Planning 2.1.6

2004-09-02 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
The 2.1.x branch contains imho enough important bug fixes for a new release: 2.1.6. What do you think of a release by the end of september? The only thing currently missing is merging all the changes we did to the head into the branch. This page http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/MergingBranches

Re: Planning 2.1.6

2004-09-02 Thread Ralph Goers
At 9/2/2004 12:30 AM, you wrote: The 2.1.x branch contains imho enough important bug fixes for a new release: 2.1.6. What do you think of a release by the end of september? +1

Re: Planning 2.1.6

2004-09-02 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: The 2.1.x branch contains imho enough important bug fixes for a new release: 2.1.6. What do you think of a release by the end of september? The only thing currently missing is merging all the changes we did to the head into the branch. This page

Re: Planning 2.1.6

2004-09-02 Thread Ugo Cei
Il giorno 02/set/04, alle 11:25, Sylvain Wallez ha scritto: Me neither. Other opinions? Release early, release often. Tomorrow is FF, so let's dedicate it to backporting whatever is possible from trunk and do a release soon after that. Ugo -- Ugo Cei - http://beblogging.com/ smime.p7s

Re: Planning 2.1.6

2004-09-02 Thread Unico Hommes
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: The 2.1.x branch contains imho enough important bug fixes for a new release: 2.1.6. What do you think of a release by the end of september? +1 -- Unico

Re: Planning 2.1.6

2004-09-02 Thread Jorg Heymans
For the proposed 2.1.6, can there be a virtual patchathon to at least address/apply the pending proposed patches in Bugzilla? I second this proposal.

Re: Planning 2.1.6

2004-09-02 Thread Andrew Savory
Hi, On 2 Sep 2004, at 08:30, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: What do you think of a release by the end of september? +1, followed by another release after the GT, if there's significant new stuff / fixes to make available. Andrew. -- Andrew Savory, Managing Director, Luminas Limited Tel: +44 (0)870 741

Re: Planning 2.1.6

2004-09-02 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le 2 sept. 04, à 14:44, Andrew Savory a écrit : Hi, On 2 Sep 2004, at 08:30, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: What do you think of a release by the end of september? +1, followed by another release after the GT, if there's significant new stuff / fixes to make available. same here, but cannot help ATM,

Re: Planning 2.1.6

2004-09-02 Thread Ralph Goers
At 9/2/2004 02:49 AM, you wrote: Il giorno 02/set/04, alle 11:25, Sylvain Wallez ha scritto: Me neither. Other opinions? Release early, release often. Tomorrow is FF, so let's dedicate it to backporting whatever is possible from trunk and do a release soon after that. Ugo I agree. Ralph

RE: Planning 2.1.6

2004-09-02 Thread Hunsberger, Peter
Ugo Cei [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Il giorno 02/set/04, alle 11:25, Sylvain Wallez ha scritto: Me neither. Other opinions? Release early, release often. Tomorrow is FF, so let's dedicate it to backporting whatever is possible from trunk and do a release soon after that. I'd

Re: Planning 2.1.6

2004-09-02 Thread David Crossley
Jorg Heymans wrote: For the proposed 2.1.6, can there be a virtual patchathon to at least address/apply the pending proposed patches in Bugzilla? I second this proposal. http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/FirstFriday -- David Crossley

Re: Planning 2.1.6

2004-09-02 Thread lpb+cocoon
On Thu, 3 Sep 2004, David Crossley wrote: Jorg Heymans wrote: For the proposed 2.1.6, can there be a virtual patchathon to at least address/apply the pending proposed patches in Bugzilla? I second this proposal. http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/FirstFriday -- David Crossley Fair 'nuff. Live and