Re: [VOTE] Keep Commons Validator (was Re: svn commit: rev 54668 - cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/lib)

2004-10-13 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Ugo Cei wrote: Il giorno 12/ott/04, alle 14:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: set correct commons-validator-1.1.3.jar path (did the guy who's on stage now mess up? ;-) You bet! But the error slipped by because I had to disable jars validation because of another library that had broken it just a

Re: [VOTE] Keep Commons Validator (was Re: svn commit: rev 54668 - cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/lib)

2004-10-13 Thread Ugo Cei
Il giorno 13/ott/04, alle 11:18, Sylvain Wallez ha scritto: So I go for option 1: rip what need and don't include this additional dependency. Done. Ugo -- Ugo Cei - http://beblogging.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

[VOTE] Keep Commons Validator (was Re: svn commit: rev 54668 - cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/lib)

2004-10-12 Thread Ugo Cei
Il giorno 12/ott/04, alle 14:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: set correct commons-validator-1.1.3.jar path (did the guy who's on stage now mess up? ;-) You bet! But the error slipped by because I had to disable jars validation because of another library that had broken it just a few minutes

Re: [VOTE] Keep Commons Validator (was Re: svn commit: rev 54668 - cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/lib)

2004-10-12 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Ugo Cei dijo: 2. [+1] Keep it on the assumption that we will use it for something else. Please cast your votes or at least tell me what you think. I guess this library can be used in the other CForms validators + create new ones Some time ago I wrote a mail about that:

Re: [VOTE] Keep Commons Validator (was Re: svn commit: rev 54668 - cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/lib)

2004-10-12 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Antonio Gallardo wrote: Ugo Cei dijo: 2. [+1] Keep it on the assumption that we will use it for something else. Please cast your votes or at least tell me what you think. I guess this library can be used in the other CForms validators + create new ones Some time ago I wrote a mail about that: