hepabolu schrieb:
Guys,
In the last few days I've seen 3 requests for documentation updates and
missing docs on the Cocoon website, so my intention is to get the
current website updated and the missing docs added. BUT I'm going to do
this in Daisy and trying to weed out the deprecated
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
hepabolu schrieb:
Guys,
In the last few days I've seen 3 requests for documentation updates and
missing docs on the Cocoon website, so my intention is to get the
current website updated and the missing docs added. BUT I'm going to do
this in Daisy and trying to
On Monday 15 August 2005 20:57, Maciej Gawinecki wrote:
FIPA Specification
Google reports;
* Foreign Investment Promotion Agency - Sell Thy Country
* Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents - For King and Country
* Festival International de Programmes Audiovisuels - See your Country
*
Sorry, mea culpa ;)
- Original Message -
From: Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: One initiator, two responders
On Monday 15 August 2005 20:57, Maciej Gawinecki wrote:
FIPA Specification
Google reports;
*
hepabolu wrote:
I noticed, so I copied the info over.
Great, thanks!!
No, I don't think there is an easy
update procedure into Daisy.
Hmm, and I thought writing docs gets easier... :)
Besides, I've taken the liberty of
rearranging some info (i.e. shorten long docs into several shorter
Steven Noels wrote:
On 13 Aug 2005, at 23:15, Berin Loritsch wrote:
It's not that hard to write the Cocoon components, but there should
be something that puts it down. I can't guarantee I can do it soon
but I'll see what I can do. Where should I put it in the grand
scheme of things?
If
Hi Antonio
I am sorry about the difficulty you have had getting this to work. It's
unfortunate you started with version 2.1.X. I prepared the patch on
version 2.2, checked everything worked, then adapted the patch file for
2.1.X structure by hand.
Clearly I got this wrong, so I'm now in the
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
No, I don't think there is an easy
update procedure into Daisy.
Hmm, and I thought writing docs gets easier... :)
Well, I find WYSIWYG editing in Daisy a lot easier than writing XML
documents with trial and error when it comes to basic layout (i.e.
headers,
Guys,
I don't know if a vote for this is required, but I'd like to have
consensus/feedback, before I do something drastic.
As written earlier today there are gaps in the current version of the
website, e.g. FAQs are missing. What I'd like to do is restore the
current content of the website
hepabolu wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
No, I don't think there is an easy
update procedure into Daisy.
Hmm, and I thought writing docs gets easier... :)
Well, I find WYSIWYG editing in Daisy a lot easier than writing XML
documents with trial and error when it comes to basic layout (i.e.
hepabolu wrote:
Guys,
I don't know if a vote for this is required, but I'd like to have
consensus/feedback, before I do something drastic.
As written earlier today there are gaps in the current version of the
website, e.g. FAQs are missing. What I'd like to do is restore the
current
I can't add anything or create a new area for documentation. That means
all I can do is view. Kind of hard to contribute like that.
hepabolu wrote:
Guys,
I don't know if a vote for this is required, but I'd like to have
consensus/feedback, before I do something drastic.
As written earlier today there are gaps in the current version of the
website, e.g. FAQs are missing. What I'd like to do is restore the
current
Berin Loritsch wrote:
I can't add anything or create a new area for documentation. That means
all I can do is view. Kind of hard to contribute like that.
As you are down as an (emeritus) cocoon commmitter, I've just given you
rights.
Look forward to seeing the results of your work!
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35538.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35538.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35538.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35538.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33004.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Upayavira wrote:
Berin Loritsch wrote:
I can't add anything or create a new area for documentation. That
means all I can do is view. Kind of hard to contribute like that.
As you are down as an (emeritus) cocoon commmitter, I've just given
you rights.
Look forward to seeing the results
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35537.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35537.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
hepabolu wrote:
Guys,
I don't know if a vote for this is required, but I'd like to have
consensus/feedback, before I do something drastic.
As written earlier today there are gaps in the current version of the
website, e.g. FAQs are missing. What I'd like to do is restore the
current
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Ugo Cei wrote:
This patch seems to have broken some of the JX templates I was
using. In particular, I had templates where the jx namespace prefix
was declared in a single jx:forEach element (most of the content is
static and I just need to interate a collection to
-common-0.4-20050815.jar.license.txt
(with props)
cocoon/trunk/lib/optional/cowarp-0.3.jar (with props)
cocoon/trunk/lib/optional/portals-bridges-common-0.4-20050815.jar (with
props)
Removed:
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/samples/sitemap.xmap
Modified:
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/WEB-INF
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Michael Wechner wrote:
Hi
I have two questions re the JCR Block
1) How can one actually access the content of properties?
You cannot access them directly with the JCRNodeSource, which is meant
to represent file-like abstractions which are mapped to nodes.
I see knopflerfish in the trunk, but to compile it I have to copy the
knopflerfish jars from core to /lib/osgi/knopflerfish.
Ihave built it using
build osgi
cocoon osgi or ./cocoon.sh osgi
as described in the README.osgi
When I try and run it I get an error in this line:
Error: Command
Is cocoon going to use knopflerfish or oscar for its default OSGI
container?
Cheers,
Thor HW
Thor Heinrichs-Wolpert wrote:
Is cocoon going to use knopflerfish or oscar for its default OSGI
container?
Probably Oscar, or whatever it becomes. However, it may take some time
for the Oscar 2.0 code to mature enough for us to be able to use it, and
Oscar may go through quite an unstable
39 matches
Mail list logo
