Unico Hommes wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
I tend to think the dependency is from session-fw on xsp, not the
other way around. Unless this becomes really difficult to
accomplish
I'd prefer keeping it the
Am Mi, den 10.03.2004 schrieb Reinhard Pötz um 11:03:
Stephan Michels wrote:
Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz um 16:37:
We should move XSP in a block anyway.
+1 from Stefano, Antonio, Reinhard
+0.5 (=good idea, won't be able to help)
I
Stephan Michels wrote:
Am Mi, den 10.03.2004 schrieb Reinhard Pötz um 11:03:
Stephan Michels wrote:
Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz um 16:37:
We should move XSP in a block anyway.
+1 from Stefano, Antonio, Reinhard
+0.5
I have following problem, that
src/blocks/session-fw/conf/xsp-session-fw.xconf
depends on the xsp block, but won't be executed before the
patch files
of the xsp block :-/
This may require a change to the build system. Hmm.
What about moving *all* xsp stuff into the xsp block?
Am Mi, den 10.03.2004 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler um 14:24:
I have following problem, that
src/blocks/session-fw/conf/xsp-session-fw.xconf
depends on the xsp block, but won't be executed before the
patch files
of the xsp block :-/
This may require a change to the build
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Stephan Michels wrote:
Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz um 16:37:
We should move XSP in a block anyway.
+1 from Stefano, Antonio, Reinhard
+0.5 (=good idea, won't be able to help)
I can offer some help, if nobody on it, then I can try
Unico Hommes wrote:
I tend to think the dependency is from session-fw on xsp, not
the other way around. Unless this becomes really difficult to
accomplish I'd prefer keeping it the way it is now. I will do
some research as to what would be involved to change the
build system to
