Re: [RT] Simplify flow usage

2006-10-12 Thread Alexander Klimetschek
Created a jira issue including a patch that only takes files directly under flow/ into account. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1933 Alex Alexander Klimetschek schrieb: I just run into a problem with the automatic loading of all files inside flow/: if there is a subversion

Re: [RT] Simplify flow usage

2006-10-03 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
I now implemented this convention stuff - all files located in the flow directory relative to the current sitemap are added to the flow interpreter - regardless of the file name suffix and the used interpreter (javascript, javaflow etc). The directory is of course optional. By this we show a best

Re: [RT] Simplify flow usage

2006-10-01 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 29.09.2006 09:19, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Now what about the other directories we currently have: config/spring, config/xconf and config/properties? Should we leave them where they are or move them one directory up? I'd prefer the flat variant, i.e. without config subdir. Jörg

Re: [RT] Simplify flow usage

2006-09-29 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Reinhard Poetz wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Is anyone against make using flow a little bit easier in trunk? I really hate to specify all my flow scripts in the sitemap - so what about using some convention over configuration stuff and include by default all *.js files which are located in

Re: [RT] Simplify flow usage

2006-09-29 Thread hepabolu
Carsten Ziegeler said the following on 29/9/06 09:19: If noone objects I will add the stuff in the next days. I like the feature but not the location as flowscripts are not configuration files. What about ./flow only? Ok, it seems that everyone here is in favour of using just flow without an

Re: [RT] Simplify flow usage

2006-09-29 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
hepabolu wrote: How much extra effort would it take to allow overriding the location in e.g. the sitemap? E.g. as an attribute in map:flow map:flow location=my/own/path/to/flow/ That shouldn't be difficult - but then the question is if this is overriding the default location or an

Re: [RT] Simplify flow usage

2006-09-29 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: hepabolu wrote: How much extra effort would it take to allow overriding the location in e.g. the sitemap? E.g. as an attribute in map:flow map:flow location=my/own/path/to/flow/ That shouldn't be difficult - but then the question is if this is overriding the default

Re: [RT] Simplify flow usage

2006-09-29 Thread hepabolu
Reinhard Poetz said the following on 29/9/06 11:14: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: hepabolu wrote: How much extra effort would it take to allow overriding the location in e.g. the sitemap? E.g. as an attribute in map:flow map:flow location=my/own/path/to/flow/ That shouldn't be difficult - but

Re: [RT] Simplify flow usage

2006-09-29 Thread Andrew Savory
hepabolu wrote: Agree, but since it's more part of the application like Bertrand pointed out, I favor a way to override the default location. So: - default = all *.js in ./flow - some specification somewhere = all *.js in my/own/path/to/flow - different locations = use map:flow/ (which is

[RT] Simplify flow usage

2006-09-28 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Is anyone against make using flow a little bit easier in trunk? I really hate to specify all my flow scripts in the sitemap - so what about using some convention over configuration stuff and include by default all *.js files which are located in the config/flow directory (relative to the current

Re: [RT] Simplify flow usage

2006-09-28 Thread Leszek Gawron
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Is anyone against make using flow a little bit easier in trunk? I really hate to specify all my flow scripts in the sitemap - so what about using some convention over configuration stuff and include by default all *.js files which are located in the config/flow directory

Re: [RT] Simplify flow usage

2006-09-28 Thread Peter Hunsberger
On 9/28/06, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone against make using flow a little bit easier in trunk? I really hate to specify all my flow scripts in the sitemap - so what about using some convention over configuration stuff and include by default all *.js files which are located

Re: [RT] Simplify flow usage

2006-09-28 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Is anyone against make using flow a little bit easier in trunk? I really hate to specify all my flow scripts in the sitemap - so what about using some convention over configuration stuff and include by default all *.js files which are located in the config/flow directory