Re: What's up with 2.2 ?

2007-01-21 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Mark Lundquist wrote: On Jan 20, 2007, at 2:24 AM, Reinhard Poetz wrote: That's my fault. documentation was our first attempt but didn't fit our main goal of having separate deployment units. I will add a warning message to the sites overview. Thanks, and that is great for when someone is

Re: What's up with 2.2 ?

2007-01-21 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 19.01.2007 18:24, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Anyway, it would be good if someone with necessary skills could investigate further and find out why compiling serializers block demands so much memory. This has always been the case, also for 2.1. It's a problem of

Re: What's up with 2.2 ?

2007-01-20 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Reinhard Poetz napisał(a): Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: exactly. In order to keep the build process as lean as possible, we only compile the most important blocks by default. See trunk/blocks/pom.xml for the allblocks list. I see. It means that documentation [1]

Re: What's up with 2.2 ?

2007-01-20 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Mark Lundquist wrote: On Jan 19, 2007, at 10:04 AM, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: I see. It means that documentation [1] is little bit outdated. Could you please fix it or give me necessary rights allowing me to do so? My login is 'grek'. [1]

Re: What's up with 2.2 ?

2007-01-20 Thread Mark Lundquist
On Jan 20, 2007, at 2:24 AM, Reinhard Poetz wrote: That's my fault. documentation was our first attempt but didn't fit our main goal of having separate deployment units. I will add a warning message to the sites overview. Thanks, and that is great for when someone is visiting the listing

Re: What's up with 2.2 ?

2007-01-20 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Jean-Christophe Kermagoret escribió: Maybe, just write it on the Getting started documentation ;-) Believe me, it's difficult to start with 2.2 when documentation not complete and exact. If you want, I can correct it on daisy. Yes, please. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo.

Re: What's up with 2.2 ?

2007-01-20 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Jean-Christophe Kermagoret napisał(a): Maybe, just write it on the Getting started documentation ;-) Believe me, it's difficult to start with 2.2 when documentation not complete and exact. If you want, I can correct it on daisy. Again, thanks to everyone. I've added description of this

What's up with 2.2 ?

2007-01-19 Thread Jean-Christophe Kermagoret
Hello, what's working on cocoon 2.2 ? I tried : * ojb, not working, * cforms, not working (because of ajax, a file may be absent) * portal, not working I tried to use portal block but I get the following error : org.apache.avalon.framework.service.ServiceException: Component with

Re: What's up with 2.2 ?

2007-01-19 Thread Philipp Zerelles
Hi Jean-Christophe, did you look at the portal sample code? I built a new portal looking at the portal sample about 3 months ago and this portal is still working (with some minor adjustments over time as things changed). Also I just got CForms working in that portal (even a CForm login form

Re: What's up with 2.2 ?

2007-01-19 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Jean-Christophe Kermagoret wrote: Hello, what's working on cocoon 2.2 ? I tried : * ojb, not working, * cforms, not working (because of ajax, a file may be absent) * portal, not working I tried to use portal block but I get the following error :

Re: What's up with 2.2 ?

2007-01-19 Thread Jean-Christophe Kermagoret
Hi, happy to hear theses news. I tried your command but I now have the following error : Compiling 193 source files to /opt/src/cocoon/trunk/blocks/cocoon-serializers/cocoon-serializers-impl/target/classes [INFO]

Re: What's up with 2.2 ?

2007-01-19 Thread Felix Knecht
Java uses default memory settings (which seem to be to small). Try instead MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx512M mvn -Pallblocks install (as one command). This works for me. Felix Jean-Christophe Kermagoret schrieb: Hi, happy to hear theses news. I tried your command but I now have the following error :

Re: What's up with 2.2 ?

2007-01-19 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Jean-Christophe Kermagoret napisał(a): Hi, happy to hear theses news. I tried your command but I now have the following error : snip/ Failure executing javac, but could not parse the error: The system is out of resources. Consult the following stack trace for details.

Re: What's up with 2.2 ?

2007-01-19 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 19.01.2007 18:24, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Anyway, it would be good if someone with necessary skills could investigate further and find out why compiling serializers block demands so much memory. This has always been the case, also for 2.1. It's a problem of the code itself. For

Re: What's up with 2.2 ?

2007-01-19 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: It's typo, it should be -Dallblocks but I'm not sure what is its purpose. Maybe, 'build all blocks dear Maven'? ;-) exactly. In order to keep the build process as lean as possible, we only compile the most important blocks by default. See trunk/blocks/pom.xml for

Re: What's up with 2.2 ?

2007-01-19 Thread Jean-Christophe Kermagoret
Hi, A big thanks to all of you, it's working like a charm :-D This has always been the case, also for 2.1. It's a problem of the code itself. For Cocoon 2.1 the serializers block was not built by the user, but a jar was delivered. I don't know what we can do about it. Jörg Maybe, just

Re: What's up with 2.2 ?

2007-01-19 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Reinhard Poetz napisał(a): Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: exactly. In order to keep the build process as lean as possible, we only compile the most important blocks by default. See trunk/blocks/pom.xml for the allblocks list. I see. It means that documentation [1] is little bit outdated. Could

Re: What's up with 2.2 ?

2007-01-19 Thread Mark Lundquist
On Jan 19, 2007, at 10:04 AM, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: I see. It means that documentation [1] is little bit outdated. Could you please fix it or give me necessary rights allowing me to do so? My login is 'grek'. [1] http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/documentation/g1/756.html Well, I