Hi,
On 8 Dec 2003, at 03:00, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Why Apple fans always try to forgot the fact: Intel or AMD craps are
faster in the same space and time than Gx processors? And try to hide
this
fact it behind the OS arena? I know, in hardware, it is not an MHz.
issue.
But Intel and AMD
On 7 Dec 2003, at 19:00, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
I still have present the Stefano projection in 8 or more hours for
converting to DIVx a 45 mins long conferences of GT2003. This is not
the
case on my Intel crap. I did a similar work with a 90 minuts video
with an
old AMD crap and it was a
Stefano Mazzocchi dijo:
On 7 Dec 2003, at 19:00, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
I still have present the Stefano projection in 8 or more hours for
converting to DIVx a 45 mins long conferences of GT2003. This is not
the
case on my Intel crap. I did a similar work with a 90 minuts video
with an
Hi All,
Sorry for the off topic posting, but I've been thinking about
upgrading my laptop and you guys have been saying how good
the modern Macs are :)
I was wondering if you'd tell me which Mac you have and
whether you'd buy one again :)
Thanks,
J.
PS, I've never owned a Mac before.
PPS, if
Hi John,
On 7 Dec 2003, at 11:12, John Morrison wrote:
I was wondering if you'd tell me which Mac you have and
whether you'd buy one again :)
New 15 Powerbook G4. Bought two of them. I would recommend them to
anybody, and I would definitely buy them again.
Pros: it just works. It's light.
On 7 Dec 2003, at 11:12, John Morrison wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry for the off topic posting, but I've been thinking about
upgrading my laptop and you guys have been saying how good
the modern Macs are :)
I was wondering if you'd tell me which Mac you have and
whether you'd buy one again :)
Ohh... And
John Morrison wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry for the off topic posting, but I've been thinking about
upgrading my laptop and you guys have been saying how good
the modern Macs are :)
I was wondering if you'd tell me which Mac you have and
whether you'd buy one again :)
Thanks,
J.
PS, I've never owned a
* John Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-07 11:12]:
Hi All,
Sorry for the off topic posting, but I've been thinking about
upgrading my laptop and you guys have been saying how good
the modern Macs are :)
I was wondering if you'd tell me which Mac you have and
whether you'd buy one
I would've gotten one of these a few months ago, but decided on a winxp
instead because i wasn't sure about its standard office compatibility.
I mean can you easily link up to an exchange server? See windows file
servers, mount windows directories, open/edit/save m$-office word and
excel files
As a contractor my main bread butter client is the BC Government in
Canada.
To save money, the BC Gov't has standardized on M$ Windows for the
desktop. They've never actually looked to see if they have saved any
money from this decision, but I can tell you about the thousands of
work days
On 7 Dec 2003, at 18:07, Jorg Heymans wrote:
I would've gotten one of these a few months ago, but decided on a
winxp instead because i wasn't sure about its standard office
compatibility. I mean can you easily link up to an exchange server?
See windows file servers, mount windows directories,
On 7 Dec 2003, at 06:29, Robert Koberg wrote:
John Morrison wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry for the off topic posting, but I've been thinking about
upgrading my laptop and you guys have been saying how good
the modern Macs are :)
I was wondering if you'd tell me which Mac you have and
whether you'd buy one
On 7 Dec 2003, at 09:48, Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu wrote:
When you buy a Mac you are literally buying time.
This is *S* true
--
Stefano.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 7 Dec 2003, at 06:29, Robert Koberg wrote:
John Morrison wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry for the off topic posting, but I've been thinking about
upgrading my laptop and you guys have been saying how good
the modern Macs are :)
I was wondering if you'd tell me which Mac you have
Hi:
Why a Mac when you can get a more powerful machine with an Intel or AMD
processor with the same money?
If you concerns are about speed, stability and realibility then use Linux.
I currently use Fedora Core 1 with great results. Also you can have the
same machine with dual boot just in case
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Why a Mac when you can get a more powerful machine with an Intel or AMD
processor with the same money?
It's not the same money actually. Have a Mac with you for a few days,
and then start wondering about the time you're saving since thing just
work. I did the math: given
On 7-Dec-03, at 4:08 PM, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
BTW, Mac OS X is a Linux based distribution for the Mac processors
with a
price included. They use KDE as the desktop environment.
Sorry, I haven't responded to some other incorrect stuff, but
OSX is GNU Mach from NeXT with a FreeBSD
Ok, end this thread now or I'll start flaming people! :-)
On 8 Dec 2003, at 00:08, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
BTW, Mac OS X is a Linux based distribution for the Mac processors
with a
price included. They use KDE as the desktop environment.
Dude, you don't know what you're talking about! :-) :-)
On 8 Dec 2003, at 00:30, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
BTW, Mac OS X is a Linux based distribution for the Mac processors
with a
price included. They use KDE as the desktop environment.
Uh? Come on Antonio, this is just blatantly untrue to say the least:
OS X roots are in BSD, not Linux, and KDE has
Gianugo Rabellino dijo:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Why a Mac when you can get a more powerful machine with an Intel or AMD
processor with the same money?
It's not the same money actually. Have a Mac with you for a few days,
and then start wondering about the time you're saving since thing just
You're both wrong, guys... Mac OS/X is not based on Linux, nor on BSD. It's based on a derivate of CMU's original Mach kernel, which was a direct response to a architectural problem of the BSD kernel...
Getting closer ... Mach was the name chosen because MOOS sounded wrong and one of the other
On 7-Dec-03, at 7:00 PM, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
snip/snip
I'm glad you like your Linux based laptop, the fellow asked if we liked
our OSX boxes ... which we do.
But for the record I never stop my OSX laptop, so I don't have to
restart, (okay for your 1 minute). Then I don't have to restart my
Antonio Gallardo dijo:
Why Apple fans always try to forgot the fact: Intel or AMD craps are
faster in the same space and time than Gx processors? And try to hide this
fact it behind the OS arena? I know, in hardware, it is not an MHz. issue.
But Intel and AMD craps are in fact faster and
On 7-Dec-03, at 8:37 PM, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Antonio Gallardo dijo:
Why Apple fans always try to forgot the fact: Intel or AMD craps are
faster in the same space and time than Gx processors? And try to hide
this
fact it behind the OS arena? I know, in hardware, it is not an MHz.
issue.
But
24 matches
Mail list logo
