Re: FW: Questions to be answered for link request - V3 - to be put i nto docs for 2.1.6 please

2004-11-16 Thread Upayavira
. Regards, Upayavira Thanks. Bye, Helma -Original Message- From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 16 November, 2004 11:24 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Questions to be answered for link request - V3 Hi Helma, I currently have very limited

Re: FW: Questions to be answered for link request - V3 - to be put i nto docs for 2.1.6 please

2004-11-16 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Message- From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 16 November, 2004 11:24 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Questions to be answered for link request - V3 Hi Helma, I currently have very limited internet access and can't use SVN :( So I guess the best

RE: FW: Questions to be answered for link request - V3 - to be put i nto docs for 2.1.6 please

2004-11-16 Thread H . vanderLinden
Is the SVN up then? I haven't checked out site yet. Bye, Helma -Original Message- From: Antonio Gallardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 16 November 2004 18:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: Questions to be answered for link request - V3 - to be put i nto docs

Re: FW: Questions to be answered for link request - V3 - to be put i nto docs for 2.1.6 please

2004-11-16 Thread Upayavira
(is that a part of the release process?) Regards, Upayavira -Original Message- From: Antonio Gallardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 16 November 2004 18:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: Questions to be answered for link request - V3 - to be put i nto docs for 2.1.6 please

RE: FW: Questions to be answered for link request - V3 - to be put i nto docs for 2.1.6 please

2004-11-16 Thread H . vanderLinden
PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 16 November 2004 22:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: Questions to be answered for link request - V3 - to be put i nto docs for 2.1.6 please [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is the SVN up then? I haven't checked out site yet. Thanks for the patch - I've

Re: FW: Questions to be answered for link request - V3 - to be put i nto docs for 2.1.6 please

2004-11-16 Thread Upayavira
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hope you read the message that came with it: I was unable to create a sample entry in Bugzilla. And the URL of this entry should go into the patch. So, there is a non-functional link in the patch. And now in the doc. Well, this is why any good publication system

RE: Questions to be answered for link request - V2

2004-11-09 Thread H . vanderLinden
Sorry, missed your post entirely. [[info on intranet Cocoon applications]] for light cocoon usage and preview purposes they are cocoon's samples area. what if they are people that want to share a biger project with the public but they dont want to setup an open source project (web

RE: Questions to be answered for link request - V3

2004-11-02 Thread H . vanderLinden
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 22 October, 2004 13:06 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Questions to be answered for link request - V2 Good comments by Bertrand and David, so I'll integrate them in the original text to get a better idea

Re: Questions to be answered for link request - V2

2004-10-26 Thread gounis
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Le 22 oct. 04, 15:49, Hunsberger, Peter a crit : ...Would an Intranet applications section also make sense? As I see it, this list would be a list of organizations and applications with a brief description of the application. Perhaps

Re: Questions to be answered for link request

2004-10-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le 21 oct. 04, à 23:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : - Create an entry in Bugzilla following these instructions: [[which options to select?]] Same as for a patch - Enter a summary like this: [Link] NameOfYourSite How can we verify this site is actually built with Cocoon? Here I'd like to add

Re: Questions to be answered for link request

2004-10-22 Thread David Crossley
H.vanderLinden wrote: Guys, I tend to enter the result of this discussion in Bugzilla, or maybe someone takes over and puts it directly in the docs, we'll see. For now I just want to do an inventory of questions we'd like to be answered in a link request. Here's a proposal for the text, [[

RE: Questions to be answered for link request - V2

2004-10-22 Thread H . vanderLinden
Good comments by Bertrand and David, so I'll integrate them in the original text to get a better idea of the end result. --- How to get listed If you do not find your site here, make sure you tell us. Please follow the instructions below, or we will not be able to honor your

RE: Questions to be answered for link request - V2

2004-10-22 Thread Hunsberger, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Good comments by Bertrand and David, so I'll integrate them in the original text to get a better idea of the end result. --- How to get listed snipproposed form details/snip All of this makes sense and I don't see any real

Re: Questions to be answered for link request - V2

2004-10-22 Thread Upayavira
Hunsberger, Peter wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Good comments by Bertrand and David, so I'll integrate them in the original text to get a better idea of the end result. --- How to get listed snipproposed form details/snip All of this makes sense

Re: Questions to be answered for link request - V2

2004-10-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le 22 oct. 04, à 15:49, Hunsberger, Peter a écrit : ...Would an Intranet applications section also make sense? As I see it, this list would be a list of organizations and applications with a brief description of the application. Perhaps a screen shot or two would also be encouraged or even

Re: Questions to be answered for link request

2004-10-22 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: H.vanderLinden wrote: How can we verify this site is actually built with Cocoon? I think it is good to ask them to tell us. Then we review it and we would verify behind the scenes. I do various tests like view-source and especially do 'head http://them.com/' which

Re: Questions to be answered for link request

2004-10-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le 22 oct. 04, à 16:10, David Crossley a écrit : ...How do other people determine that a site is actually based on Cocoon? I don't think there's much more than what you suggest. Looking at the way the HTML is serialized can help a bit but it's really getting into forensics at this point ;-) The

RE: Questions to be answered for link request - V2

2004-10-22 Thread H . vanderLinden
Hi, Would an Intranet applications section also make sense? As I see it, this list would be a list of organizations and applications with a brief description of the application. Perhaps a screen shot or two would also be encouraged or even required? I'd love to see this, yes with some

Questions to be answered for link request

2004-10-21 Thread H . vanderLinden
Guys, I tend to enter the result of this discussion in Bugzilla, or maybe someone takes over and puts it directly in the docs, we'll see. For now I just want to do an inventory of questions we'd like to be answered in a link request. Here's a proposal for the text, [[ my comments between brackets