Re: [RT] Shielded classloading

2006-11-12 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: So I propose that we move WEB-INF/classes to WEB-INF/shielded-classes and WEB-INF/libs to WEB-INF/shielded-libs. Looks OK to me. Wouldn't WEB-INF/shielded/classes and WEB-INF/shielded/libs be slightly better? Anyway, +1. Yepp - I just

Re: [RT] Shielded classloading

2006-11-10 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: So I propose that we move WEB-INF/classes to WEB-INF/shielded-classes and WEB-INF/libs to WEB-INF/shielded-libs. Looks OK to me. Wouldn't WEB-INF/shielded/classes and WEB-INF/shielded/libs be slightly better? Anyway, +1. Vadim

[RT] Shielded classloading

2006-11-03 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Trunk has now this nice feature called shielded classloading (which is an improved version of the paranoid classloader). Currently our own plugin moves classes and libs to WEB-INF/cocoon/. As we got bored by discussing which logging framework to use, I think it's more fun to discuss directory

Re: [RT] Shielded classloading

2006-11-03 Thread Giacomo Pati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Trunk has now this nice feature called shielded classloading (which is an improved version of the paranoid classloader). Currently our own plugin moves classes and libs to WEB-INF/cocoon/. As we got bored by discussing