Le 21 oct. 05, à 06:09, David Crossley a écrit :
...It would have a lot easier to do this documentation
movement for the 2.2 release
Yes - I cannot help on this ATM, but it looks like a lot of energy
which might bring more results if targeted to 2.2.
-Bertrand
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 14:09 +1000, David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Is there a way to have non-numerical URL in daisy?
Yes, and no.
Daisy completely separates the front-end application (the daisy-wiki)
from the back-end repository.
In the
David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Is there a way to have non-numerical URL in daisy?
Yes, and no.
Daisy completely separates the front-end application (the daisy-wiki)
from the back-end repository.
In the repository it is only possible to have numerical
Ross Gardler wrote:
http://forrest.zones.apache.org/ft/build/cocoon-docs/broken-links.xml
This not only lists the target of the link, but also the source of the
link too. So make fixing these things much easier :-)
Had my first Diasy editing today, nice. I fixed a few
of the broken links.
Ross Gardler wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Is there a way to have non-numerical URL in daisy?
Yes, and no.
Daisy completely separates the front-end application (the daisy-wiki)
from the back-end repository.
In the repository it is only possible to have numerical document IDs.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
...
Another problem I noticed - all URLs are number.daisy.html - we can't
publish these to official website...
Which part(s) are you objecting to?
The number is because daisy uses numbers rather than names to identify
Ross Gardler wrote:
However, as Vadim said (in another mail in this thread) we have to be
careful not to break current links and search engine indexing. This can
be done by forcing the rewriting of links to mirror the existing
structure, but that assumes the existing structure is good. I
hepabolu wrote:
My proposal is: keep the current docs, aka legacydocs in Daisy, as much
backward compatible as possible. This will be all the Cocoon 2.1.X
documentation we have.
Once we start releasing Cocoon 2.2 the 2.1 docs will be frozen, i.e.
the current state of cocoon.apache.org is
hepabolu wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
However, as Vadim said (in another mail in this thread) we have to be
careful not to break current links and search engine indexing. This
can be done by forcing the rewriting of links to mirror the existing
structure, but that assumes the existing
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
hepabolu wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
However, as Vadim said (in another mail in this thread) we have to be
careful not to break current links and search engine indexing. This
can be done by forcing the rewriting of links to mirror the existing
structure, but that
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Is there a way to have non-numerical URL in daisy?
I've added the original filename to the navigation entry of a document
in the legacydocs navigation. This results in a name as URL, rather than
a number. Daisy still uses the number to retrieve the document from
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
hepabolu wrote:
My proposal is: keep the current docs, aka legacydocs in Daisy, as
much backward compatible as possible. This will be all the Cocoon
2.1.X documentation we have.
Once we start releasing Cocoon 2.2 the 2.1 docs will be frozen, i.e.
the current state of
hepabolu wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
...
See http://people.apache.org/~rgardler/cocoon-site/659.daisy.html
(don't worry, there is a robot.txt file on there so this should not be
indexed)
...
just had a brief look and this is what I noted:
- you should use the navigation.xml file that
Ross Gardler wrote:
See: http://people.apache.org/~rgardler/cocoon-site/653.daisy.html
Correct. It looks much slicker than the official site, although my
fingers itch to do something about the navigation (CSS wise).
There are broken links now we switched to the new navigation. See
hepabolu wrote:
I've turned PDF's off for now. Currently the Forrest plugin does not
support Daisy Books, but it should. In the meantime we can pull the
published book from Daisy. This is not a problem as long as we are not
trying to integrate content from different sources into the book
hepabolu wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
See: http://people.apache.org/~rgardler/cocoon-site/653.daisy.html
Correct. It looks much slicker than the official site, although my
fingers itch to do something about the navigation (CSS wise).
My SVN committership has now been enabled. As soon as I
hepabolu wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
See: http://people.apache.org/~rgardler/cocoon-site/653.daisy.html
Correct. It looks much slicker than the official site, although my
fingers itch to do something about the navigation (CSS wise).
Please do :-) Black border around current page is ...
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
hepabolu wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
See: http://people.apache.org/~rgardler/cocoon-site/653.daisy.html
Correct. It looks much slicker than the official site, although my
fingers itch to do something about the navigation (CSS wise).
Please do :-) Black border
Ross Gardler wrote:
The number is because daisy uses numbers rather than names to identify
every page. There are ways around this in either Forrest or Daisy but it
is quite a bit of work.
Well, as I wrote earlier: I've entered a nodeId for each page in the
navigation.xml. You could use that
Ross Gardler wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Another problem I noticed - all URLs are number.daisy.html - we can't
publish these to official website...
Which part(s) are you objecting to?
This URL
/424.daisy.html
Should be
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/tracks/first-steps-track.html
hepabolu wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
The number is because daisy uses numbers rather than names to identify
every page. There are ways around this in either Forrest or Daisy but
it is quite a bit of work.
Well, as I wrote earlier: I've entered a nodeId for each page in the
navigation.xml.
Ross Gardler wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
hepabolu wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
See: http://people.apache.org/~rgardler/cocoon-site/653.daisy.html
Correct. It looks much slicker than the official site, although my
fingers itch to do something about the navigation (CSS wise).
Please
I just uploaded (to my apache webspace) a test publish from the daisy
docs using Forrest. I'm afraid I have not had time to look at the site,
so please report any issues you spot.
There is currently no index.html, this will, of course be fixed. What is
the correct index page, the home page on
Ross Gardler wrote:
I just uploaded (to my apache webspace) a test publish from the daisy
docs using Forrest. I'm afraid I have not had time to look at the site,
so please report any issues you spot.
There is currently no index.html, this will, of course be fixed. What is
the correct index
24 matches
Mail list logo
