I just tried to create a function inside a flowScript
...
private void doAnything(){
String foo = null;
FooManager manager = (FooManager)getComponent(FooManager.ROLE);
manager.doMyWishes(foo);
}
...
this throws an ClassCastException...
as long as the my variable is filled up later on in
On 13 Jun 2004, at 22:27, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Jeremy Quinn wrote:
Hi All
I am working on a search form to add to the Lucene samples, that uses
CForms to manipulate a QueryBean that performs queries for you. The
Bean assembles LuceneQueries directly, so you don't use text
expressions, you add
Hello cocoondevs,
we are running cocoon-2.1.5 app and after around 150.000 requests
we get the following error in our error.log and the app. generates no longer
content must be restarted.
Have you any idea about possible reasons or a solution,
which could help us to isolate the problem.
Hi all,
More and more, the limitations of objects provided by the FOM seem like
arbitrary constraints that go in the way of people and produce
confusion. Furthermore, these restrictions only apply to the JS
flowscript and not to JavaFlow, thus making JS flowscript a second zone
citizen
+1 to remove restrictions on existing objects.
+1 to add cocoon.avalonContext.
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }
Le 14 juin 04, à 12:01, Sylvain Wallez a écrit :
Please cast your votes!
- [ +1] to remove restrictions on existing objects.
- [ +1] to add cocoon.avalonContext.
-Bertrand
On 14.06.2004 12:01, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
That's why I propose to remove these restrictions my having
cocoon.request, cocoon.response and cocoon.context providing the full
API defined by the interfaces in org.apache.cocoon.environment.
Furthermore, I propose to add cocoon.avalonContext to
On 14 Jun 2004, at 09:59, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
On 13 Jun 2004, at 22:27, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Jeremy Quinn wrote:
Hi All
I am working on a search form to add to the Lucene samples, that
uses CForms to manipulate a QueryBean that performs queries for you.
The Bean assembles LuceneQueries
On 14 Jun 2004, at 11:01, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Please cast your votes!
The ease with which it can be worked around (thanks Sylvain) and the
fact this is available to JavaFlow are good arguments IMHO.
- [ +1 ] to remove restrictions on existing objects.
- [ +1 ] to add cocoon.avalonContext.
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
- [ ] to remove restrictions on existing objects.
+1
- [ ] to add cocoon.avalonContext.
-1 for the name avalonContext. I think we should avoid references
to Avalon whereever possible. Otherwise perhaps we have to rename
it in the future.
So, +1 if a different name is
On 14 Jun 2004, at 12:11, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
- [ ] to remove restrictions on existing objects.
+1
- [ ] to add cocoon.avalonContext.
-1 for the name avalonContext. I think we should avoid references
to Avalon whereever possible. Otherwise perhaps we have to rename
it in
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 26 May 2004, at 10:17, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Some things that come to my mind for 2.2:
- first finished version of CForms.
- deprecate XSP (and provide a viable alternative)
many people talking about deprecate XSP but can i ask something?
+1 to remove restrictions on existing objects.
+0 to add cocoon.avalonContext.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 26 May 2004, at 10:17, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Some things that come to my mind for 2.2:
- first finished version of CForms.
- deprecate XSP (and provide a viable alternative)
many people talking about deprecate
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
- [+1] to remove restrictions on existing objects.
- [+0] to add cocoon.avalonContext.
Leo Simons wrote:
Michael Wechner wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
In this case, Noel has raised some perfectly valid concerns about
files living on http://www.apache.org/dist/ without a PMC putting
them there (which is a *big thing*, for legal and other reasons). If
I were lenya, I wouldn't complain
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
- [ ] to remove restrictions on existing objects.
+1
- [ ] to add cocoon.avalonContext.
-1 for the name avalonContext. I think we should avoid references to Avalon whereever possible. Otherwise perhaps we have to rename it in the
This context is a map containing key value pairs, it contains some
global information (paths etc.) and e.g. the object model.
So even if we would move away from avalon we could have this
map without breaking compatibility here.
That's why I'm against avalonContext.
We already have
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
This context is a map containing key value pairs, it contains some global information (paths etc.) and e.g. the object model.
So even if we would move away from avalon we could have this map without breaking compatibility here. That's why I'm against avalonContext.
Ok, I
Thanks for that.
I've been filling out the page on creating widgets as I've discovered
things. Hopefully it'll help other people trying to do the same thing. I'd
appreciate someone casting an experienced eye over it though, to make sure
I'm not doing anything stupid.
Cheers,
Vil.
Andreas
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29556.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29556.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi gang!
As you may well be aware, avalon-excalibur has split out and is now
excalibur.apache.org. All the content that used to be in the
avalon-excalibur cvs module is now @
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/excalibur/trunk/
this includes the fortress and ecm containers, by-the-way.
Just like
Hi all,
i test the gui form with the standard IE5.0 based on win2000
there are 2 possible bugs
1 is based in the htmlarea script. (I look at it)
after excluding the load of the script there are a an error in
forms-lib.js at line 65
the compare of
if (name == undefined)
can't work because
Leo Simons dijo:
Hi gang!
As you may well be aware, avalon-excalibur has split out and is now
excalibur.apache.org. All the content that used to be in the
avalon-excalibur cvs module is now @
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/excalibur/trunk/
this includes the fortress and ecm
If you haven't done it yet, I _strongly_ suggest y'all to update your
Eclipse to 3.0RC2 on MacOS/X. It's quite an impressive update!
Pier
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
[+1] to remove restrictions on existing objects.
[+0] to add cocoon.avalonContext.
Joerg
Same here.
Tony
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29562.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29562.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi folks,
I'm trying to use a https source in a simple pipeline, but Java doesn't
like the server certificate on the originating side. With the help of
openssl, I managed to save a local copy of the certificate, but now I
need to add it to my local set of certificates.
Despite gazillion of web
Pier,
On 14 Jun 2004, at 16:51, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
If you haven't done it yet, I _strongly_ suggest y'all to update your
Eclipse to 3.0RC2 on MacOS/X. It's quite an impressive update!
Out of interest, what did you update from?! I can't find any release
news for RC2, so thought it was only bug
Steven Noels wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm trying to use a https source in a simple pipeline, but Java doesn't
like the server certificate on the originating side. With the help of
openssl, I managed to save a local copy of the certificate, but now I
need to add it to my local set of certificates.
Il giorno 14/giu/04, alle 17:51, Pier Fumagalli ha scritto:
If you haven't done it yet, I _strongly_ suggest y'all to update your
Eclipse to 3.0RC2 on MacOS/X. It's quite an impressive update!
Compared to what? I have 3.0RC1 but with the current rythm of releases
I was planning to wait until the
On 14 Jun 2004, at 22:36, Tony Collen wrote:
I'm no expert, but this is what I've found so far:
http://www.hp.com/products1/unix/java/infolibrary/install_verisign.html
http://www.digicert.com/ssl-certificate-installation-java.htm
http://www.pankaj-k.net/WSOverSSL/WSOverSSL-HOWTO.html
That last one
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
What worries me is that sendPageAndWait provides an argument, which
is reference to the cleanup function. AFAIU, this function should be
invoked after page is sent. If you take a look at sendPageAndWait,
it looks like:
I have a custom transformer that extends AbstractSaxTransformer for
making XML-RPC
calls. It extracts a method call element from an input document and
sends this to
the remote service for processing.
My problem is that when I use the startSerializedXMLRecording() method
from
Some further investigation shows that this is the default behaviour of
the SAX parser to not pass in the
namespace attribute with the rest of the element attributes in
startElement().
I set the parser namespace-prefixes feature property to 'true' in
cocoon.xconf to allow the namespace
attribute
Hi Guys,
I'm about to get people looking at the Event Cache block. Does anyone
have any thoughts on its suitability for a production environment? I'm
especially interested in the event registry - how scalable is it? We're
currently storing our registers in HSQLDB which is scaling ok, but
38 matches
Mail list logo
