Re: [RT] the value of being wrong

2003-07-17 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: I have taken a step back and reconsidered the whole discussion about flow and how to implement it. Stefano, I will not answer in detail to this RT (computer time is scarce during holidays), but let me say that I'm happy to see your "balkanization paranoia" going do

Re: [RT] the value of being wrong

2003-07-16 Thread J.Pietschmann
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Or, if you want to rephrase, ... the communitytator? J.Pietschmann

Re: [RT] the value of being wrong

2003-07-16 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On Wednesday, Jul 16, 2003, at 01:21 America/Guayaquil, Andreas Hochsteger wrote: Often I thought that he's a bit arrogant (forgive me, Stefano ;-) Arrogant? who, me? You are *definately* and *utterly* wrong. I'm not arrogant: I'm a stinking pain in your ass. Or, if you want to rephrase, a bas

Re: [RT] the value of being wrong

2003-07-16 Thread Andreas Hochsteger
Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Andreas wrote; > > Nature and evolution has proven that many times. > > Even now we are often surprised that the behaviours and structures of > > all creatures on this earth serve a certain purpose which has been > > developed over the time. > > It was

Re: [RT] the value of being wrong

2003-07-16 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Andreas wrote; > Nature and evolution has proven that many times. > Even now we are often surprised that the behaviours and structures of > all creatures on this earth serve a certain purpose which has been > developed over the time. > It was not carefully planed as a perfect world from the beginni

Re: [RT] the value of being wrong

2003-07-16 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Andreas Hochsteger wrote, On 16/07/2003 8.21: ... Nature and evolution has proven that many times. Even now we are often surprised that the behaviours and structures of all creatures on this earth serve a certain purpose which has been developed over the time. It was not carefully planed as a p

Re: [RT] the value of being wrong

2003-07-16 Thread Andreas Hochsteger
"Antonio Gallardo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't know, if I can follow this interesting discussion further, since > > I'm going to marry my girlfriend on saturday (perhaps you already > > noticed). I'll be back on 29th of June. > Hi: > > Hey?! Almost a year in the honeymoon that sounds

Re: [RT] the value of being wrong

2003-07-16 Thread Marc Portier
Yo brother, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Finally, you are probably noting that I'm basically stating exactly what Andreas Hochsteger suggested as a compromise. actually, I rate this higher then a 'compromise' :-) But there is more: being wrong is something that you might know, but fail to express

Re: [RT] the value of being wrong

2003-07-15 Thread Antonio Gallardo
> I don't know, if I can follow this interesting discussion further, since > I'm going to marry my girlfriend on saturday (perhaps you already > noticed). I'll be back on 29th of June. Hi: Hey?! Almost a year in the honeymoon that sounds great for you! lol. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo.

Re: [RT] the value of being wrong

2003-07-15 Thread Andreas Hochsteger
Reinhard Pötz wrote: 6) You opened (at least) my eyes that technical elegance is not always the best and that in OS there are more important things. And I think many of us will be more careful with second, third and fourth, ..., implementations which all do the same ... I must confess, that I th

RE: [RT] the value of being wrong

2003-07-15 Thread Antonio Gallardo
> 6) You opened (at least) my eyes that technical elegance is not > always the best and that in OS there are more important things. > > And I think many of us will be more careful with second, third > and fourth, ..., implementations which all do the same ... Yep! This is all about the cathedral a

RE: [RT] the value of being wrong

2003-07-15 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Reinhard Pötz dijo: > > From: Stefano Mazzocchi >> >> >> I have taken a step back and reconsidered the whole discussion about >> flow and how to implement it. I still believe that there is a lot of >> preconceptions against the use of a scripted flow with continuations, >> but diversity is a better

RE: [RT] the value of being wrong

2003-07-15 Thread Reinhard Pötz
From: Stefano Mazzocchi > > > I have taken a step back and reconsidered the whole discussion about > flow and how to implement it. I still believe that there is a lot of > preconceptions against the use of a scripted flow with continuations, > but diversity is a better value than any implemen

RE: [RT] the value of being wrong

2003-07-15 Thread Hunsberger, Peter
Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am reconsidering my -1 on the attempts to make the flow > hooks in the > sitemap more abstracted and I'm turning it into a +1. I will put some > technical comments on the original thread, but I wanted to show why I > changed my mind. Many th

[RT] the value of being wrong

2003-07-15 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
I have taken a step back and reconsidered the whole discussion about flow and how to implement it. I still believe that there is a lot of preconceptions against the use of a scripted flow with continuations, but diversity is a better value than any implementation (as Berin suggests). Sylvain i