Re: FYI: DocSynch as a collaborative editing tool?

Le Vendredi, 10 oct 2003, à 18:15 Europe/Zurich, Arje Cahn a écrit : Argh.. That's not the same as SubEthaEdit! It allows only one person to edit the document at a time! Not very useful then. Will keep looking though, being able to run such a tool on IRC would be good I think. thanks very much

Re: [ANN] Docs Update

.. I reverted the rearranging of the docs and also updated our site in the cvs... thanks Carsten! -Bertrand

Re: [RT] Improved navigation of learning objects

Hi Stefano! Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > The approach above works but it requires two operations: > > 1) creation of the LO > 2) connection of the LO in the linkmap Can you explain to me, why you are always talking from learning objects in this context? Isn't a learning object a bit too specific

Re: [ANN] Docs Update

Antonio Gallardo wrote: Geoff Howard dijo: ... Thanks for doing this, Carsten. I'm sure it was painful. By my count there were about 1.5 million cvs mails by the way. ROTFL! When I saw the count of new mails in my INBOX (320+) I thought somebody did a fool joke to me or I was been attacked by so

Re: [ANN] Docs Update

Geoff Howard dijo: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> Hi, >> >> as you already might have noticed due to the three or four cvs >> mails (I didn't count to accurately...) I reverted the >> rearranging of the docs and also updated our site in the cvs. >> This means, we have the old structure with the lates

Re: [ANN] Docs Update

Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Hi, as you already might have noticed due to the three or four cvs mails (I didn't count to accurately...) I reverted the rearranging of the docs and also updated our site in the cvs. This means, we have the old structure with the latest content (hopefully). I have also up

Re: [ANN] Docs Update

On 12.10.2003 22:09, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Hi, as you already might have noticed due to the three or four cvs mails (I didn't count to accurately...) I reverted the rearranging of the docs and also updated our site in the cvs. This means, we have the old structure with the latest content (hope

[ANN] Docs Update

Hi, as you already might have noticed due to the three or four cvs mails (I didn't count to accurately...) I reverted the rearranging of the docs and also updated our site in the cvs. This means, we have the old structure with the latest content (hopefully). I have also updated the website, so we

Re: [RT] Improved navigation of learning objects

Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On Sunday, Oct 12, 2003, at 16:13 Europe/Rome, Alan Gutierrez wrote: The trouble with Wiki and docs is that new users, such as myself, are going to look for a documentation outline. A good TOC and index makes all the differnece in the world when searching documentation.

Re: [RT] Improved navigation of learning objects

* Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-12 16:04]: > On Sunday, Oct 12, 2003, at 16:13 Europe/Rome, Alan Gutierrez wrote: > > >The trouble with Wiki and docs is that new users, such as myself, > >are going to look for a documentation outline. A good TOC and index > >makes all the differn

fyi: agora

Not just for social engineering anymore :) http://www.agora.de/eng/index.html

We still need the Pizza compiler?

Hi: I saw there is still the pizza compiler in lib/optional. It this compiler still needed? If not, can we remove it from the distribution? Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo.

Re: [RT] Component manager, classloader and blocks

On Sunday, Oct 12, 2003, at 12:21 Europe/Rome, Stephan Michels wrote: On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On Friday, Oct 10, 2003, at 13:22 Europe/Rome, Stephan Michels wrote: To prevent component name collisions within, we could use prefixes like name collision of what?

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17593] - Allow to pass additional parameters to Flow+XMLForm functions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17593] - Allow to pass additional parameters to Flow+XMLForm functions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [RT] Moving towards a new documentation system

On Sunday, Oct 12, 2003, at 12:05 Europe/Rome, Joerg Heinicke wrote: I think it's just easier to use a number. I don't like the idea of having simply numbers in the URL. Let's have a look on the following URLs: http://www.sueddeutsche.de/deutschland/artikel/420/19401/ Sueddeutsche online has an

RE: Forrest and the NDS (Re: [RT] Moving towards a new documentation system)

From: Alan Gutierrez > * Reinhard Poetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-12 14:06]: > > > Stefano envisions a system where it is very easy to edit > content using > > a WYSIWIG editor (no structured text, no strange XML) for > *everybody* > > by simply clicking on an 'edit' button - without having >

[RT] Improved navigation of learning objects

On Sunday, Oct 12, 2003, at 16:13 Europe/Rome, Alan Gutierrez wrote: The trouble with Wiki and docs is that new users, such as myself, are going to look for a documentation outline. A good TOC and index makes all the differnece in the world when searching documentation. eheh, right on. Has anyone

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22707] - Syntax Error in build.bat on Windows ME

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22707] - Syntax Error in build.bat on Windows ME

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17593] - Allow to pass additional parameters to Flow+XMLForm functions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Forrest and the NDS (Re: [RT] Moving towards a new documentation system)

From: Alan Gutierrez > * Reinhard Poetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-12 14:06]: > > > Stefano envisions a system where it is very easy to edit > content using > > a WYSIWIG editor (no structured text, no strange XML) for > *everybody* > > by simply clicking on an 'edit' button - without havi

Re: Forrest and the NDS

On Sunday, Oct 12, 2003, at 14:31 Europe/Rome, Jeff Turner wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:40:39PM +0200, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: ... In case something is not clear, I'll be very happy to explain it. My main question is: to users, how is this system functionally different from a Wiki? for edit

Bug report for Cocoon 2 [2003/10/12]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: Forrest and the NDS (Re: [RT] Moving towards a new documentation system)

* Reinhard Poetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-12 14:06]: > Stefano envisions a system where it is very easy to edit content using a > WYSIWIG editor (no structured text, no strange XML) for *everybody* by > simply clicking on an 'edit' button - without having installed any > unknown software - and

RE: Forrest and the NDS (Re: [RT] Moving towards a new documentation system)

From: Jeff Turner > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:40:39PM +0200, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: ... > > In case something is not clear, I'll be very happy to explain it. > > My main question is: to users, how is this system > functionally different from a Wiki? Eg, a good one that has > 'related pages

Re: Forrest and the NDS (Re: [RT] Moving towards a new documentation system)

* Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-12 12:27]: > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:40:39PM +0200, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > ... > > In case something is not clear, I'll be very happy to explain it. > > My main question is: to users, how is this system functionally different > from a Wiki? Eg, a

Re: Forrest and the NDS (Re: [RT] Moving towards a new documentation system)

On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:40:39PM +0200, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: ... > In case something is not clear, I'll be very happy to explain it. My main question is: to users, how is this system functionally different from a Wiki? Eg, a good one that has 'related pages' inferred from the page's content

RE: [RT] Moving towards a new documentation system

Morning, > -Original Message- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicola Ken Barozzi > Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 2:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I will try to give you something to chew on. Here is an example page > (our > > homepage): > > > > > xsl="default">

Re: [RT] Moving towards a new documentation system

On Sunday, Oct 12, 2003, at 11:20 Europe/Rome, Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 11.10.2003 18:10, Antonio Gallardo wrote: Yep. You are "the master" here. Hello Antonio, the above is wrong and I guess Stefano does also not want that it is seen so. This was also the reason for his withdrawal as PMC head.

Re: Forrest and the NDS (Re: [RT] Moving towards a new documentation system)

On Sunday, Oct 12, 2003, at 04:23 Europe/Rome, Jeff Turner wrote: On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 03:17:48PM +0200, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On Saturday, Oct 11, 2003, at 14:25 Europe/Rome, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Please don't forget Forrest. we are not. :) Let's remember that there's hard reuse and so

Re: [RT] Moving towards a new documentation system

On Saturday, Oct 11, 2003, at 19:54 Europe/Rome, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Antonio Gallardo wrote: ... Based on lastest posts, I will like to see a fusion Lenya+Forrest. Is this posible or they are divorced. Synergy. What I want Forrest and Lenya to seek is syergy. Agreed 100%. Merging two proje

Re: [RT] Component manager, classloader and blocks

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > On Friday, Oct 10, 2003, at 13:22 Europe/Rome, Stephan Michels wrote: > > > To prevent component name collisions within, we could use prefixes like > > > > > > > > > > > > > name collision of what? you define the names of the compon

Re: repository block? (was Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1 gump.xml)

On 11.10.2003 11:15, Guido Casper wrote: Thanks Joerg, sorry for that. No problem, it was easy from the compiler error messages while Eclipse had no problem with compiling ;-) I think it would be a good idea to consolidate all the Source interfaces and source utilities either into the core or i

RE: [RT] Moving towards a new documentation system

On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 20:53, Robert Koberg wrote: > I currently call these in transformation using the document function. > Recently, I have been playing around with a XincludeFilter that does this > prior to transformation (I assume this is the route you would take :). It is > just that it is pro

Re: [RT] Moving towards a new documentation system

On 11.10.2003 17:19, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: ...How about naming files like 3948494-some-descriptive-name-for-humans-here.xml It's like suggesting to have a BugID "39484-my-file-can't-be-found" as the primary key of the bug table in mysql, just because people might want to edit bugs by hand

Re: [RT] Moving towards a new documentation system

On 11.10.2003 18:10, Antonio Gallardo wrote: Yep. You are "the master" here. Hello Antonio, the above is wrong and I guess Stefano does also not want that it is seen so. This was also the reason for his withdrawal as PMC head. Stefano might be something like a technical leader with his mostly