Re: Next releases of JNet, SSF and blockdeployment

2008-08-19 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Grzegorz Kossakowski pisze: Reinhard Pötz pisze: Yes. If you can help me with updating the docs, changes.xml and announcements ([EMAIL PROTECTED] and website), we can have a release this week, otherwise I'm not sure if I can do it this week. I'll have a free time until Thursday and call help

[jira] Created: (COCOON-2239) Add support for servlet protocol in flow's sendPage

2008-08-19 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski (JIRA)
Add support for servlet protocol in flow's sendPage --- Key: COCOON-2239 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2239 Project: Cocoon Issue Type: Task Components: -

Differences between Cocoon 2.1 and 2.2 (was: Re: Renaming Corona to Cocoon 3.0 and infrastructure)

2008-08-19 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Hi Jeremy, Jeremy Quinn pisze: From the PoV of users, it should also be clear : If you want or have to use Ant, use 2.1 If you want or have to use Maven, use 2.2 If you just need the Pipeline API, use 3.0 I'm not sure if I get you here correctly so I'll ask: Do you express your own wish or

Re: [jira] Created: (COCOON-2239) Add support for servlet protocol in flow's sendPage

2008-08-19 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Grzegorz Kossakowski (JIRA) pisze: Add support for servlet protocol in flow's sendPage --- Key: COCOON-2239 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2239 Project: Cocoon Issue Type: Task Components: - Components: Sitemap, - Flowscript

Re: Differences between Cocoon 2.1 and 2.2 (was: Re: Renaming Corona to Cocoon 3.0 and infrastructure)

2008-08-19 Thread Jeremy Quinn
Hi Grzegorz, Many thanks for your response : ) On 19 Aug 2008, at 12:54, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Hi Jeremy, Jeremy Quinn pisze: From the PoV of users, it should also be clear : If you want or have to use Ant, use 2.1 If you want or have to use Maven, use 2.2 If you just need the

Re: Differences between Cocoon 2.1 and 2.2 (was: Re: Renaming Corona to Cocoon 3.0 and infrastructure)

2008-08-19 Thread Jeremy Quinn
Just an added note On 19 Aug 2008, at 16:04, Jeremy Quinn wrote: It would be typical to assume (IMHO) that 3.0 is somehow better than 2.2 which is somehow better than 2.1, just because of the version numbers. This assumption is so easy to make, because for instance : 2.1 was better

Re: request encoding conundrum

2008-08-19 Thread Jeremy Quinn
Hi Grzegorz, Sorry for the delay, but I finally got to look at the Upload Sample in CForms. The simple one, without the progress bar does seem to work in my local copy of 2.1.12-dev that I am working on. I tried the sample string below and it came through correctly. Does switching ajax on