Online report :
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org:12000/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/9/buildId/316
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Error
Started at: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 07:04:13 +
Finished at: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 07:04:13 +
Total
+1. Does this avoid the problem of the Rhino license though (with 2.1)?
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Our last official release has happened a long time ago...
I think it's time to release something again :) Imho we should release
2.2-M2 asap and 2.1.10 as well. I think 2.1.10-dev is currently
Online report :
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org:12000/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/9/buildId/317
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Error
Started at: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 08:03:52 +
Finished at: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 08:03:52 +
Total
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Build Error:
Provider message: The svn command failed.
Command output:
Lars Trieloff has made POMs for XML Graphics Commons and FOP during the
GetTogether and has sent them to me. They are still unprocessed in my
inbox because so far I haven't had time (or a particular motivation (not
being a Maven user)) to prepare the Maven artifacts. What I'm certainly
going to do
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1939?page=comments#action_12445359
]
Daniel Fagerstrom commented on COCOON-1939:
---
The BlockContext wasn't pushed at the BlockCallStack when doing a polymorphic
call through the block
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1939?page=comments#action_12445360
]
Daniel Fagerstrom commented on COCOON-1939:
---
Forgot to mention that I commited the fix.
Stack overflow when inheriting from block that alread
I've done some modifications to the XML Graphics Commons build to create
Maven artifacts. I'd be grateful if someone could run the build (target:
maven-artifacts) to see if everything looks like it should. The
modifications are done for Trunk and the 1.1 branch (soon to be released).
Lars Trieloff skrev:
Hi Daniel,
I've just noted that uploads with CForms are not working with the Blocks
Framework. The reason is a bug in
org.apache.cocoon.environment.http.HttpRequest.get() that checks for a
wrapped MultipartHttpServletRequest.
Checking for a class doesn't seem to be a
Joerg Heinicke skrev:
On 28.10.2006 12:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468669
Log:
Improve error reporting by using a CascadingIOException instead of an
ordinary IOException. Due to Alexander Klimetschek.
Modified:
On 28.10.2006 12:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468669
Log:
Improve error reporting by using a CascadingIOException instead of an ordinary
IOException. Due to Alexander Klimetschek.
Modified:
+1 to release 2.2-M2
+1 to release 2.1.10
+1 to drop block sharing
-1 to put 2.1.x into *pure* bug fixing mode
We should try to attract people to 2.2 rather than pushing them
away from 2.1 (because they may go somewhere else).
I expect to be stuck with 2.1.x for the next 1-2 years. That's a
Alexander Klimetschek skrev:
Hi,
I am trying to improve the exception handling for the new blocks. The
problem is that you don't see the exceptions thrown inside a called
blockservlet. Apart from changing the BlockConnection to throw a
CascadingIOException,
Fixed that. I didn't spent much
On 28.10.2006 12:37, Nathaniel Alfred wrote:
-1 to put 2.1.x into *pure* bug fixing mode
Selling to management another
migration project before 2008 would be very hard, especially since
the current 2.2 has new feature really interesting to us.
Something is wrong with that sentence I guess.
On 27.10.2006 20:57, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
The release of 2.1.10 should be the last planned release for 2.1.x - we
should drop the block sharing between trunk and the branch of the blocks
right after the release and continue development of things only in trunk
from that point on.
+1
So my
Thanks Carsten for the roadmap:
+0 to release 2.2-M2 (as I probably won't find time to help)
+1 to release 2.1.10
+1 to drop block sharing
And, like Alfred, I'm
-1 on making 2.1.10 the last 2.1.x release
I think maintenance mode is much more appropriate for 2.1.x than no
more updates, I don't
From: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Selling to management another
migration project before 2008 would be very hard, especially since
the current 2.2 has new feature really interesting to us.
Something is wrong with that sentence I guess. I miss the logic: You
can't sell
Online report :
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org:12000/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/9/buildId/321
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Error
Started at: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:34:11 +
Finished at: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:34:11 +
Total
Daniel Fagerstrom schrieb:
Fixed that. I didn't spent much time thinking about exception handling
in the blocks fw, so patches would be welcome.
Thanks. I did not send a patch since I was waiting for feedback on the
other exception problem with the ResourceReader (below) to have a more
Online report :
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org:12000/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/9/buildId/324
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Error
Started at: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:03:01 +
Finished at: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:03:01 +
Total
Online report :
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org:12000/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/9/buildId/325
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Error
Started at: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 00:16:07 +
Finished at: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 00:16:08 +
Total
21 matches
Mail list logo
