Possibly worth discussing if it’s easier to port to Git and do that then … or
if better done in SVN … I guess the final discussion Git vs. SVN still needs to
formally be done, right?
Chris
Von: Cédric Damioli
Datum: Dienstag, 23. Januar 2024 um 17:30
An: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW:
+1
Cédric
Le 23/01/2024 à 17:25, Christofer Dutz a écrit :
Yeah … I also think that possibly making them read-only (and
additionally prefixing them with a “retired/” prefix should be enough.
Chris
*Von: *Cédric Damioli
*Datum: *Freitag, 12. Januar 2024 um 20:48
*An: *dev@cocoon.apache.org
Yeah … I also think that possibly making them read-only (and additionally
prefixing them with a “retired/” prefix should be enough.
Chris
Von: Cédric Damioli
Datum: Freitag, 12. Januar 2024 um 20:48
An: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x
Why shoul
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cocoon/pull/58
Bumps
[org.springframework:spring-core](https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework)
from 4.3.30.RELEASE to 6.0.15.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/spring-projects/s
