Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow

2004-01-26 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Christopher Oliver wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Another question: do we want to cleanup flow/woody a bit and remove deprecated files/classes, such as non-FOM flow and woody.js? +1 Better yet, let's start VOTE thread. Please cast your vote on following: 1) Remove

Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow

2004-01-24 Thread Jorg Heymans
now that is wierd ! i just posted the ? in my previous reply to see if it would do this to me as well, not then. Maybe it doesn't like the way your mailer is quoting. I'm using thunderbird FWIW. Maybe it treats your gmx domain differently, there are several levels of spam filtering involved...

Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow

2004-01-24 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 24.01.2004 18:40, Jorg Heymans wrote: now that is wierd ! i just posted the ? in my previous reply to see if it would do this to me as well, not then. Maybe it doesn't like the way your mailer is quoting. I'm using thunderbird FWIW. I use Mozilla, so that should not be the difference. Maybe

[VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow

2004-01-23 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Christopher Oliver wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Another question: do we want to cleanup flow/woody a bit and remove deprecated files/classes, such as non-FOM flow and woody.js? +1 Better yet, let's start VOTE thread. Please cast your vote on following: 1) Remove woody.js [ ] 2) Remove

Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow

2004-01-23 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Christopher Oliver wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Another question: do we want to cleanup flow/woody a bit and remove deprecated files/classes, such as non-FOM flow and woody.js? +1 Better yet, let's start VOTE thread. Please cast your vote on following: 1) Remove

Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow

2004-01-23 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Sylvain Wallez dijo: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Christopher Oliver wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Another question: do we want to cleanup flow/woody a bit and remove deprecated files/classes, such as non-FOM flow and woody.js? +1 Better yet, let's start VOTE thread. Please cast your vote

RE: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow

2004-01-23 Thread Reinhard Poetz
From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Christopher Oliver wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Another question: do we want to cleanup flow/woody a bit and remove deprecated files/classes, such as non-FOM flow and woody.js? +1 Better yet, let's start VOTE thread. Please

Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow

2004-01-23 Thread Jorg Heymans
? Vadim Gritsenko vadim at reverycodes.com writes: 1) Remove woody.js [ +1] 2) Remove JSCocoon, JSWebContinuation, JSLog, JavaScriptInterpreter, JavaScriptFlow, JSGlobal, system.js [ +1] 3) Move JSCocoon, JSWebContinuation, JSLog, JavaScriptInterpreter, JavaScriptFlow, JSGlobal,

Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow

2004-01-23 Thread Geoff Howard
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Christopher Oliver wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Another question: do we want to cleanup flow/woody a bit and remove deprecated files/classes, such as non-FOM flow and woody.js? +1 Better yet, let's start VOTE thread. Please cast your vote on following: 1) Remove

Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow

2004-01-23 Thread Ugo Cei
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Better yet, let's start VOTE thread. Please cast your vote on following: 1) Remove woody.js [+1] 2) Remove JSCocoon, JSWebContinuation, JSLog, JavaScriptInterpreter, JavaScriptFlow, JSGlobal, system.js [-0] 3) Move JSCocoon, JSWebContinuation, JSLog,

RE: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow

2004-01-23 Thread Unico Hommes
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Better yet, let's start VOTE thread. Please cast your vote on following: 1) Remove woody.js [ +1 ] 2) Remove JSCocoon, JSWebContinuation, JSLog, JavaScriptInterpreter, JavaScriptFlow, JSGlobal, system.js [ -0 ] 3) Move JSCocoon, JSWebContinuation,

Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow

2004-01-23 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On 23 Jan 2004, at 15:15, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Christopher Oliver wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Another question: do we want to cleanup flow/woody a bit and remove deprecated files/classes, such as non-FOM flow and woody.js? +1 Better yet, let's start VOTE thread. Please cast your vote on

Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow

2004-01-23 Thread Steven Noels
On Jan 23, 2004, at 5:27 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: 1) Remove woody.js [ +1 ] 2) Remove JSCocoon, JSWebContinuation, JSLog, JavaScriptInterpreter, JavaScriptFlow, JSGlobal, system.js [ +1 ] 3) Move JSCocoon, JSWebContinuation, JSLog, JavaScriptInterpreter, JavaScriptFlow, JSGlobal,

Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow

2004-01-23 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 23.01.2004 16:05, Jorg Heymans wrote: ? Don't ask me why, but I always get a message that I have much more quoted text than new one in my followup/reply and gmane.org prevents me from sending the mail. Joerg PS: Did I mention that I hate gmane.org because I have to add useless text, so

Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow

2004-01-23 Thread Tony Collen
Steven Noels wrote: On Jan 23, 2004, at 5:27 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: 1) Remove woody.js [ +1 ] 2) Remove JSCocoon, JSWebContinuation, JSLog, JavaScriptInterpreter, JavaScriptFlow, JSGlobal, system.js [ +1 ] 3) Move JSCocoon, JSWebContinuation, JSLog, JavaScriptInterpreter,