Re: Very early 2.1.12-dojo1_1-dev committed

2009-02-26 Thread lingerer huang
Hi,Jeremy It's ok by now.I already modified the source for my own project.When you have time we can discuss the implement. And the new dojo 1.3 b2 is out and break the implement again.This time is about setValue and getValue.I can't find a way out so I have to keep using the b1 version.When you

Re: Very early 2.1.12-dojo1_1-dev committed

2009-02-24 Thread Jeremy Quinn
Hi Roy Many thanks for the continued updates. Sorry to say, still too busy earning at the moment regards Jeremy On 16 Feb 2009, at 04:40, lingerer huang wrote: Hi,Jeremy The new dojo 1.3 is on the way. When I tried using dojo 1.3 beta1,many widgets failed. According to the

Re: Very early 2.1.12-dojo1_1-dev committed

2009-02-15 Thread lingerer huang
Hi,Jeremy The new dojo 1.3 is on the way. When I tried using dojo 1.3 beta1,many widgets failed. According to the http://trac.dojotoolkit.org/ticket/7994, the implement should modified too. Regards Roy Huang.

Re: Very early 2.1.12-dojo1_1-dev committed

2009-02-15 Thread 黄海冬公司邮箱
Hi,Jeremy There also a http://trac.dojotoolkit.org/ticket/8484 will affect many widgets Regards Roy Huang

Re: Very early 2.1.12-dojo1_1-dev committed

2009-01-26 Thread Jeremy Quinn
Hi Roy Sorry, no progress, I am busy on a commercial project at the moment . Will get back to it soon I hope regards Jeremy On 22 Jan 2009, at 09:46, lingerer huang wrote: Hi,Jeremy Is there any progress?I know it is not appropriate to ask that,but I want to help to speed it

Re: Very early 2.1.12-dojo1_1-dev committed

2009-01-22 Thread lingerer huang
Hi,Jeremy Is there any progress?I know it is not appropriate to ask that,but I want to help to speed it up. Regards Roy Huang

Re: Very early 2.1.12-dojo1_1-dev committed

2008-12-08 Thread imran
Jeremy Quinn wrote: Dear All, I have the great pleasure to announce that a *very* pre-alpha release of my re-working of the Ajax and CForms blocks for Dojo 1.1.1 has been committed to : BRANCH_2_1_X-dojo1_1. Although there are no circumstances whatever in which you should use this for

Re: Very early 2.1.12-dojo1_1-dev committed

2008-10-29 Thread 黄海冬公司邮箱
Hi,Jeremy I found the reason why your code did't work under IE7. I found a thread from dojo support forum http://dojotoolkit.org/forum/dojo-core-dojo-0-9/dojo-core-support/loading-cu stom-modules-ie7 and they are right,it is comma issues. I post your js code to jslint http://www.jslint.com/ and

Re: Very early 2.1.12-dojo1_1-dev committed

2008-10-29 Thread lingerer huang
Hi,Jeremy I found another problem under IE7.Your new forms-field-styling.xsl will render action widget in line 508-518,the result will looks like: input onClick=cocoon.forms.submitForm(this.focusNode, this.id);return false iconClass= dojoType=dijit.form.Button type=submit name=delete id=delete

Re: Very early 2.1.12-dojo1_1-dev committed

2008-10-23 Thread Jeremy Quinn
Hi Roy On 21 Oct 2008, at 03:22, lingerer huang wrote: As most user and developer ,I am using Microsoft's OS,I am using Windows' XP. But I do use many type of browsers like IE,firefox,google chrome. The last time I had to debug MSIE issues with CForms was while developing the

Re: Very early 2.1.12-dojo1_1-dev committed

2008-10-20 Thread Jeremy Quinn
Hi Roy Many thanks for your feedback On 17 Oct 2008, at 10:42, lingerer huang wrote: Hi,Jeremy One of my project need to combine cocoon and dojo 1.2 together,so I checked your branch and tested it. You did a good job but I still found some problems: 1.Your custom dojo module can't be

Re: Very early 2.1.12-dojo1_1-dev committed

2008-10-20 Thread lingerer huang
Hi,Jeremy As most user and developer ,I am using Microsoft's OS,I am using Windows' XP. But I do use many type of browsers like IE,firefox,google chrome. I am just a dojo user not a developer, so debug dojo and apply some patch is beyond me by now. But I will try to find the problem. Anyway,