Re: xslt and jxtg performance

2005-06-01 Thread Peter Hunsberger
On 5/31/05, Daniel Fagerstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BURGHARD Éric wrote: Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: If you want to help making JXTG faster you need to submit more information. We need examples that reproduce this behaviour with the JXTG template and the corresponding XSLT. We also need to

Re: xslt and jxtg performance

2005-06-01 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Peter Hunsberger wrote: On 5/31/05, Daniel Fagerstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BURGHARD Éric wrote: Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: If you want to help making JXTG faster you need to submit more information. We need examples that reproduce this behaviour with the JXTG template and the

xslt and jxtg performance

2005-05-31 Thread BURGHARD Éric
just for information, i've achieved some template migration from jxtg (2.2-dev) to xslt 2.0 (saxon8) and record a 7 to 10 factor speed increase on the same pages (cache desactivated). the templates (jx+jpath) were transformed (for the biggest part) by a simple xslt 2.0 stylesheet. Common

Re: xslt and jxtg performance

2005-05-31 Thread Sylvain Wallez
BURGHARD Éric wrote: just for information, i've achieved some template migration from jxtg (2.2-dev) to xslt 2.0 (saxon8) and record a 7 to 10 factor speed increase on the same pages (cache desactivated). An important point: which JXTG are you using? The original one, or the new

Re: xslt and jxtg performance

2005-05-31 Thread Reinhard Poetz
BURGHARD Éric wrote: just for information, i've achieved some template migration from jxtg (2.2-dev) to xslt 2.0 (saxon8) and record a 7 to 10 factor speed increase on the same pages (cache desactivated). the templates (jx+jpath) were transformed (for the biggest part) by a simple xslt 2.0

Re: xslt and jxtg performance

2005-05-31 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
BURGHARD Éric wrote: just for information, i've achieved some template migration from jxtg (2.2-dev) to xslt 2.0 (saxon8) and record a 7 to 10 factor speed increase on the same pages (cache desactivated). If you want to help making JXTG faster you need to submit more information. We need

Re: xslt and jxtg performance

2005-05-31 Thread BURGHARD Éric
An important point: which JXTG are you using? The original one, or the new implementation in trunk? It's a quite old now 2.2-dev, so i think this is not the refactored one. I will try to update to current trunk, and retest. We use macros and sometime evalBody (i've already heard about macros

Re: xslt and jxtg performance

2005-05-31 Thread BURGHARD Éric
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: If you want to help making JXTG faster you need to submit more information. We need examples that reproduce this behaviour with the JXTG template and the corresponding XSLT. We also need to know exactly what version of 2.2 you used. How did you measure preformance?

Re: xslt and jxtg performance

2005-05-31 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
BURGHARD Éric wrote: An important point: which JXTG are you using? The original one, or the new implementation in trunk? It's a quite old now 2.2-dev, so i think this is not the refactored one. I will try to update to current trunk, and retest. We use macros and sometime evalBody (i've

Re: xslt and jxtg performance

2005-05-31 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
BURGHARD Éric wrote: Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: If you want to help making JXTG faster you need to submit more information. We need examples that reproduce this behaviour with the JXTG template and the corresponding XSLT. We also need to know exactly what version of 2.2 you used. How did you