[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1606?page=comments#action_12413901
]
Thomas Lutz commented on COCOON-1606:
-
Hi Antonio,
I retested in cocoon zones (latest 2.1 code, trunk was not working) and had a
look at the sources (trunk: see [1
Though I am not a dev guy, I can't resist to vote, too. IMHO a mix makes
no sense. Too make a long story short I made struggled my way into
cocoon with
-first writing custom actions as I was not aware that I should use flow
instead
-then switching to flow using JavaScript
-and finally port
Irv Salisbury wrote:
snip /
1. CForms - Our recent app has about 175 CForms. Each of the binding,
definition, and template files were cocoon: URLs. For doing simple
forms, having to write 3 files was a real pain and very time
consuming. So, we started building our own meta file that
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
snip /
My impression is that with all these changes, Cocoon will be sexy
again. Add a bit of runtime analysis of databases and automatic
generation of CForms to the picture, and you have something that has
the same productivity as RoR, but in a J2EE environment. It also
I'll be there, too, just registered.
Did not know that we have a cocoon comitter here in vienna :-)... good
to know.
Reinhard Poetz schrieb:
As member of the working group open source of the Austrian Computer
Society I'm organizing an event on web frameworks. There will be
Thomas Lutz wrote:
Ok, so lets sum up what we've got so far:
-its not sure that we get valid data from the binding
-so we need validation _and_ enabling/disabling of the action buttons
-enabling and disabling could be done in the ActionRepeater* classes
So the last problem is the right place
Mark Lundquist wrote:
On Oct 4, 2005, at 8:51 AM, JD Daniels wrote:
I figured out how to use it, I am off making my own POJO's to plug
into the basic cocoon install I have settled on. I have a suspicion
that the drop in traffic is attributable to this - users simply
evolve. The questions I
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Luca Morandini wrote:
Consider: 1) Declining cocoon-users activity.
This worries me as well, especially the last couple of months it has
become very obvious [1].
Why? you might ask:
Is the framework stable? Have most issues been solved/answered already?
Does
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
snip /
Hmm... There are different issues here:
Validation:
We can extend the fd:range or fd:value-count validators so that
they can validate a repeater. But the issue then is that a repeater
has no way to automatically display its error, and therefore it's up
the
Ok, so lets sum up what we've got so far:
-its not sure that we get valid data from the binding
-so we need validation _and_ enabling/disabling of the action buttons
-enabling and disabling could be done in the ActionRepeater* classes
So the last problem is the right place for the validation
done - Bug 36731
regards,
tom
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Thomas Lutz wrote:
snip/
Shall I supply a patch ? Which other classes should I have a look at ?
Please do and file it in Bugzilla together with your testcase.
Thanks,
Jorg
Hi list !
Starting with
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@cocoon.apache.org/msg29109.html from
the users list I found a bug (at least I think it is one) in the
FormattingDecimalConvertor.java.
Setup (code snippets below):
-a form with a field widget that has a datatype decimal (and some
Hi list !
I have two small contributions/patches for the cforms, which maybe could
be included in the next release... Sorry for posting this to the dev
list, but I am not sure wether the patches are useful/correct, and
looking at bugzilla I get the feeling that patches are rather not
Seriously, what about right after the GT, once we have squashed a
few bugs and patches during the hackathon?
What about the patches in bugzilla ? Will they be applied before 2.1.8 ?
Is there a code freeze announced, because I've some work in progress on
the FormInstance class in the
forgot to copy the link, sorry :-)
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@cocoon.apache.org/msg33424.html
Thomas Lutz wrote:
Seriously, what about right after the GT, once we have squashed a
few bugs and patches during the hackathon?
What about the patches in bugzilla
Hi list !
Not sure wether this is a bug, so I want to ask before posting to bugzilla
I have a form with a submit widget that has its attribute validate set
to false.
Submitting this form results in:
-no validation, as expected
-NOT leaving the do while(!finished) loop in FormInstance.java -
Hi list !
Short summary: I am not sure wether this line in Form.java is correct:
private Locale locale = Locale.getDefault();
This is taken from the member variable declarations...
It takes the default locale from the host, but shouldn't it take the
locale set via the browser or the
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Thomas Lutz wrote:
private Locale locale = Locale.getDefault();
It takes the default locale from the host, but shouldn't it take the
locale set via the browser or the LocaleAction.java ? So the line
should rather be something like:
private Locale locale
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Thomas Lutz wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Thomas Lutz wrote:
private Locale locale = Locale.getDefault();
It takes the default locale from the host, but shouldn't it take
the locale set via the browser or the LocaleAction.java ? So the
line should rather
Hi list !
What is the status of the new documenation site using daisy ?
Is there a public URL yet ?
One of the most frequently asked questions in the users list is ..how
do I access request parameters in the sitemap... and I'd like to wikify
or FAQ it, but as I read before on this list, all
20 matches
Mail list logo
