Okay, I'm slowly getting my head around all this. Just one thing
left, I think. In order to actually build the stuff, I'm going to
need a "build root", i.e. an instance of project "cocoon-project". I
figured how which directories in tags/ correspond to things in the
directory tree of t
On 31 Jul 2008, at 12:46, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Jeremy Quinn wrote:
Any suggestions about a clean way to have both Java and ICU
NumberFormat ?
If the ICU number formats are compatible with the current ones, I
think replacing the current implementation with ICU is the best way.
I don't
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 07:21 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> >
> >> Just to say another name: ;)
> >>
> >> Apache Kokon
> >>
> >> which is cocoon in German.
> >>
> >
> > jeje this one is for Antonio:
> >
> > Apache Capullo
> >
> > which is cocoon in Spanish (but in S
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Just to say another name: ;)
Apache Kokon
which is cocoon in German.
jeje this one is for Antonio:
Apache Capullo
which is cocoon in Spanish (but in Spain it has a slightly double
meaning).
salu2
Should I ask?
I actually like both those names - depe
Sorry, I didn't do reply-all. I usually just do reply on all my Apache
email.
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
What would be the options that we vote on?
a) keep the name Apache Cocoon Corona
b) rename to Apache Cocoon Silk
c) we need to find some other name
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 14:03 +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 09:54 +0200, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Reinhard Pötz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> > >> just put up all the suggested names for a
> > >> majo
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 09:54 +0200, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Reinhard Pötz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> >> just put up all the suggested names for a
> >> majority vote of our committers, and be done with it.
> >
> > What would b
Jeremy Quinn wrote:
Any suggestions about a clean way to have both Java and ICU NumberFormat ?
If the ICU number formats are compatible with the current ones, I think
replacing the current implementation with ICU is the best way. I don't
think that we have to be compatible on a class level he
Hi Joerg
Yes, there are separate icu4jDateConvertor and FormattingDateConvertor
(which uses the original java.text.DateFormat).
The problem I see, replicating the same separation with Numbers, is
having to make almost duplicates of the many
Formatting[Number]Convertors, feels like a mess
Ralph Goers wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
What would be the options that we vote on?
a) keep the name Apache Cocoon Corona
b) rename to Apache Cocoon Silk
c) we need to find some other name
Any other options?
I sent a message to legal internal to get their opinion on options a and
b. I su
Torsten Curdt apache.org> writes:
> I think Corona is a great name. Everyone uses it. People already know
> it by now. Let's officially call it Apache Cocoon (Project) Corona.
> Everyone will call it Corona anyway. Will that really be a problem?
> (Sorry if I missed that thread/post)
>
> A
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Ralph Goers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Reinhard Pötz wrote:
>>
>> What would be the options that we vote on?
>>
>> a) keep the name Apache Cocoon Corona
>> b) rename to Apache Cocoon Silk
>> c) we need to find some other name
>>
>> Any other options?
>
> I
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
What would be the options that we vote on?
a) keep the name Apache Cocoon Corona
b) rename to Apache Cocoon Silk
c) we need to find some other name
Any other options?
I sent a message to legal internal to get their opinion on options a and
b. I suggest waiting for an
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Reinhard Pötz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>> just put up all the suggested names for a
>> majority vote of our committers, and be done with it.
>
> What would be the options that we vote on?
>
> a) keep the name Apache Cocoon Corona
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...We had this renaming game with CForms IIRC. And it was more confusing than
it helped.
yes, it took years until Woody was gone. But the situation was different
because Woody had a large use
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...We had this renaming game with CForms IIRC. And it was more confusing than
> it helped. I guess that was so long ago that some people don't remember...
I do remember - finding names for products today is the nightmare ;
Ralph Goers wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Borland hasn't trademarked "silk" but only some variants of it. See
http://tinyurl.com/5bkw9d
"Silk" was trademarked by a company called mentis:
http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=pgshps.20.117
The name that we would use is "Cocoon Sil
Guy, just my 2 cents.
We had this renaming game with CForms IIRC. And it was more confusing
than it helped. I guess that was so long ago that some people don't
remember.
I think Corona is a great name. Everyone uses it. People already know
it by now. Let's officially call it Apache Cocoon
18 matches
Mail list logo
