Pati
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2/1/2004 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: Releasing 2.1.4?
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
WDYAT?
+1 for me
I'd also like to know your oppinions about using the new
http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/... location to (maybe in
addition for the 2.1.4 release) place
Giacomo Pati wrote:
+1 for me
I'd also like to know your oppinions about using the new
http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/... location to (maybe in
addition for the 2.1.4 release) place the dist (would be
/www/www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/cocoon/distributions/ on
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
+1 for me
I'd also like to know your oppinions about using the new
http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/... location to (maybe in
addition for the 2.1.4 release) place the dist (would be
Giacomo Pati wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
But: I see a sense in putting our jars there, I'm not so sure what the
use
in putting also the distribution (the src) there is?
If you look at the repository structure proposed there you'll have
distributions directory as well (BTW: IIRC Avalon
Giacomo Pati wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
But: I see a sense in putting our jars there, I'm not so sure what the
use
in putting also the distribution (the src) there is?
If you look at the repository structure proposed there you'll have
distributions
Ralph Goers wrote:
I too use maven and would be interested in knowing how you will be
organizing this. I currently have all the Cocoon jars in a single cocoon
group and all the jars have 2.1.3 in their names. Likewise, all the
excalbur stuff is in one group as well.
Exactly. After running the
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
WDYAT?
+1 for me
I'd also like to know your oppinions about using the new
http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/... location to (maybe in
addition for the 2.1.4 release) place the dist (would be
/www/www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/cocoon/distributions/ on
On 30 Jan 2004, at 09:54, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
What do you all think about releasing 2.1.4? :)
+1. Can you also name the archives cocoon-2.1.4.tar.gz and
cocoon-2.1.4.zip, to make it obvious what file people have downloaded?
Thanks,
Andrew.
--
Andrew Savory, Managing Director, Luminas
What do you all think about releasing 2.1.4? :)
There are some open issues from our management list:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=25320
And next friday is our first first friday for this year. So I
would propose to start the code freeze right after the first friday
On 30.01.2004 10:54, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
What do you all think about releasing 2.1.4? :)
There are some open issues from our management list:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=25320
This one that is about the next release looks much better :)
http://nagoya.apache.org
On 30 Jan 2004, at 05:40, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 30.01.2004 10:54, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
What do you all think about releasing 2.1.4? :)
There are some open issues from our management list:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=25320
This one that is about the next
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 30.01.2004 10:54, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
What do you all think about releasing 2.1.4? :)
There are some open issues from our management list:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=25320
This one that is about the next release looks much better
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
WDYAT?
+1
Ugo
Le Vendredi, 30 jan 2004, à 14:30 Europe/Zurich, Geoff Howard a écrit :
On 30.01.2004 10:54, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
...I propose the 12th of february
as the release date for 2.1.4 - regardless if we have solved all
the open issues (RORE - Release often, release early).
WDYAT?
+1
+1 - The 1.3
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Vendredi, 30 jan 2004, à 14:30 Europe/Zurich, Geoff Howard a écrit :
On 30.01.2004 10:54, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
...I propose the 12th of february
as the release date for 2.1.4 - regardless if we have solved all
the open issues (RORE - Release often, release
Le Vendredi, 30 jan 2004, à 16:38 Europe/Zurich, Geoff Howard a écrit :
...Appears it's properly blocking in the release plan for next release:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=25321
Am I interpreting that right?
you're right - I have increased the severity to make it
On 30.01.2004 16:38, Geoff Howard wrote:
Appears it's properly blocking in the release plan for next release:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=25321
Yes, I changed it today shortly before all the other buzilla mails were
sent to the list. I don't know if no mail is
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
What do you all think about releasing 2.1.4? :)
There are some open issues from our management list:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=25320
And next friday is our first first friday for this year. So I
would propose
From: Upayavira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
What do you all think about releasing 2.1.4? :)
There are some open issues from our management list:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=25320
And next friday
19 matches
Mail list logo
