Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=77901&projectId=51
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 16 Apr 2008 21:05:49 -0700
Finished at: Wed 16 Apr 2008 21:08:19 -0700
Total time: 2m 29s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
On 16.04.2008 10:11, Jerry DuVal wrote:
Is this a bug?
Feature :) More an inconsistency than an actual bug. I for myself would
not rely on the correct order of both All.primaryKey and All.foo.
When a MultipartHttpServletRequest parses the values using MultipartParser
it puts the Inline Par
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=77768&projectId=51
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Wed 16 Apr 2008 12:35:01 -0700
Finished at: Wed 16 Apr 2008 12:37:34 -0700
Total time: 2m 32s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numb
Issue Subscription
Filter: COCOON-open-with-patch (106 issues)
Subscriber: cocoon
Key Summary
COCOON-2197 Making the cocoon-auth-block acegi-security-sample work
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2197
COCOON-2177 ImageOp with requested height & width both zero shoul
Is this a bug?
When a MultipartHttpServletRequest parses the values using MultipartParser
it puts the Inline Parts into a Vector, but when parsing FileParts it just
puts them into the "parts" hashtable. The problem with this is when a
Request has multiple FileParts named the same, the parsed part
Hi all,
I am looking for some information on the ETag header and cocoon and
found as most recent mail [1] around the topic.
As I understand [2] the recommendation is to create a custom Action and
add the header to the response object. Is there a need/interest to
generalize thus a action and have
On 16.04.2008 08:35, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=648313&view=rev
Log:
mv subprojects into trunk
Is there a reason for that? When I want to check out Cocoon trunk I
don't want to have all the subprojects of it, do I?
My first idea was to move our subprojects
On Apr 16, 2008, at 12:18, Saskia Heesen wrote:
Hello everybody!
I would like to use javaflow from Cocoon 2.2 since javaflow offers
more ways to test the code than flowscript. When I run the example I
get the error message:
2008-04-16 11:18:13,839 ERROR http-8080-Processor25
org.apache.
On 15.04.2008 03:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: reinhard
Date: Tue Apr 15 00:40:21 2008
New Revision: 648145
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=648145&view=rev
Log:
lazy initialization
(... have to figure out why an advice around the init() method on servlets
doesn't work as expected)
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 15.04.2008 12:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: reinhard
Date: Tue Apr 15 09:23:00 2008
New Revision: 648313
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=648313&view=rev
Log:
mv subprojects into trunk
Added:
cocoon/trunk/subprojects/
- copied from r648312, cocoo
On 15.04.2008 12:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: reinhard
Date: Tue Apr 15 09:23:00 2008
New Revision: 648313
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=648313&view=rev
Log:
mv subprojects into trunk
Added:
cocoon/trunk/subprojects/
- copied from r648312, cocoon/subprojects/
Removed:
Hello everybody!
I would like to use javaflow from Cocoon 2.2 since javaflow offers more ways to
test the code than flowscript. When I run the example I get the error message:
2008-04-16 11:18:13,839 ERROR http-8080-Processor25
org.apache.commons.javaflow.bytecode.StackRecorder - stack corrupti
12 matches
Mail list logo
