I think the resolution also mentioned that we have a one year timeframe
to change this (we should definitly check this). But as already half of
the time past without us doing anything about it, well...
Carsten
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Ok, but you guys still need to fix:
Ralph Goers wrote:
+1. Does this avoid the problem of the Rhino license though (with 2.1)?
No :( But I think (though I'm not sure) that we have one year to change
something, so it should be fine to release 2.1.10 as is. But obviously
if we don't change 2.1.x, we won't be able to release something
Nathaniel Alfred wrote:
+1 to release 2.2-M2
+1 to release 2.1.10
+1 to drop block sharing
-1 to put 2.1.x into *pure* bug fixing mode
We should try to attract people to 2.2 rather than pushing them
away from 2.1 (because they may go somewhere else).
Agreed.
SNIP/
So my proposal is
Online report :
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org:12000/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/9/buildId/326
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Error
Started at: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 12:14:03 +
Finished at: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 12:14:04 +
Total
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 27.10.2006 20:57, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
We can then target the final release of 2.2 for December.
WE SHOULD REALLY GET 2.2 OUT *THIS YEAR*.
IMHO this is too fast. We did not receive any feedback on the 2.2
stuff from any non-committer (only people working with
Online report :
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org:12000/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/9/buildId/328
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Error
Started at: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:34:07 +
Finished at: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:34:15 +
Total
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I've done some modifications to the XML Graphics Commons build to create
Maven artifacts. I'd be grateful if someone could run the build (target:
maven-artifacts) to see if everything looks like it should. The
modifications are done for Trunk and the 1.1 branch (soon to be
Hi folks,
In http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/changes.html we read for each release:
snip
Contributors to this release
We thank the following people for their contributions to this release.
This is a list of all people who participated as committers:
[Committer's list]
This is a list of
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 27.10.2006 20:57, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
The release of 2.1.10 should be the last planned release for 2.1.x - we
should drop the block sharing between trunk and the branch of the blocks
right after the release and continue development of things only in trunk
from that
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
IMHO this is too fast. We did not receive any feedback on the 2.2 stuff
from any non-committer (only people working with committers). We should
run through some release candidates first, which gives the users the
impression of having something
Has someone attended to the remaining licensing issues?
I managed to update all the headers in source files
and will do so again just before the releases.
However, that is all that i can do.
The remaining tasks were noted in some past emails.
Going by memory they were:
NOTICE.txt and
11 matches
Mail list logo
