Irv Salisbury wrote:
Looking through the code, I can't understand why, but the useScopes
session attribute seems to be not getting saved. I simply added the
following test in the handleContinuation method:
if (userScopes == null){
getLogger().debug( Creating new
Le 30 juin 05, à 23:22, Ross Gardler a écrit :
...Does anyone know if port 9263 is open on the zone?
It is, and apparently still accessible from the outside (works from
here), but you need HTTP authorization to make requests to it.
-Bertrand
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic
Yesterday I had some time to look deeper into Knopflerfish and the OSGi spec.
This has led to a question about dependencies that I want to share and discuss
with others.
The most important reason why we are thinking about placing Cocoon on top
of OSGi is it's feature of a shielding classloader.
On 2005-06-01 06:11:24 -0700, Alexander Berezhnoy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (on users@cocoon.apache.org) said:
Dear friends,
I've been looking for this feature for a week already, nobody and nowhere
can't give me a definite answer.
I want to extract data with XPath from an XML file whoes name
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 30 juin 05, à 23:22, Ross Gardler a écrit :
...Does anyone know if port 9263 is open on the zone?
It is, and apparently still accessible from the outside (works from
here), but you need HTTP authorization to make requests to it.
Yes, I am handling the
On 01 Jul 2005, at 10:43, Ross Gardler wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 30 juin 05, à 23:22, Ross Gardler a écrit :
...Does anyone know if port 9263 is open on the zone?
It is, and apparently still accessible from the outside (works from
here), but you need HTTP authorization to make
Steven Noels wrote:
On 01 Jul 2005, at 10:43, Ross Gardler wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 30 juin 05, à 23:22, Ross Gardler a écrit :
...Does anyone know if port 9263 is open on the zone?
It is, and apparently still accessible from the outside (works from
here), but you need HTTP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35574.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35574.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35575.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35575.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35576.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ralph Goers wrote:
I would have no problem with that if LoggerManager had a method that was
called at the beginning of a request. If that was the case I wouldn't
even be using the Cocoon ContextMap as our LoggingFramework has its own
equivalent (for Log4J NDC type stuff). This would
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35578.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Yesterday I had some time to look deeper into Knopflerfish and the OSGi spec.
This has led to a question about dependencies that I want to share and discuss
with others.
The most important reason why we are thinking about placing Cocoon on top
of OSGi is it's feature
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35578.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Yesterday I had some time to look deeper into Knopflerfish and the
OSGi spec.
This has led to a question about dependencies that I want to share and
discuss
with others.
The most important reason why we are thinking about placing Cocoon on top
of OSGi is it's feature
Hi, is this only for committers?
Regards,
Jochen
Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27.06.2005 20:01:51:
Guys,
just a gentle reminder. The date of the ApacheCon
is coming closer ...would be great if a few more
people could make it. Please sign up if you think
you can make it.
Hi all,
It's my pleasure to announce that we've booked the Cocoon GetTogether 2005
conference areas on the following dates:
Wednesday October 5th -- Hackaton day 1 in the Felix Meritis building,
Amsterdam
Thursday October 6th -- Hackaton day 2 in the Felix Meritis building, Amsterdam
Friday
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29061.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
20 matches
Mail list logo
