RE: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread Laurent Medioni
Hi Cédric, We have a lot of alive and kicking deployments of our applications in many sites across the World. A lot of older 2.1.5 but we managed to migrate our most recent versions to 2.1.11 (and BTW removing most of the patches we had to apply to 2.1.5, painful but worth it). 2.1.11 proves to

Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Cédric, 2010/3/22 Cédric Damioli cedric.dami...@anyware-services.com: ...I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain the Cocoon-2.1 branch ? If not, I volunteer to do the job, as this branch is important for us, and I don't want to have to fork it in our own

Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread David Crossley
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Cédric Damioli wrote: ...I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain the Cocoon-2.1 branch ? If not, I volunteer to do the job, as this branch is important for us, and I don't want to have to fork it in our own repository I'm +1

Re: ForrestBot build for cocoon-docs FAILED

2010-03-23 Thread David Crossley
Automated build for cocoon-docs FAILED ... [java] * [214/145] [0/298] 2.256s 54.0Kb 2.1/userdocs/pdf-serializer.html [java] X [0] 2.1/856.htmlBROKEN: Stream closed. These failures with the Cocoon-2.1 docs seem to be sporadic. It seems

Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread Sylvain Wallez
David Crossley wrote: Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Cédric Damioli wrote: ...I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain the Cocoon-2.1 branch ? If not, I volunteer to do the job, as this branch is important for us, and I don't want to have to fork it in our own

Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 20:22 +0100, Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi Cocoon community, ... So I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain the Cocoon-2.1 branch ? Apache Forrest and Apache Lenya are still based on cocoon 2.1.x. Both communities devs are normally subscribed to

Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread Alec Bickerton
Cédric Damioli wrote: Hi Cocoon community, Here at Anyware, we have dozens of Cocoon-2.1 based applications in production. We've hacked Cocoon a lot, so that migrating to most recent releases of Cocoon is not an option for us at the moment Cocoon 2.1 is a *very* stable framework, especially

Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread Alfred Nathaniel
BTW, is there still many Cocoon-2.1 users around here ? Best regards, Cédric Damioli At my daytime job I am also still running a number of high-profile websites with Cocoon 2.1.10. So I am very much interested in continuing the 2.1.x branch. But could we agree that JDK1.5 should be