Re: C2.2 dojotoolkit

2008-02-08 Thread Jeremy Quinn
Hi Joerg On 6 Feb 2008, at 05:26, Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 04.02.2008 08:43, Dev at weitling wrote: if the migration to Dojo 1.0 tends to become a big piece of work what about migrating to Prototype/Scriptaculous (or similar)? The last Dojo update to 0.4.3 was not that long ago, was it? So

Re: C2.2 dojotoolkit

2008-02-06 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Andy Stevens wrote: On 05/02/2008, Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dev at weitling wrote: Prototype/Scriptaculous has a smaller scope than Dojo that brings loads of features. You don't have to use all of them though and can strip down Dojo with the "compressor" they provides that em

Re: C2.2 dojotoolkit

2008-02-06 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Dev at weitling wrote: Hi Sylvain, thanks for answering. Sylvain Wallez wrote: Prototype/Scriptaculous has a smaller scope than Dojo that brings loads of features. You don't have to use all of them though and can strip down Dojo with the "compressor" they provides that embeds and obfuscates

Re: C2.2 dojotoolkit

2008-02-06 Thread Andy Stevens
On 05/02/2008, Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dev at weitling wrote: > Prototype/Scriptaculous has a smaller scope than Dojo that brings loads > of features. You don't have to use all of them though and can strip down > Dojo with the "compressor" they provides that embeds and obfuscate

Re: C2.2 dojotoolkit

2008-02-05 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 04.02.2008 08:43, Dev at weitling wrote: if the migration to Dojo 1.0 tends to become a big piece of work what about migrating to Prototype/Scriptaculous (or similar)? The last Dojo update to 0.4.3 was not that long ago, was it? So it can't be too hard to update ... Of course I might be to

Re: C2.2 dojotoolkit

2008-02-05 Thread Dev at weitling
Hi Sylvain, thanks for answering. Sylvain Wallez wrote: Prototype/Scriptaculous has a smaller scope than Dojo that brings loads of features. You don't have to use all of them though and can strip down Dojo with the "compressor" they provides that embeds and obfuscates everything you need in o

Re: C2.2 dojotoolkit

2008-02-05 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Dev at weitling wrote: Hi Jeroen, if the migration to Dojo 1.0 tends to become a big piece of work what about migrating to Prototype/Scriptaculous (or similar)? I'm not the Javascript guru but it would be nice to have a feature list (including quality of documentation) for re-evaluating the c

Re: C2.2 dojotoolkit

2008-02-04 Thread Dev at weitling
migration. Regards, Jeroen -Original Message- From: Felix Knecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 10:00 AM To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: C2.2 dojotoolkit Hi all Trying to do some ajax stuff I did realize that we still use the dojotoolkit 0.4.3 which i

RE: C2.2 dojotoolkit

2008-02-04 Thread Jeroen Reijn
iting for a project that would give him some time to actually spend on this migration. Regards, Jeroen -Original Message- From: Felix Knecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 10:00 AM To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: C2.2 dojotoolkit -BEGIN PGP SIGNED ME

C2.2 dojotoolkit

2008-02-04 Thread Felix Knecht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all Trying to do some ajax stuff I did realize that we still use the dojotoolkit 0.4.3 which is a really quite old version. Are there any plans about migrating to a newer version - latest is 1.0.2 (http://dojotoolkit.org/downloads)? Regards