[continuum] BUILD ERROR: Cocoon - Apache Cocoon [build root] -

2008-09-23 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=115078projectId=51 Build statistics: State: Error Previous State: Ok Started at: Tue 23 Sep 2008 01:00:18 -0700 Finished at: Tue 23 Sep 2008 01:00:29 -0700 Total time: 10s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Number:

[continuum] BUILD ERROR: Cocoon - Apache Cocoon [build root] -

2008-09-23 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=115349projectId=51 Build statistics: State: Error Previous State: Error Started at: Tue 23 Sep 2008 02:00:16 -0700 Finished at: Tue 23 Sep 2008 02:00:27 -0700 Total time: 10s Build Trigger: Schedule Build

Re: Help with Continuations

2008-09-23 Thread Jeremy Quinn
Hi Joerg Many thanks for your confirmation. Yes, the SuggestionListGenerator uses the sitemap path and the continuation id to lookup the continuation. I don't see any way of working around this. What a shame, I guess this rules out putting this functionality into a system-level sitemap.

Re: Help with Continuations

2008-09-23 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 23.09.2008 13:39, Jeremy Quinn wrote: I don't see any way of working around this. What a shame, I guess this rules out putting this functionality into a system-level sitemap. That's actually by intention and used to be different. It was Leszek who changed it [1]. One very good reason

Re: New Spring Maintenance policy

2008-09-23 Thread Peter Hunsberger
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Joerg Heinicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 22.09.2008 21:09, Antonio Gallardo wrote: Perhaps an old news for some, but I would like to know how you guys think this affects cocoon: http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=50727 Are we going to

Re: New Spring Maintenance policy

2008-09-23 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 23.09.2008 22:43, Peter Hunsberger wrote: As the number of versions of Spring used in production grows, it is impossible for us to provide free maintenance for multiple releases and perform backports of issues. Doing so would unfairly subsidize conservative customers who want to remain on a

Re: New Spring Maintenance policy

2008-09-23 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 23.09.2008 22:43, Peter Hunsberger wrote: As the number of versions of Spring used in production grows, it is impossible for us to provide free maintenance for multiple releases and perform backports of issues. Doing so would unfairly subsidize conservative customers