How much longer for the issue spamming?

2005-10-25 Thread Berin Loritsch
In the period of about 12 hours there has been over 120 messages generated by JIRA. All to do with opening and closing issues, etc. While it is to be expected that the introduction of the new tool is going to require some rampup time, Its hard to see the real mail traffic. Is there any way to

Re: How much longer for the issue spamming?

2005-10-25 Thread hepabolu
Berin Loritsch wrote: In the period of about 12 hours there has been over 120 messages generated by JIRA. All to do with opening and closing issues, etc. While it is to be expected that the introduction of the new tool is going to require some rampup time, Its hard to see the real mail

Re: How much longer for the issue spamming?

2005-10-25 Thread Berin Loritsch
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 10:18 am, hepabolu wrote: Berin Loritsch wrote: In the period of about 12 hours there has been over 120 messages generated by JIRA. All to do with opening and closing issues, etc. While it is to be expected that the introduction of the new tool is going to

Re: How much longer for the issue spamming?

2005-10-25 Thread Ralph Goers
hepabolu wrote: Berin Loritsch wrote: In the period of about 12 hours there has been over 120 messages generated by JIRA. All to do with opening and closing issues, etc. While it is to be expected that the introduction of the new tool is going to require some rampup time, Its hard to see

Re: How much longer for the issue spamming?

2005-10-25 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 25 Oct 2005, at 15:23, Berin Loritsch wrote: On Tuesday 25 October 2005 10:18 am, hepabolu wrote: Berin Loritsch wrote: In the period of about 12 hours there has been over 120 messages generated by JIRA. All to do with opening and closing issues, etc. While it is to be expected that the

Re: How much longer for the issue spamming?

2005-10-25 Thread Ralph Goers
Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 25 Oct 2005, at 15:23, Berin Loritsch wrote: Thanks. Is it still possible to have digest emails sent to the dev list instead of one per alteration? I think that is the most sensible option to minimize the signal to noise ratio on the list. Once all this