Ralph Goers wrote:
I thought about this some more. How about if a) to enable this feature
you put a variable as the version, b) the variable is replaced by its
definition c) if it isn't defined then go to the relativePath and get
the version from there, c) if this fails throw an exception.
I
Ralph Goers wrote:
It uses the relative path so you will need the parent also.
Hmm, I'm not sure if this is a good idea :) as it permits building a
module standalone.
For Cocoon we have the dream (tm) to have separate buildable/deployable
modules one day.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
It uses the relative path so you will need the parent also.
Hmm, I'm not sure if this is a good idea :) as it permits building a
module standalone.
For Cocoon we have the dream (tm) to have separate
buildable/deployable modules one day.
Carsten
Ralph Goers wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
It uses the relative path so you will need the parent also.
Hmm, I'm not sure if this is a good idea :) as it permits building a
module standalone.
For Cocoon we have the dream (tm) to have separate
buildable/deployable modules
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
It uses the relative path so you will need the parent also.
Hmm, I'm not sure if this is a good idea :) as it permits building a
module standalone.
For Cocoon we have the dream (tm) to have separate
Ralph Goers wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
It uses the relative path so you will need the parent also.
Hmm, I'm not sure if this is a good idea :) as it permits building
a module standalone.
For Cocoon we have the dream (tm)
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze:
Author: reinhard
Date: Tue Aug 5 12:42:45 2008
New Revision: 682901
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682901view=rev
Log:
back in snapshot mode
Modified:
cocoon/trunk/tools/pom.xml
Modified: cocoon/trunk/tools/pom.xml
URL:
Reinhard Pötz pisze:
yes, I was too lazy to touch nearly every POM file in our repository
just to increase the version number of our parent POMs. I haven't done
this for the last release either and AFAICT, no problem occurred.
Hmmm, find, xargs and sed should do this work within one minute.
Reinhard Pötz schrieb:
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze:
Author: reinhard
Date: Tue Aug 5 12:42:45 2008
New Revision: 682901
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682901view=rev
Log:
back in snapshot mode
Modified:
cocoon/trunk/tools/pom.xml
Modified:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
yes, I was too lazy to touch nearly every POM file in our repository
just to increase the version number of our parent POMs. I haven't done
this for the last release either and AFAICT, no problem occurred.
Does anybody know if it can cause problems if the development
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
yes, I was too lazy to touch nearly every POM file in our repository
just to increase the version number of our parent POMs. I haven't done
this for the last release either and AFAICT, no problem occurred.
Does anybody know if it can cause
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
I was releasing cocoon-parent because I wanted to use the latest
versions of some plugins and some dependencies (e.g. Spring).
Ah yes, ok - Personally I would not change the references of all modules
to the latest snapshot of the parent pom after a release. The modules
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Reinhard Pötz pisze:
yes, I was too lazy to touch nearly every POM file in our repository
just to increase the version number of our parent POMs. I haven't done
this for the last release either and AFAICT, no problem occurred.
Hmmm, find, xargs and sed should do
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze:
Author: reinhard
Date: Tue Aug 5 12:42:45 2008
New Revision: 682901
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682901view=rev
Log:
back in snapshot mode
Modified:
cocoon/trunk/tools/pom.xml
Modified:
Ralph Goers wrote
I'm actually working on a fix to maven for this at the moment. It would
allow you to put versionMAVEN_PARENT_VERSION/version in the pom
instead of an actual version number. Don't get your hopes up though.
I've been working on this for the last few weeks in the precious little
It uses the relative path so you will need the parent also.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote
I'm actually working on a fix to maven for this at the moment. It
would allow you to put versionMAVEN_PARENT_VERSION/version in the
pom instead of an actual version number. Don't get your
16 matches
Mail list logo
