Re: Add form widgets

2005-12-21 Thread Ralph Goers
Sylvain Wallez wrote: Ralph Goers wrote: I have been asked to look into how custom form widgets can be added. With the block structure in 2.2 this would imply that the widgets would need to be added to our own block. How can we append to the widget definitions in cocoon-forms.xconf

Re: Add form widgets

2005-12-21 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Ralph Goers wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: Ralph Goers wrote: I have been asked to look into how custom form widgets can be added. With the block structure in 2.2 this would imply that the widgets would need to be added to our own block. How can we append to the widget definitions in

[jira] Created: (COCOON-1720) Form.js overwrites the CFormsInstance attribute

2005-12-21 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot (JIRA)
Form.js overwrites the CFormsInstance attribute --- Key: COCOON-1720 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1720 Project: Cocoon Type: Bug Components: Blocks: Forms Versions: 2.1.9-dev (current SVN)

RE: rejuvenating the webdav block

2005-12-21 Thread Max Pfingsthorn
Hi! Can you show me a block (or some sort of description of how it should look like) so I can rearrange the structure accordingly? I read the mavenization threads, but it seems all a bit fuzzy right now. Does anyone know how a proper block should definitely look like? max -Original

Performance Issue / FS Checks

2005-12-21 Thread Georg Hüttenegger
Hi, after a little bit of analyzing I found out that cocoon does a lot of file system checks for the last modification time (of java script files) even if reload scripts is turned off. I have made two small changes in org\apache\cocoon\components\flow CompilingInterpreter.java and

Re: Performance Issue / FS Checks

2005-12-21 Thread Ralph Goers
We don't normally apply patches submitted via the mailing list. Could you please create a Jira issue and attach the patches there? Thanks, Ralph Georg Hüttenegger wrote: Hi, after a little bit of analyzing I found out that cocoon does a lot of file system checks for the last modification

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project cocoon (in module cocoon) failed

2005-12-21 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project cocoon has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 57

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project cocoon (in module cocoon) failed

2005-12-21 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project cocoon has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 57

Re: JMX integration

2005-12-21 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Giacomo Pati wrote: I now do have a working implementation for JMX with the least impact (by added dependencies) to the core (so far only the javax.management interfaces). The discovery approach is simply looking whether there is a class which has the MBean suffix to the FQCN of the

Re: JMX integration

2005-12-21 Thread Upayavira
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Giacomo Pati wrote: I now do have a working implementation for JMX with the least impact (by added dependencies) to the core (so far only the javax.management interfaces). The discovery approach is simply looking whether there is a class which has the MBean suffix to