Re: Real blocks - current state and next steps

2005-09-12 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Reinhard Poetz wrote: Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Deployement --- During development it is easiest to deploy block by using an (possibly graphical) OSGi console. Is this ok for production systems, should we have some web gui? A graphical installer is fine for development but IMHO

RE: [vote] Arje Cahn as a new Cocoon committer

2005-09-12 Thread Nathaniel Alfred
Please cast your votes! +1 Cheers, Alfred. This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please

NPE in 2.1.x on startup

2005-09-12 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
After updating to latest and doing a clean build I get the following NPE on startup - I guess this is something from the new validation block. java.lang.IllegalStateException: Null configuration at

Re: NPE in 2.1.x on startup

2005-09-12 Thread Upayavira
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: After updating to latest and doing a clean build I get the following NPE on startup - I guess this is something from the new validation block. I think I remember reading that Pier said that his latest commit didn't necessarily work (next task was testing and samples).

Re: NPE in 2.1.x on startup

2005-09-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 12 Sep 2005, at 10:14, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: After updating to latest and doing a clean build I get the following NPE on startup - I guess this is something from the new validation block. Yep... It simply compiled cleanly but I didn't test it (read my commit message). After

[GT2005] Program online: it's time to register!

2005-09-12 Thread Arje Cahn
Cocoon GetTogether 2005 Friday, October 7th in Amsterdam, The Netherlands Hackathon on October 5th 6th http://www.cocoongt.org 09:00-09:15 Welcome 09:15-09:30 Opening talk from the PMC chair: State

Small nag for Eclipse

2005-09-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
I've noticed that when one works on Cocoon in Eclipse, and at a certain point issues a ./build.sh clean-dist, Eclipse complains that its build directory is gone nowhere, and that somehow it can't re-create it. I assume this is because the output directory for Eclipse is somewhere on a

Re: Small nag for Eclipse

2005-09-12 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Pier Fumagalli schrieb: I've noticed that when one works on Cocoon in Eclipse, and at a certain point issues a ./build.sh clean-dist, Eclipse complains that its build directory is gone nowhere, and that somehow it can't re-create it. I assume this is because the output directory for

Re: svn commit: r279762 - in /cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X: legal/msv-20030225.jar.license.txt lib/optional/msv-20030225.jar src/blocks/validation/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/validation/Validator.java

2005-09-12 Thread David Crossley
Pier Fumagalli wrote: David Crossley wrote: Ah i see now where my extra comments in msg18202 came from: I refererred to an additional file called copyright.txt which must have had extra restrictions. Don't know if that is still the same today. The copyright.txt just states that it's (C)

Re: ResponseWrapper eats my HTTP header settings, as does map:mount ;-(

2005-09-12 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le 8 sept. 05, à 12:42, Pier Fumagalli a écrit : On 8 Sep 2005, at 10:39, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: ---Good idea - having had a look at it, maybe ResponseWrapper should let some headers go through? The cache-related ones (Expires, Cache-Control, Last-Modified) make sense to me. I would be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36612] New: - [Link] OSN

2005-09-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36612. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Small nag for Eclipse

2005-09-12 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Pier Fumagalli schrieb: I've noticed that when one works on Cocoon in Eclipse, and at a certain point issues a ./build.sh clean-dist, Eclipse complains that its build directory is gone nowhere, and that somehow it can't re-create it. I assume this is because the

Re: Small nag for Eclipse

2005-09-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 12 Sep 2005, at 14:07, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Pier Fumagalli schrieb: I've noticed that when one works on Cocoon in Eclipse, and at a certain point issues a ./build.sh clean-dist, Eclipse complains that its build directory is gone nowhere, and that somehow it

Re: Small nag for Eclipse

2005-09-12 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Pier Fumagalli wrote: I agree with Vadim... Most of the times when I check out projects internally here, the bin directory is where all my scripts live (kinda like ./bin/jetty.sh, blablabla - it's Unix standard). I personally started using .eclipse because it's normally hidden from

Re: ResponseWrapper eats my HTTP header settings, as does map:mount ;-(

2005-09-12 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: I see your point - in the meantime I've worked around the problem by storing cache-related info in a Request attribute and generating the headers later in a non-internal part of pipeline. I also found out that (in the 2.1.7 release at least), pipelines called

Re: ResponseWrapper eats my HTTP header settings, as does map:mount ;-(

2005-09-12 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le 12 sept. 05, à 15:31, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit : ...What does this currently mean? If I set headers in a sub sitemap they are ignored?.. That's what I'm seeing, my mounted sitemap has an Action which sets HTTP headers, and a Serializer which sets Content-Length, and they are all eaten by

Re: ResponseWrapper eats my HTTP header settings, as does map:mount ;-(

2005-09-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 12 Sep 2005, at 14:47, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Le 12 sept. 05, à 15:31, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit : ...What does this currently mean? If I set headers in a sub sitemap they are ignored?.. That's what I'm seeing, my mounted sitemap has an Action which sets HTTP headers, and a

Re: ResponseWrapper eats my HTTP header settings, as does map:mount ;-(

2005-09-12 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 12 Sep 2005, at 14:47, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Le 12 sept. 05, à 15:31, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit : ...What does this currently mean? If I set headers in a sub sitemap they are ignored?.. That's what I'm seeing, my mounted sitemap has an Action which sets HTTP

Re: ResponseWrapper eats my HTTP header settings, as does map:mount ;-(

2005-09-12 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le 12 sept. 05, à 15:57, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit : ...Yepp - so the question is: which changes broke this? Most probably related to http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=109785174903101w=2 And we should solve this for 2.1.8. Yes - I don't have much time now as I have to

Vary: Host in ResourceReader breaks IE

2005-09-12 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Hi all, I found an annoying thing today. The following straightforward sitemap statement, which is intended to download a zip file, leads IE to display an error message when the users tries to open Winzip from IE (saving the file on disk is ok): map:read src=foo.zip

Re: [Proposal] Creating better portal urls

2005-09-12 Thread Andreas Hochsteger
Do you mean something like mod_rewrite for Apache (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_rewrite.html)? Andreas Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Ralph Goers wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Ok, the more I think about it, I could imagine using a url pre and post precessor. When a url (link) is

Re: Real blocks - current state and next steps

2005-09-12 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Deployement --- During development it is easiest to deploy block by using an (possibly graphical) OSGi console. Is this ok for production systems, should we have some web gui? A graphical installer is fine

Re: Validation block finished (Was: Re: svn commit: r280450 - in /cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/blocks/validation: conf/ java/org/apache/cocoon/components/validation/ java/org/apache/cocoon/components/validation/impl/ java/org/apache/cocoon/transformation/ samples/)

2005-09-12 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 13 Sep 2005, at 00:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There might be some bugs (as always with my code), but as I need to use those in production, if one comes along, I'll be likely to be the first one to spot it... As far as I can see, for now, everything works. Can