Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
Deployement
---
During development it is easiest to deploy block by using an
(possibly graphical) OSGi console. Is this ok for production systems,
should we have some web gui?
A graphical installer is fine for development but IMHO
Please cast your votes!
+1
Cheers, Alfred.
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential,
proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege
is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error,
please
After updating to latest and doing a clean build I get the following NPE
on startup - I guess this is something from the new validation block.
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Null configuration
at
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
After updating to latest and doing a clean build I get the following NPE
on startup - I guess this is something from the new validation block.
I think I remember reading that Pier said that his latest commit didn't
necessarily work (next task was testing and samples).
On 12 Sep 2005, at 10:14, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
After updating to latest and doing a clean build I get the
following NPE
on startup - I guess this is something from the new validation block.
Yep... It simply compiled cleanly but I didn't test it (read my
commit message).
After
Cocoon GetTogether 2005
Friday, October 7th in Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Hackathon on October 5th 6th
http://www.cocoongt.org
09:00-09:15 Welcome
09:15-09:30 Opening talk from the PMC chair: State
I've noticed that when one works on Cocoon in Eclipse, and at a
certain point issues a ./build.sh clean-dist, Eclipse complains
that its build directory is gone nowhere, and that somehow it can't
re-create it.
I assume this is because the output directory for Eclipse is
somewhere on a
Pier Fumagalli schrieb:
I've noticed that when one works on Cocoon in Eclipse, and at a
certain point issues a ./build.sh clean-dist, Eclipse complains
that its build directory is gone nowhere, and that somehow it can't
re-create it.
I assume this is because the output directory for
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Ah i see now where my extra comments in msg18202 came from:
I refererred to an additional file called copyright.txt
which must have had extra restrictions. Don't know if
that is still the same today.
The copyright.txt just states that it's (C)
Le 8 sept. 05, à 12:42, Pier Fumagalli a écrit :
On 8 Sep 2005, at 10:39, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
---Good idea - having had a look at it, maybe ResponseWrapper should
let some headers go through?
The cache-related ones (Expires, Cache-Control, Last-Modified) make
sense to me.
I would be
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36612.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Pier Fumagalli schrieb:
I've noticed that when one works on Cocoon in Eclipse, and at a
certain point issues a ./build.sh clean-dist, Eclipse complains
that its build directory is gone nowhere, and that somehow it can't
re-create it.
I assume this is because the
On 12 Sep 2005, at 14:07, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Pier Fumagalli schrieb:
I've noticed that when one works on Cocoon in Eclipse, and at a
certain point issues a ./build.sh clean-dist, Eclipse
complains that its build directory is gone nowhere, and that
somehow it
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
I agree with Vadim... Most of the times when I check out projects
internally here, the bin directory is where all my scripts live
(kinda like ./bin/jetty.sh, blablabla - it's Unix standard).
I personally started using .eclipse because it's normally hidden
from
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
I see your point - in the meantime I've worked around the problem by
storing cache-related info in a Request attribute and generating the
headers later in a non-internal part of pipeline.
I also found out that (in the 2.1.7 release at least), pipelines called
Le 12 sept. 05, à 15:31, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit :
...What does this currently mean? If I set headers in a sub sitemap
they
are ignored?..
That's what I'm seeing, my mounted sitemap has an Action which sets
HTTP headers, and a Serializer which sets Content-Length, and they are
all eaten by
On 12 Sep 2005, at 14:47, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 12 sept. 05, à 15:31, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit :
...What does this currently mean? If I set headers in a sub
sitemap they
are ignored?..
That's what I'm seeing, my mounted sitemap has an Action which sets
HTTP headers, and a
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 12 Sep 2005, at 14:47, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 12 sept. 05, à 15:31, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit :
...What does this currently mean? If I set headers in a sub
sitemap they
are ignored?..
That's what I'm seeing, my mounted sitemap has an Action which sets
HTTP
Le 12 sept. 05, à 15:57, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit :
...Yepp - so the question is: which changes broke this?
Most probably related to
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=109785174903101w=2
And we should solve this for 2.1.8.
Yes - I don't have much time now as I have to
Hi all,
I found an annoying thing today. The following straightforward sitemap
statement, which is intended to download a zip file, leads IE to display
an error message when the users tries to open Winzip from IE (saving the
file on disk is ok):
map:read src=foo.zip
Do you mean something like mod_rewrite for Apache
(http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_rewrite.html)?
Andreas
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Ok, the more I think about it, I could imagine using a url pre and post
precessor. When a url (link) is
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
Deployement
---
During development it is easiest to deploy block by using an
(possibly graphical) OSGi console. Is this ok for production systems,
should we have some web gui?
A graphical installer is fine
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 13 Sep 2005, at 00:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There might be some bugs (as always with my code), but as I need to use
those in production, if one comes along, I'll be likely to be the first
one to spot it... As far as I can see, for now, everything works.
Can
23 matches
Mail list logo