Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 24.11.2003 15:36, Geoff Howard wrote:
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Should be no problem, though it might be better to have real
releases. Ralph Goers on the users list mentioned that it is always a
problem to grap the sources of these packages from CVS. The below
updated ver
On 24.11.2003 15:36, Geoff Howard wrote:
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Should be no problem, though it might be better to have real releases.
Ralph Goers on the users list mentioned that it is always a problem to
grap the sources of these packages from CVS. The below updated
versions are no real relea
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Should be no problem, though it might be better to have real releases.
Ralph Goers on the users list mentioned that it is always a problem to
grap the sources of these packages from CVS. The below updated versions
are no real releases, but only recent tagged versions in the
Should be no problem, though it might be better to have real releases. Ralph
Goers on the users list mentioned that it is always a problem to grap the
sources of these packages from CVS. The below updated versions are no real
releases, but only recent tagged versions in the CVS. So there is no s
It should be. Just do it.
Unico
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Antonio Gallardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: maandag 24 november 2003 14:18
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi:
>
> It is OK the following libs changes in cocoon 2.2:
>
> Add (from cocoon 2.1):
> excalibur-event-api-1.
Hi:
It is OK the following libs changes in cocoon 2.2:
Add (from cocoon 2.1):
excalibur-event-api-1.0.4-dev.jar
excalibur-event-impl-1.0.4-dev.jar
excalibur-sourceresolve-1.0.2-dev.jar
excalibur-store-1.0-dev.jar
excalibur-xmlutil-1.0-dev.jar
Remove:
excalibur-event-20030904.jar
excalibur-source
