Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 23 Nov 2003, at 22:04, Bruno Dumon wrote:
OTOH, renderkits not only abstract the rendering but also the decoding
of request parameters, so that's a point where they are more flexibile
then Woody, where it is all hardcoded in the widgets (and assumes
HTML-like behaviour
On 23 Nov 2003, at 22:04, Bruno Dumon wrote:
OTOH, renderkits not only abstract the rendering but also the decoding
of request parameters, so that's a point where they are more flexibile
then Woody, where it is all hardcoded in the widgets (and assumes
HTML-like behaviour).
Do you see value in tha
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 01:18, Erik Bruchez wrote:
> >>I just laughed. It will be a very hard job for any JSF proponent to
> >>convince multi-channel-intensive users to follow that renderkits road.
> >>I don't envy them at all ;-)
> >
> >
> > They'll probably defend by saying you can write a re
From: Erik Bruchez
> >>I just laughed. It will be a very hard job for any JSF
> proponent to >>convince multi-channel-intensive users to
> follow that renderkits road. >>I don't envy them at all ;-)
> > > > They'll probably defend by saying you can write a
> renderkit that > produces X
On Nov 24, 2003, at 1:18 AM, Erik Bruchez wrote:
This being said, for those who judge techologies without reading the
specs (or who read them too fast), there is nothing in JavaServer
Faces that forces you to use JSP or that limits you to outputting a
character stream from a renderer.
Amen.
An im
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruno Dumon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2003 5:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: CocoonForms compared with JSF
>
>
> On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 14:24, Danny Bols wrote:
> > > From: Reinha
>>I just laughed. It will be a very hard job for any JSF proponent to
>>convince multi-channel-intensive users to follow that renderkits road.
>>I don't envy them at all ;-)
>
>
> They'll probably defend by saying you can write a renderkit that
> produces XML and put an XSL behind that. They won't
On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 17:47, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> On 22 Nov 2003, at 14:48, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> > Le Samedi, 22 nov 2003, à 13:42 Europe/Zurich, Reinhard Poetz a écrit :
> >
> >>
> >> Over the last days I had an offlist discussion with Sylvain and I
> >> don't
> >> want to keep b
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
A XUL example would be *sweet*. Another one would be PDF-forms but I
don't think FOP supports it. :-( (besides, how would we do this? xforms:
inside fo:?)
Nope, no PDF Forms from FOP.. :( PDF forms would be totally killer though.
Tony
Ah, note, Craig told me that JSF are not bond to HTML. You implement a
java class for each different channel of the "server face".
That is true - but the fact of the matter is that there is currently
only an HTML RenderKit for HTML 4.01 included [1].
Matthew
[1] http://www.silent-penguin.com/a
On 22 Nov 2003, at 14:48, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Samedi, 22 nov 2003, à 13:42 Europe/Zurich, Reinhard Poetz a écrit :
Over the last days I had an offlist discussion with Sylvain and I
don't
want to keep back a very nice summary of Sylvain comparing CocoonForms
with JSF. I set up a Wiki pa
On 22 Nov 2003, at 13:42, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Over the last days I had an offlist discussion with Sylvain and I don't
want to keep back a very nice summary of Sylvain comparing CocoonForms
with JSF. I set up a Wiki page:
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=CocoonFormsJSF
We would be very int
On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 14:24, Danny Bols wrote:
> > From: Reinhard Poetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: zaterdag 22 november 2003 13:42
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: CocoonForms compared with JSF
> >
> >
> >
> > Over the last days I ha
Le Samedi, 22 nov 2003, à 13:42 Europe/Zurich, Reinhard Poetz a écrit :
Over the last days I had an offlist discussion with Sylvain and I don't
want to keep back a very nice summary of Sylvain comparing CocoonForms
with JSF. I set up a Wiki page:
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=CocoonForms
> From: Reinhard Poetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: zaterdag 22 november 2003 13:42
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: CocoonForms compared with JSF
>
>
>
> Over the last days I had an offlist discussion with Sylvain and I don't
> want to keep back a very n
Over the last days I had an offlist discussion with Sylvain and I don't
want to keep back a very nice summary of Sylvain comparing CocoonForms
with JSF. I set up a Wiki page:
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=CocoonFormsJSF
We would be very interested in your opinions because this will beco
16 matches
Mail list logo
