Sorry Micah for the late reply, somehow completely missed updates on
this thread..
It's based on 2.1.x , bugzilla entry is [1] for the patch, discussion is
continuing at [2]
Jorg
[1] http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32102
[2] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=109
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:43:37 +0100, Ugo Cei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Il giorno 02/nov/04, alle 15:29, Jorg Heymans ha scritto:
>
> > Is there a reason why we have our own multipart parser instead of
> > using commons-fileupload? This has come up already about 1.5 years ago
> > [1].
>
> Maybe w
Micah Dubinko wrote:
Hi Jorg,
Very good. Let me ask a few questions.
Which branch are you doing this on?
Do you think it needs to be backported to the 2.1 branch?
Generally speaking, bug fixes and minor new features should go to the
both branches. More important changes should be first written fo
Hi Jorg,
Very good. Let me ask a few questions.
Which branch are you doing this on?
Do you think it needs to be backported to the 2.1 branch?
Can you send me the patches when there is something to look at?
Thanks!
.micah
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Micah Dubinko wrote:
I want to get involved in Cocoon mor
Micah Dubinko wrote:
I want to get involved in Cocoon more, and wonder if this would be a
good project to cut my teeth on.
So, provided nobody objects, I'd like to volunteer to take on this
little project. I'm sure I'll have some questions along the way, but
nothing the fine folks on IRC or th
I want to get involved in Cocoon more, and wonder if this would be a
good project to cut my teeth on.
So, provided nobody objects, I'd like to volunteer to take on this
little project. I'm sure I'll have some questions along the way, but
nothing the fine folks on IRC or this list can't handle.
I concer with Ugo. Please also see
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24289
for a patch to the current MultipartParser to handle multipar/mixed.
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Ugo Cei wrote:
Il giorno 02/nov/04, alle 15:29, Jorg Heymans ha scritto:
Is there a reason why we have our own multip
Il giorno 02/nov/04, alle 15:29, Jorg Heymans ha scritto:
Is there a reason why we have our own multipart parser instead of
using commons-fileupload? This has come up already about 1.5 years ago
[1].
Maybe when the multipart parser was invented, commons-fileupload wasn't
yet there, or maybe it w
