--- Joerg Heinicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On 17.08.2005 11:22, Andrew Stevens wrote:
Although as a mere user my vote probably doesn't
count,
It's a so-called non-binding vote, but your opinion
is important though.
from my
perspective I'm extremely grateful that Cocoon
still
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
The idea for blocks is that blocks that contain public URLs are
mounted at deploy time at a some root URL, then the URL revriting
transformer translates internal use of
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36240.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36240.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36240.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36240.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36240.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Thursday 18 August 2005 05:08, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
Is there more to it??
That an OSGi framework need to have a protocol like the bundle protocol
as part of its implementation to be able to implement Bundle.getResource
as motivated in my example above.
On Thursday 18 August 2005 19:19, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
AFAICT, the specification (R3) does not require the returned URL to be
globally resolvable,
If you mean globally resolvable within the current OSGi instance I
interpret 4.23.3.11 in the spec as that the returned URL should be
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Thursday 18 August 2005 19:19, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
AFAICT, the specification (R3) does not require the returned URL to be
globally resolvable,
If you mean globally resolvable within the current OSGi instance I
interpret 4.23.3.11 in the spec as that the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36162.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Thursday 18 August 2005 19:19, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
AFAICT, the specification (R3) does not require the returned URL to be
globally resolvable,
If you mean globally resolvable within the current OSGi instance I
interpret 4.23.3.11 in the spec as that the
Hi all,
Uploads in Cocoon are handled at the servlet level, including a check of
the maximum upload size which raises an exception. This exception is a
major pain because it gives no chance to the application to warn the
user that she exceeded the allowed limit. All we get is an ugly servlet
Guys,
this looks like a bug, either in the documentation or in the code. Can
someone tell me what it's the correct way (i.e. which one is wrong)?
Thanks.
Bye, Helma
Original Message
Subject: requestURI -- documentation bug?
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 11:57:13 +0200
From:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36251.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'll de-lurk for a minute to say - sounds good to me. Better than
what we have now.
If you're looking to consider alternatives as well, IIRC there was
some discussion of implementing a delayed wrapper around the multipart
parsing to allow finer-grained control of when, how, and if the parts
were
Hi all,
I just committed the Cocoon stacktraces stuff to trunk.
There's some more work to be done to throw located exceptions everywhere
and reduce exception nesting, but the basic infrastructure is there and
is really an improvement compared to what we had a few weeks ago :-)
Enjoy!
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Hi all,
I just committed the Cocoon stacktraces stuff to trunk.
There's some more work to be done to throw located exceptions
everywhere and reduce exception nesting, but the basic infrastructure
is there and is really an improvement compared to what we had a few
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Hi all,
Uploads in Cocoon are handled at the servlet level, including a check
of the maximum upload size which raises an exception. This exception
is a major pain because it gives no chance to the application to warn
the user that she exceeded
hepabolu wrote:
Guys,
this looks like a bug, either in the documentation or in the code. Can
someone tell me what it's the correct way (i.e. which one is wrong)?
Neither. Both code and documentation are correct - but may be documentation can
be made easier to understand.
Current doc,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20682.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24433.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25294.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25110.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26755.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27600.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28844.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29008.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34754.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34754.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 20:13 +0200, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Hi all,
I just committed the Cocoon stacktraces stuff to trunk.
Cheers.
Especially for forrest ;-)
--
thorsten
Together we stand, divided we fall!
Hey you (Pink Floyd)
31 matches
Mail list logo