I’d be happy to take care of that. Chris
Von: Gabriel Gruber <gabriel.gru...@workflow.at> Datum: Sonntag, 28. Januar 2024 um 16:50 An: dev@cocoon.apache.org <dev@cocoon.apache.org> Betreff: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x Going to github would make things a lot easier. Who could do that? Gabriel Gesendet von Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> ________________________________ From: Jörg Heinicke <joerg.heini...@gmx.de> Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2024 4:37:25 PM To: dev@cocoon.apache.org <dev@cocoon.apache.org> Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x I'd also rather go with porting to Git as next step. Besides, this seems a necessary prerequisite to revive the community since it reduces the hurdle to get people involved. Jörg On 23.01.24 17:54, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Possibly worth discussing if it’s easier to port to Git and do that then > … or if better done in SVN … I guess the final discussion Git vs. SVN > still needs to formally be done, right? > > Chris > > *Von: *Cédric Damioli <cdami...@apache.org> > *Datum: *Dienstag, 23. Januar 2024 um 17:30 > *An: *dev@cocoon.apache.org <dev@cocoon.apache.org> > *Betreff: *Re: AW: AW: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x > > +1 > > Cédric > > Le 23/01/2024 à 17:25, Christofer Dutz a écrit : > > Yeah … I also think that possibly making them read-only (and > additionally prefixing them with a “retired/” prefix should be enough. > > Chris
