Ant: Re: CoWarp (was Re: svn commit: r232855...)

2005-08-18 Thread Reinhard Poetz
--- Joerg Heinicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On 17.08.2005 11:22, Andrew Stevens wrote: Although as a mere user my vote probably doesn't count, It's a so-called non-binding vote, but your opinion is important though. from my perspective I'm extremely grateful that Cocoon still

Re: Standardizing resources in jars (was Re: [Proposal] Switch to Maven NOW)

2005-08-18 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: The idea for blocks is that blocks that contain public URLs are mounted at deploy time at a some root URL, then the URL revriting transformer translates internal use of

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36240] New: - [PATCH] [Portal] Use OJB and the HSQLDB for authentication

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36240. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36240] - [PATCH] [Portal] Use OJB and the HSQLDB for authentication

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36240. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36240] - [PATCH] [Portal] Use OJB and the HSQLDB for authentication

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36240. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36240] - [PATCH] [Portal] Use OJB and the HSQLDB for authentication

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36240. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36240] - [PATCH] [Portal] Use OJB and the HSQLDB for authentication

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36240. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Standardizing resources in jars (was Re: [Proposal] Switch to Maven NOW)

2005-08-18 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Thursday 18 August 2005 05:08, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Is there more to it?? That an OSGi framework need to have a protocol like the bundle protocol as part of its implementation to be able to implement Bundle.getResource as motivated in my example above.

Re: Standardizing resources in jars (was Re: [Proposal] Switch to Maven NOW)

2005-08-18 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Thursday 18 August 2005 19:19, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: AFAICT, the specification (R3) does not require the returned URL to be globally resolvable, If you mean globally resolvable within the current OSGi instance I interpret 4.23.3.11 in the spec as that the returned URL should be

Re: Standardizing resources in jars (was Re: [Proposal] Switch to Maven NOW)

2005-08-18 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Thursday 18 August 2005 19:19, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: AFAICT, the specification (R3) does not require the returned URL to be globally resolvable, If you mean globally resolvable within the current OSGi instance I interpret 4.23.3.11 in the spec as that the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36162] - Memory Leak with XMLFileModule

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36162. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Standardizing resources in jars (was Re: [Proposal] Switch to Maven NOW)

2005-08-18 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Thursday 18 August 2005 19:19, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: AFAICT, the specification (R3) does not require the returned URL to be globally resolvable, If you mean globally resolvable within the current OSGi instance I interpret 4.23.3.11 in the spec as that the

Handling oversized uploads with the application

2005-08-18 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Hi all, Uploads in Cocoon are handled at the servlet level, including a check of the maximum upload size which raises an exception. This exception is a major pain because it gives no chance to the application to warn the user that she exceeded the allowed limit. All we get is an ugly servlet

[Docs] Fwd: requestURI -- documentation bug? - request for info

2005-08-18 Thread hepabolu
Guys, this looks like a bug, either in the documentation or in the code. Can someone tell me what it's the correct way (i.e. which one is wrong)? Thanks. Bye, Helma Original Message Subject: requestURI -- documentation bug? Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 11:57:13 +0200 From:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36251] New: - Compiling Cocoon 2.1.7 not possible with JDK 1.4.1_01

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36251. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Handling oversized uploads with the application

2005-08-18 Thread Geoff Howard
I'll de-lurk for a minute to say - sounds good to me. Better than what we have now. If you're looking to consider alternatives as well, IIRC there was some discussion of implementing a delayed wrapper around the multipart parsing to allow finer-grained control of when, how, and if the parts were

Cocoon stacktraces in trunk.

2005-08-18 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Hi all, I just committed the Cocoon stacktraces stuff to trunk. There's some more work to be done to throw located exceptions everywhere and reduce exception nesting, but the basic infrastructure is there and is really an improvement compared to what we had a few weeks ago :-) Enjoy!

Re: Cocoon stacktraces in trunk.

2005-08-18 Thread Berin Loritsch
Sylvain Wallez wrote: Hi all, I just committed the Cocoon stacktraces stuff to trunk. There's some more work to be done to throw located exceptions everywhere and reduce exception nesting, but the basic infrastructure is there and is really an improvement compared to what we had a few

Re: Handling oversized uploads with the application

2005-08-18 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: Hi all, Uploads in Cocoon are handled at the servlet level, including a check of the maximum upload size which raises an exception. This exception is a major pain because it gives no chance to the application to warn the user that she exceeded

Re: [Docs] Fwd: requestURI -- documentation bug? - request for info

2005-08-18 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
hepabolu wrote: Guys, this looks like a bug, either in the documentation or in the code. Can someone tell me what it's the correct way (i.e. which one is wrong)? Neither. Both code and documentation are correct - but may be documentation can be made easier to understand. Current doc,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20682] - Generator directory: Caching fails

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20682. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24433] - JXTemplate generator does not handle format-number(number, '$#,##0.00')

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24433. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25294] - Refactoring current styles for making extension simpler

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25294. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25110] - [Roadmap] CocoonForms - release 1.0

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25110. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26755] - XInclude processing failed for sample due to wrong xpointer expression

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26755. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27600] - syntax for unique rows in repeater binding

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27600. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28844] - NPE in Sendmail Action

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28844. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29008] - petstore broken

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29008. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34754] - Cron sample doesn't work

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34754. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34754] - Cron sample doesn't work

2005-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34754. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Cocoon stacktraces in trunk.

2005-08-18 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 20:13 +0200, Sylvain Wallez wrote: Hi all, I just committed the Cocoon stacktraces stuff to trunk. Cheers. Especially for forrest ;-) -- thorsten Together we stand, divided we fall! Hey you (Pink Floyd)